Circulating CD34+ Progenitor Cells are Predictive of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality and are Influenced by Physical Activity.

David Muggeridge; Jennifer Dodd; Mark D. Ross

doi:10.1101/2020.06.24.20139220

Abstract

Background Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) play an important role in vascular repair and may influence cardiovascular (CV) health and longevity. Exercise is known to modulate these cells via mobilization from the bone marrow. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the association of CPCs with mortality and explore the association between physical activity (PA) and CPCs.

Design We studied 1,751 individuals from the Framingham Offspring cohort (66 ± 9 years [40-92 years], 54% female). CPCs (CD34^+, CD34⁺CD133⁺, CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺) were measured in participants using flow cytometry. Multivariable cox regression analyses were performed to investigate relationship of CPCs with future CV event, CV mortality and all-cause mortality. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between self-reported PA and CPC counts.

Results Following adjustment for standard risk factors, there was an inverse association between CD34⁺ CPCs and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) per unit increase in CD34⁺, 0.79; 95% CI 0.64 – 0.98, P=0.036). CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were inversely associated with CV mortality (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 – 0.91, P=0.013). Associations of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ with mortality were strongest in participants with pre-existing CVD. PA was associated with CD34⁺ CPCs only in CVD participants. This relationship was maintained after adjustment for confounding variables.

Conclusions Higher number of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺ CD133⁺ CPCs were inversely associated with all-cause and CV mortality. These associations were strongest in participants already diagnosed with CVD. PA is independently associated with CD34⁺ CPCs in individuals with CVD only, suggestive of greater benefit for this population group.

Introduction

Circulating progenitor cells (CPC) are a heterogenous group of cells which have tissue regenerative potential. A number of studies have shown that CD34⁺ CPCs and several subsets of CD34⁺ cells (such as CD34⁺CD133⁺/KDR⁺) can participate in vascular repair and growth ^{1, 2}, and may be associated with vascular endothelial function³. Therefore these cells may reflect vascular integrity and have been used as vascular biomarkers of repair ⁴.

Low number of these CPCs are associated with vascular dysfunction ^{3, 5} and subsequent greater cardiovascular (CV) risk ⁶. Observational studies have shown that individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) exhibit lower number and angiogenic function of these CPCs ⁷, reflecting reduced vascular repair capacity. Studies have demonstrated that in individuals hospitalized with heart failure ⁸, or with acute coronary syndromes ⁹, low number of CD34⁺ CPCs predict earlier mortality in these patients compared to patients with high numbers of CD34⁺ CPCs, which suggests impaired vascular repair capacity in those with higher mortality risk. Whilst there are no studies that have investigated the role of CD34⁺ CPCs and associated subsets in predicting clinical endpoints in a heterogenous human population, there is evidence to suggest that these CPCs are reflective of subclinical atherosclerotic risk in an apparently healthy population ⁷.

Lifestyle behaviors can significantly affect CV health. Smoking, physical inactivity and obesity are associated with perturbed vascular health, leading to greater risk of mortality. Physical activity, known for its effect on improving vascular function ¹⁰ may do so in part via modulating CPC content and/or function. Studies investigating acute ¹¹ and chronic exercise training ¹² have demonstrated that progenitor cells can be mobilized into peripheral blood compartment in humans, where they can exert their vasoreparative functions. However, the efficacy of exercise training to promote progenitor cell number has been argued, with recent evidence demonstrating little or no change in CPC number in humans after exercise training ⁴. As yet, there is no evidence from large cohorts investigating the association between physical activity and CPCs.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic potential of CD34⁺ CPCs on all-cause and CV mortality. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between self-reported physical activity on CPCs in a large cohort. We hypothesized that circulating CD34⁺ CPCs and subpopulations would predict mortality, and that these cells are associated with self-reported physical activity levels.

Methods

Study Sample

The Framingham Heart Study (FHS) is a longitudinal community-based cohort set up in 1948 under the direction of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) aimed to determine factors that contribute to the onset and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD)¹³. Subsequently, an Offspring cohort was included from 1971¹⁴. Participants (n=3,002) in the Framingham Offspring cohort who attended the 8^th examination cycle (2004-2008) were eligible for our investigation, with n=1,751 included in the study due to availability of key data. Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1.

View this table:

Table 1. Participant Characteristics

This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval for all data collection and research purposes was granted by Boston University Medical Centre, and consent was obtained for the collection and use of the data available for secondary investigators. Edinburgh Napier University Research Ethics and Integrity Committee approved of the use of the secondary dataset for the purposes of the study.

Clinical Assessment

All participants underwent a clinical and risk factor assessment including assessment of blood pressure, height and body mass. Fasting blood samples were drawn for quantification of glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides.

Quantification of Circulating Progenitor Cells

Blood samples were collected from participants in the fasted state to quantify CPC counts. Blood samples were centrifuged and the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated for cell phenotyping as previously described¹⁵. PBMCs were stained with anti-CD34 FITC, anti-CD133 APC and anti-KDR-PE antibodies (all BD Biosciences). CD34⁺ cells were gated for subsequent expression of CD133 and finally KDR. Total progenitor cells are defined as CD34⁺ cells, and EPCs are defined as CD34⁺CD133⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺ cells. Analysis of flow cytometry files were performed using FlowJo analysis software (Treeestar, Inc.) and reviewed by investigators blinded to the identity of the participants.

Endothelial Cell Colony Forming Cells (ECFC)

In 1653 participants, PBMCs were also used to assess endothelial cell colony forming cells (ECFC). PBMCs were cultured on fibronectin-coated tissue culture plates (BD Biosciences) and cultured for 7 days. After 7 days of culture, the number of colonies in each well were counted by a single blinded individual. ECFC number was reported as average number of colonies per well up to 12 wells.

Mortality and Event Incidence

Follow up was conducted for primary end points of all-cause and cardiovascular death. Cause of death was determined through medical history, review of medical records, death certificate, interview of next of kin, and review of the National Death Index. Cardiovascular death was defined as death attributed to ischemic cause (fatal myocardial infarction, stroke). Cardiovascular event risk was only assessed in individuals with no pre-existing CVD or CV event occurring before exam 8 (n = 1467). CV event or incident CVD was assessed using the standard Framingham Heart Study criteria and included the following: new-onset angina, fatal and non-fatal MI or stroke, heart failure or intermittent claudication.

Self-Reported Physical Activity Levels

Self-report sleep, sitting time, slight, moderate and heavy activity were determined using a physical activity questionnaire employed by the Framingham Heart Study. The numbers of hours of certain activity per week were collected. A composite score was calculated (physical activity index; PAI), for each participant by weighting a 24hr activity recall. Participants were asked to report the number of hours in a typical day spent sleeping (weighting factor [WF] = 1) and in sedentary (WF = 1.1), slight (WF = 1.5), moderate (WF = 2.4), and heavy activities (WF = 5) ¹⁶. PAI was subsequently calculated by adding the products of the hours spent at each activity domain and their weighting factor based on the oxygen requirements for said activity 17.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were assessed for normality by assessing histograms and Q-Q plots. Data for CD34⁺, CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺, CD34⁺CD133⁺ and PAI were natural log transformed and EFCFs square root Appropriate data transformations were applied where relevant prior to further analysis. All participants were categorized into tertiles for each CPC measure for event and mortality risk analyses using Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank analyses. Subsequent Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed, utilizing transformed continuous data for CPC’s. Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, PAI, CVD and diabetes status, smoking status. To investigate the effects of CVD status, the data set was split and analyses repeated for those free of CVD at exam 8 (n = 1467) and those with a CVD diagnosis prior to exam 8 (n = 284). Proportional hazards assumptions for each of the Cox models were evaluated by plots of Schoenfeld residuals.

To assess the influence of physical activity on CPC counts, linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between CPC counts and PAI. A subset of physical activity, moderate + heavy activity time, was also investigated. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses are displayed. Data analyses were carried out using RStudio Team (2019, RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc, Boston, MA: http://www.rstudio.com/). P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Relationship between CPC Counts and Adverse Events

All-Cause Mortality

Kaplan Meier curves based on tertiles of CPC counts and all-cause mortality are shown in Figure 1 A-D. In unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models, increases in CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of death (P <0.001, P =0.001; Table 2). Following adjustment, increases in CD34⁺ remained significantly associated with a decrease risk of death (P = 0.036). Whilst there was a trend for CD34⁺CD133⁺ on all-cause mortality this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). No significant associations were observed for all-cause mortality for CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺ EPCs or ECFC (all P > 0.05; Table 2).

View this table:

Table 2. CPC Counts and risk of death for all participants

Figure 1.

Kaplan Meier Survival Curve’s for the relationship between CPC tertile group and all-cause mortality (A, B, C, D) and cardiovascular mortality (E, F, G, H) (Tertile 1 = Low count, Tertile 2 = Moderate count, Tertile 3 = High count). Statistical significance was set at p <0.05.

Cardiovascular Mortality

Kaplan Meier curves based on tertiles of CPC counts and cardiovascular mortality are shown in Figure 1 E-H. In unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models, increases in CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of cardiovascular death (P = 0.008, P = 0.006; Table 2). Following adjustment, CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of cardiovascular death (P = 0.013). Whilst there was a trend for CD34⁺ on CVD mortality this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.055). No other significant associations were observed for CVD mortality (all P > 0.05; Table 2).

Relationship between CPC Counts and Adverse Events-Influence of CVD Status

All-Cause Mortality

Kaplan Meier curves based on tertiles of CPC counts and all-cause mortality for those free of CVD and those with CVD at exam 8 are shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for CPC counts are displayed in Table 3. Following adjustment, increases in CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of death in those with CVD at exam 8 (P = 0.032, P = 0.003). No other significant associations were observed for all-cause mortality (all P > 0.05; Table 3).

View this table:

Table 3. CPC Counts and risk of death for all participants split by CVD diagnosis at exam 8

Cardiovascular Mortality

Kaplan Meier curves based on tertiles of CPC counts and CV mortality for those free of CVD and those with CVD at exam 8 are shown in Supplementary Figure 1. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models for CPC counts and CV mortality are displayed in Table 3. In unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, increases in CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of CV mortality in the CVD present at exam 8 group (all P < 0.05, Table 3). No other significant associations were observed for CV mortality in either of the sub-groups (all P > 0.05).

Cardiovascular Events

Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed in the population free of CVD for incidence of future CV events. ECFCs were significantly associated with a decrease risk of future CV events (P = 0.046, Supplementary Table 1). There was no association between CPC counts and CV event risk for all other measures (all P > 0.05).

Association of Physical Activity with CPC Counts

To assess the association between physical activity and CPC counts, both unadjusted and adjusted linear regressions were performed. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, PAI and moderate + heavy activity hours were not associated with any CPC subset or with ECFC units. However, in the CVD group, after adjusting for confounders, both PAI and moderate + heavy activity time were positively associated with CD34⁺ CPCs, and were the only significant predictors of the number of these cells (Table 4 and Supplementary Table 2). Physical activity was not associated with CD34⁺CD133⁺, CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺ CPCs or ECFC counts, both in univariate and multivariate analyses.

View this table:

Table 4. Association Between Physical Activity Index and CPC Counts

Discussion

Our main findings were that CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were significant predictors of all-cause and CV mortality in the Framingham Offspring cohort, driven primarily by the strength of this association in individuals with CVD. Additionally, increases in self-reported physical activity is positively associated with higher CD34⁺ CPCs in our CVD cohort after adjustment for confounders, a relationship not evident in our CVD free cohort. Together these findings suggest that the observed protection of increased CD34⁺ CPCs on mortality in a diseased population is partly driven by the physical activity levels of individuals.

Several small studies have investigated the prognostic potential of CPCs for predicting incident risk of all-cause and/or CV death. These studies have demonstrated that these cells can predict mortality or clinical end-points in several disease populations, for example patients with coronary artery disease ¹⁸, acute coronary syndromes ⁹, heart failure ⁸, or type 2 diabetes ¹⁹. Our data support these observations, with CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs predictive of all-cause and CV mortality. Interestingly, this association was absent in the CVD-free population, and driven mainly by a strong association with mortality in individuals with pre-diagnosed CVD, suggestive that the prognostic potential of these cells is much stronger in disease populations, and offers little predictive potential, if any, in apparently healthy populations. Interestingly, CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR putative EPCs showed no predictive ability for all-cause or CV death in our study.

In the largest study investigating the role of CPCs on incident risk prediction in a CVD cohort, Patel and colleagues¹⁸ observed that, like our study, only CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs were predictive of mortality. In 2 cohorts, each over 400 patients (n=905 pooled), Patel et al ¹⁸ showed that increases in both these progenitor subsets showed significant inverse association with all-cause and CV-mortality, and that CD34⁺CD133⁺KDR⁺ cells, like our data, showed no association with mortality. Our data in >1700 individuals, however, specifically shows that the associations of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ with all-cause and CV mortality are driven by their prognostic strength in individuals with CVD, and not those who are CVD-free. It is likely that these cells play a more important role in cardiovascular health when the vascular system is in a state of constant damage, and that lower number of these cells in these patients reflect exhaustion of the progenitor cell pool.

Both CD34⁺ and CD133⁺ progenitor cells have vascular regenerative capabilities ²⁰. These cells, reported initially to have pro-angiogenic capabilities due to the potential to differentiate into endothelial cells ¹, most probably work in a paracrine manner, through secretion of vasoactive and proangiogenic factors, such as VEGF and other pro-angiogenic cytokines ²¹. Due to their potential vasculo-reparative capacities, clinical studies have been undertaken to assess their efficacy as cellular therapies to promote recovery of blood flow in myocardial infarction and stroke studies. Clinical studies showing implantation or injection of these cell types show promise in repair of damaged myocardium in animal models ² and in some human studies ^{22, 23}, however due to the expense and research and development required to optimize this cellular therapy, other non-pharmaceutical interventions may be more effective in promoting endogenous vascular repair for clinical benefit. In addition given the reduced number and function of these cells in CVD ⁵, and the predictive association with mortality, it is pertinent to find therapies to augment production, mobilization and function of these cells. Exercise and physical activity has the potential to mobilize these cells into the circulation as evident from acute exercise studies showing transient increases in CPCs in both healthy^{11, 24} and diseased populations ²⁵, although the response to acute exercise is somewhat diminished in CVD patients ²⁶. Long-term physical exercise and physical activity shows promise in increasing number and/or function of these CPCs ²⁷, potentially through promoting bone marrow production of progenitor cell subsets (although the origin of EPCs has been a topic of debate recently²⁸) or via reducing inflammatory or pro-apoptotic stimuli in the circulation ²⁹, thus enhancing survival of these cells in our body. Our data support the use of physical activity to promote or maintain CD34⁺ CPC number in humans. High levels of self-reported physical activity was associated with reduce risk of all-cause and CV mortality (data not shown), and interestingly was associated with higher number of CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD133⁺ CPCs which were also associated with mortality, but only in individuals with CVD, and not in our CVD-free group.

Together these findings suggest that the observed protection of increased CD34⁺ CPCs on mortality in a diseased population is partly driven by the physical activity levels of individuals. These findings maybe clinically relevant as it is supportive of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation and suggests an area for future interventions. Whilst both acute aerobic ²⁴ and resistance exercise ¹¹ can promote progenitor cell release and improve pro-angiogenic function, long-term resistance exercise training studies are lacking and thus warranted, specifically in a CVD cohort.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that CD34⁺ and CD34+CD133⁺ CPCs are predictive of mortality in a large cohort, but with more prognostic potential in individuals with CVD. Additionally, physical activity was associated with significantly greater CD34⁺ CPCs in a CVD population, with no relationship in non-CVD population. Exercise and physical activity may promote vascular health and longevity in CVD patients via promoting CD34⁺ CPC number.

Funding

the author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Edinburgh Napier University’s Research Excellence Grant (M.R). D.M. is supported by the European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme, managed by the Special EU Programmes Body (SEUPB).

Conflict of Interest

The Author(s) declare(s) that there is no conflict of interest.

Authors Contributions

M.R conceived and designed the research. D.M, M.R and J.D undertook statistical analysis of the data. M.R and D.M interpreted results of the experiments, prepared figures and drafted the manuscript; all authors edited and revised the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article were provided by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) under license / by permission. Data will be shared on request to the corresponding author with permission of the NHLBI.

Supplementary information

Data analysis

Data analyses were carried out using RStudio Team (2019, RStudio Team (2019). RSt udio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA: http://www.rstudio.com/) utilising the R core package [1] and the extension packags “dplyr” for data clean ing and transformation [2], “survival” for survival analyses [3] and “ggplot2” [4].and “survminer” [5] for figure generation.

Supplementary Tables and Figures

View this table:

Supplementary Table 1. CPC Counts and risk of future CV events in participants free of CVD diagnosis at exam 8

View this table:

Supplementary Table 2. Association Between Time Spent at Moderate+Heavy Physical Activity and CPC Counts.

Supplementary Figure 1.

Kaplan Meier Survival Curve’s for the relationship between mortality and CPC tertile split by participants free of CVD at exam 8 (A – H) and those diagnosed with CVD at exam 8 (I – P). Curves A-D and I – L are for all-cause mortality and curves E – H and M - P are for CV mortality. (Tertile 1 = Low count, Tertile 2 = Moderate count, Tertile 3 = High count). Statistical significance was set at p <0.05.

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was prepared manuscript was prepared using FRAMOFFSPRING Research Materials obtained from the NHLBI Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the FRAMCOHORT, FRAMOFFSPRING or the NHLBI.

References

1.↵
Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 1997; 275: 964–967. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5302.964.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
2.↵
Ananthaseshan S, Grudzinska MK, Bojakowski K, et al. Locally Transplanted CD34+ Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Contribute to Vascular Healing After Vascular Injury. Transplant Proc 2017; 49: 1467–1476. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.081.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
3.↵
Bruyndonckx L, Hoymans VY, Frederix G, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells and endothelial microparticles are independent predictors of endothelial function. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 300–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.04.015.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
4.↵
Van Craenenbroeck EM, Frederix G, Pattyn N, et al. Effects of aerobic interval training and continuous training on cellular markers of endothelial integrity in coronary artery disease: a SAINTEX-CAD substudy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2015; 309: H1876–1882. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00341.2015.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
5.↵
Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JPJ, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348: 593–600. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022287.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
6.↵
Schmidt-Lucke C, Rossig L, Fichtlscherer S, et al. Reduced number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells predicts future cardiovascular events: proof of concept for the clinical importance of endogenous vascular repair. Circulation 2005; 111: 2981–2987. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.504340.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
7.↵
Fadini GP, Coracina A, Baesso I, et al. Peripheral blood CD34+KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells are determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middleaged general population. Stroke 2006; 37: 2277–2282. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000236064.19293.79.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
8.↵
Samman Tahhan A, Hammadah M, Sandesara PB, et al. Progenitor Cells and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail 2017; 10. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004106.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
9.↵
Samman Tahhan AS, Hammadah M, Raad M, et al. Progenitor Cells and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation Research 2018. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312821.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
10.↵
Seals DR, Nagy EE and Moreau KL. Aerobic exercise training and vascular function with ageing in healthy men and women. The Journal of Physiology 2019; 597: 4901–4914. DOI: 10.1113/jp277764.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
11.↵
Ross MD, Wekesa AL, Phelan JP, et al. Resistance exercise increases endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenic factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 16–23. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a142da.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
12.↵
Steiner S, Niessner A, Ziegler S, et al. Endurance training increases the number of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with cardiovascular risk and coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2005; 181: 305–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.006.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
13.↵
Kannel WB and Gordan T. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in the elderly: the Framingham study. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 1978; 54: 573–591.
OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
14.↵
Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara P, et al. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: The Framingham Offspring Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 1979; 110: 281–290. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112813.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
15.↵
Cheng S, Wang N, Larson MG, et al. Circulating angiogenic cell populations, vascular function, and arterial stiffness. Atherosclerosis 2012; 220: 145–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.10.015.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
16.↵
Kannel WB and Sorlie P. Some Health Benefits of Physical Activity: The Framingham Study. Archives of Internal Medicine 1979; 139: 857–861. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1979.03630450011006.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
17.
Wilson PWF, Paffenbarger RS, Morris JN, et al. Assessment methods for physical activity and physical fitness in population studies: Report of a NHLBI workshop. American Heart Journal 1986; 111: 1177-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(86)90022-0.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
18.↵
Patel RS, Li Q, Ghasemzadeh N, et al. Circulating CD34+ progenitor cells and risk of mortality in a population with coronary artery disease. Circ Res 2015; 116: 289–297. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304187.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
19.↵
Egan CG, Fondelli C, Pierantozzi E, et al. Putative endothelial progenitor cells predict long-term mortality in type-2 diabetes. Endocrine 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1695-0.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
20.↵
Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34+ cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood 2000; 95: 952–958.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
21.↵
Hur J, Yoon C-H, Kim H-S, et al. Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 288–293. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000114236.77009.06.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
22.↵
Nasseri BA, Ebell W, Dandel M, et al. Autologous CD133+ bone marrow cells and bypass grafting for regeneration of ischaemic myocardium: the Cardio133 trial. European Heart Journal 2014. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu007.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
23.↵
Quyyumi AA, Vasquez A, Kereiakes DJ, et al. PreSERVE-AMI: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Intracoronary Administration of Autologous CD34+ Cells in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Post STEMI Circulation Research 2017; 120: 324–331. DOI: doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308165.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
24.↵
Nederveen JP, Baker J, Ibrahim G, et al. Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell (HSPC) Mobilization Responses to Different Exercise Intensities in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-019-00050-4.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
25.↵
Adams V, Lenk K, Linke A, et al. Increase of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with coronary artery disease after exercise-induced ischemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 684–690. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000124104.23702.a0.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
26.↵
Moazzami K, Lima BB, Hammadah M, et al. Association Between Change in Circulating Progenitor Cells During Exercise Stress and Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiology 2020; 5: 147–155. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4528.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
27.↵
Cavalcante SL, Lopes S, Bohn L, et al. Effects of exercise on endothelial progenitor cells in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.02.016.
Google Scholar
28.↵
Fujisawa T, Tura-Ceide O, Hunter A, et al. Endothelial Progenitor Cells Do Not Originate From the Bone Marrow. Circulation 2019; 140: 1524–1526. DOI: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042351.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar
29.↵
Cesari F, Marcucci R, Gori AM, et al. Impact of a cardiac rehabilitation program and inflammatory state on endothelial progenitor cells in acute coronary syndrome patients. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 1854–1859. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.157.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[1].↵
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar
[2].↵
Hadley Wickham, Romain François, Lionel Henry and Kirill Müller (2020). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
Google Scholar
[3].↵
Therneau T (2020). _A Package for Survival Analysis in R_. R package version 3. 1-12, <URL:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival>.
Google Scholar
[4].↵
H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2016. <URL: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org>.
Google Scholar
[5].↵
Alboukadel Kassambara, Marcin Kosinski and Przemyslaw Biecek (2019). surv miner: Drawing Survival Curves using ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer
Google Scholar

Comments

medRxiv aims to provide a venue for anyone to comment on a medRxiv preprint. Comments are moderated for offensive or irrelevant content (this can take ~24 h). Please avoid duplicate submissions and read our Comment Policy before commenting. The content of a comment is not endorsed by medRxiv.

Community Reviews

medRxiv aims to inform readers about online discussion of this preprint occurring elsewhere. The content at the links below is not endorsed by either medRxiv or the preprint's authors.

Community reviews for this article:

There are no community reviews for this paper.

Automated Evaluations

Certain services provide automated analysis of preprints. Analyses invited by the authors are displayed at the top of this tab. Those done independently of authors are shown underneath . None of these analyses is endorsed by medRxiv.

Automated Evaluations:

There are no automated evaluations for this paper.

[1] 1.↵
Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 1997; 275: 964–967. DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5302.964.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[2] 2.↵
Ananthaseshan S, Grudzinska MK, Bojakowski K, et al. Locally Transplanted CD34+ Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Contribute to Vascular Healing After Vascular Injury. Transplant Proc 2017; 49: 1467–1476. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.081.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] 3.↵
Bruyndonckx L, Hoymans VY, Frederix G, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells and endothelial microparticles are independent predictors of endothelial function. J Pediatr 2014; 165: 300–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.04.015.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[4] 4.↵
Van Craenenbroeck EM, Frederix G, Pattyn N, et al. Effects of aerobic interval training and continuous training on cellular markers of endothelial integrity in coronary artery disease: a SAINTEX-CAD substudy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2015; 309: H1876–1882. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00341.2015.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[5] 5.↵
Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JPJ, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348: 593–600. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022287.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[6] 6.↵
Schmidt-Lucke C, Rossig L, Fichtlscherer S, et al. Reduced number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells predicts future cardiovascular events: proof of concept for the clinical importance of endogenous vascular repair. Circulation 2005; 111: 2981–2987. DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.504340.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[7] 7.↵
Fadini GP, Coracina A, Baesso I, et al. Peripheral blood CD34+KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells are determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middleaged general population. Stroke 2006; 37: 2277–2282. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000236064.19293.79.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[8] 8.↵
Samman Tahhan A, Hammadah M, Sandesara PB, et al. Progenitor Cells and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail 2017; 10. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004106.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[9] 9.↵
Samman Tahhan AS, Hammadah M, Raad M, et al. Progenitor Cells and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation Research 2018. DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312821.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] 10.↵
Seals DR, Nagy EE and Moreau KL. Aerobic exercise training and vascular function with ageing in healthy men and women. The Journal of Physiology 2019; 597: 4901–4914. DOI: 10.1113/jp277764.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] 11.↵
Ross MD, Wekesa AL, Phelan JP, et al. Resistance exercise increases endothelial progenitor cells and angiogenic factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014; 46: 16–23. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a142da.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] 12.↵
Steiner S, Niessner A, Ziegler S, et al. Endurance training increases the number of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with cardiovascular risk and coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2005; 181: 305–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.006.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[13] 13.↵
Kannel WB and Gordan T. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in the elderly: the Framingham study. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 1978; 54: 573–591.
OpenUrl PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[14] 14.↵
Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara P, et al. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: The Framingham Offspring Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 1979; 110: 281–290. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112813.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[15] 15.↵
Cheng S, Wang N, Larson MG, et al. Circulating angiogenic cell populations, vascular function, and arterial stiffness. Atherosclerosis 2012; 220: 145–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.10.015.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] 16.↵
Kannel WB and Sorlie P. Some Health Benefits of Physical Activity: The Framingham Study. Archives of Internal Medicine 1979; 139: 857–861. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1979.03630450011006.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[17] 17.
Wilson PWF, Paffenbarger RS, Morris JN, et al. Assessment methods for physical activity and physical fitness in population studies: Report of a NHLBI workshop. American Heart Journal 1986; 111: 1177-1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(86)90022-0.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar

[18] 18.↵
Patel RS, Li Q, Ghasemzadeh N, et al. Circulating CD34+ progenitor cells and risk of mortality in a population with coronary artery disease. Circ Res 2015; 116: 289–297. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304187.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[19] 19.↵
Egan CG, Fondelli C, Pierantozzi E, et al. Putative endothelial progenitor cells predict long-term mortality in type-2 diabetes. Endocrine 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1695-0.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] 20.↵
Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34+ cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood 2000; 95: 952–958.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[21] 21.↵
Hur J, Yoon C-H, Kim H-S, et al. Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 288–293. DOI: 10.1161/01.atv.0000114236.77009.06.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[22] 22.↵
Nasseri BA, Ebell W, Dandel M, et al. Autologous CD133+ bone marrow cells and bypass grafting for regeneration of ischaemic myocardium: the Cardio133 trial. European Heart Journal 2014. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu007.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[23] 23.↵
Quyyumi AA, Vasquez A, Kereiakes DJ, et al. PreSERVE-AMI: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Intracoronary Administration of Autologous CD34+ Cells in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Post STEMI Circulation Research 2017; 120: 324–331. DOI: doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.308165.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[24] 24.↵
Nederveen JP, Baker J, Ibrahim G, et al. Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell (HSPC) Mobilization Responses to Different Exercise Intensities in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s42978-019-00050-4.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] 25.↵
Adams V, Lenk K, Linke A, et al. Increase of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with coronary artery disease after exercise-induced ischemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 684–690. DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000124104.23702.a0.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar

[26] 26.↵
Moazzami K, Lima BB, Hammadah M, et al. Association Between Change in Circulating Progenitor Cells During Exercise Stress and Risk of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiology 2020; 5: 147–155. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4528.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] 27.↵
Cavalcante SL, Lopes S, Bohn L, et al. Effects of exercise on endothelial progenitor cells in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2019.02.016.
Google Scholar

[28] 28.↵
Fujisawa T, Tura-Ceide O, Hunter A, et al. Endothelial Progenitor Cells Do Not Originate From the Bone Marrow. Circulation 2019; 140: 1524–1526. DOI: doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042351.
OpenUrl CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] 29.↵
Cesari F, Marcucci R, Gori AM, et al. Impact of a cardiac rehabilitation program and inflammatory state on endothelial progenitor cells in acute coronary syndrome patients. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 1854–1859. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.157.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

Circulating CD34⁺ Progenitor Cells are Predictive of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality and are Influenced by Physical Activity.

Abstract

Introduction