Insufficient social distancing may be related to COVID-19 outbreak: the case of Ijuí city in Brazil

Introduction

At the end of 2019, some cases of pneumonia of “unknown cause” were noticed by the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission (China) [1]. Collected bronchoalveolar-lavage samples were consistent with an RNA virus of the Coronaviridae family [2]. Thereafter, The World Health Organization named the novel infectious pneumonia as “coronavirus disease 2019” or COVID-19 [3]. COVID-19 had proven to be highly contagious by the time it reached approximately 300 cases in China in January 2020 [4]. Thus, it became an epidemic case, with more than 44,000 infections and more than 1,000 deaths in China, with 441 cases outside China in 24 countries [5].

The first case of COVID-19 in Brazil was reported on February 27^th in the city of São Paulo. Based on published events, eight of the twenty-seven National Federation Units present cumulative mortality rates above 10 per 100,000 inhabitants: four in the North, two in the Northeast, and two in the Southeast Region (Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo) [6]. In the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), the southernmost State in Brazil (with 11.3 million people), the first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed on February 29^th 2020. As of August 6^th, 76,563 confirmed cases (673 per 100,000 inhabitants), and 2,163 deaths (19 per 100,000 inhabitants, 2.8% of confirmed cases) had been reported [7,8].

Therefore, in the RS, a population-based survey in nine sentinel cities (EPICOVID-RS) was conducted in a period from April to June [8] and included the city of Ijuí, which is localized in the Northwestern region of the state, with a population of 83,475 inhabitants. In this survey, we tested 2,500 subjects for the presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 divided into five rounds (5 with ~500 subjects each), indicating that the seroprevalence was undetectable (0 positive cases) on April 12^th (round 1), and increased to 0,042%[7,8]. Questions regarding social distancing adherence (SDA) and daily preventive routine (DPR) were answered by the subjects who participated in the survey [8]. In parallel, the local government registers and turns public the official COVID-19 cases in Ijuí (for details, see the official government website [9]), while the mobile social distancing index (MSDI) in Ijuí was monitored by means of data collected from mobile geolocation [10].

Since there are still no pharmaceutical treatments available, interventions have focused on quarantine and social distancing. The aim of these strategies is to slow down the spread of infection and reduce the intensity of the transmission (a.k.a “flatten the curve”)[11]. The Wuhan outbreak indicates that critical care capacities can be exceeded many times if distancing measures are not implemented quickly or strongly enough [12]. An effective social distancing strategy and monitoring may reduce the risk of an overwhelming the health system, allowing adequate patient care and decreasing mortality rates [12]. Thus, considering the local COVID-19 data and the social distancing behavior registered, we showed that low levels of social distancing were not enough to avoid the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in Ijuí.

Materials and Methods

Results

The daily MSDI computed using data from mobile monitoring for the city of Ijuí is showed in Figure 1A. The period of monitoring revealed that on the first day of mobile monitoring, the MSDI was 30.7% (Saturday) and reached 39.3% on Sunday (February 2^nd) and decreased to 27.5% in the first working day registered (February 3^rd). These data describe the normal social behavior in Ijuí, which remained with few fluctuations in average until mid-March, when it scales up to 70.2% on Sunday, (March 22^th) and sustained between 50% and 55% on subsequently working days. However, at the end of June, the MSDI decreased to 31.4% (on June 19^th), reaching the lowest value since the first case in the city (registered as March 18^th, see Figure 1B). The last register in working data showed 35.3% of MSDI. For a fair comparison, percentages pointed above the open circles on Figure 1A correspond to MSDI on weekends, whereas the closed circles correspond to MSDI on working days. Thus, it is possible to observe that there is naturally an increase in distancing due to the fact that more people tend to stay in their homes on weekends. However, the decrease in MSDI may be observed, including on weekends since was registered a 70.2% on March 22^nd, while this level decreased to 48.2% on June 21^st. From a macro point of view, it is evident that the population of Ijuí is leaving distancing and increasing its social interaction up to the end of June.

The first COVID-19 case in Ijuí (Figure 1B) started to feel symptomatic on March 18^th (diagnosed after that). It is possible to observe that until May 17^th, there was a slight increase in the number of cases registered in Ijuí (Figure 1B). However, on June 7^th, there was a 2.1-fold increase in total COVID-19 cases. The profile of the confirmed cases revealed that 52.4% of the COVID-19 cases in Ijuí occurred in women and 47.7% in men, and the majority of cases (86%) are younger than 60 years old (Figure 1C). Until the end of June, Ijuí presented a 9,5% hospitalization of positive COVID-19 cases, which 74.1% are older than 50 years, and there was no hospitalization in subjects younger than 30 years old. The majority (70.4%, n = 19) of the hospitalized cases are men in comparison with women (29.6%, n = 8). Also, until the end of June, there was just one death caused by COVID-19 in Ijuí (men, 85 years-old, oncologic patient with diabetes and hypertension). The urban distribution of COVID-19 cases in Ijuí indicates that approximately 30% are downtown inhabitants (Supplementary material, Figure S1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Mobile social distancing index and COVID-19 cases in Ijuí-Brazil.

A) Mobile Social distancing index (MSDI) B) Total and new weekly COVID-19 cases C) Distribution of COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations by age.

In each round of the population-based survey, more than 400 adults were inquired and tested to the presence of Sars-Cov-2 antibodies, totalizing 2,222 subjects included in the study. Characteristics of the subjects are described in Supplementary material Table 1 and Table 2 as supplementary material. The social distancing population-based survey started on April 12^th, and revealed that the majority of the subjects declared high SDA to the recommendations (Figure 2A). However, it is possible to observe a decrease in the proportion of subjects that declared adherent to social distancing (high adherence) in parallel to the increase of the proportion that partially adheres to social distancing (Figure 2A). Similarly, the proportion of the subjects that stayed at home during all the time or declared go out only for essential needs has decreased, while there was an increase in the number of people that declared went out their home daily for work (Figure 2B). Thus, it is possible to observe that there was a decrease in the MSDI just 15 days after the first round, which remains to decrease until the end of May (blue lines in Figure 2C). In contrast, there was a significant increase in the number of COVID-19 cases in Ijuí in the period of May to June (red line, Figure 2C), which may evocate a recovered of SDA and DPR approximately one month later (June) (blue lines in Figure 2C).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Social distancing adherence, daily preventive routine, and mobile social isolation index association with COVID-19 cases in Ijuí-Brazil.

A) Social distancing adherence indicated in the population-based survey study. B) Daily preventive routine indicated in the population-based survey study C) Association between total COVID-19 and social distancing data.

We have also analyzed two scenarios to estimate the number of cases in Ijuí after May 17^th (Figure 3A): First, a sustained controlled community infection represented by a linear trend (green line in Figure 3A, estimated by the equation y = 1.416667x −1.416667, R² = 0.848, P = 0.0004); second, an uncontrolled outbreak community infection in Ijuí, represented by an exponential progression in the number of cases (blue line in Figure 3B, y = 1.351649 - (−0.2424262/-0.3155474).(1 - ^{e^(+0.3155474x)}, R² = 0.955, P = 0.00019). Worryingly, the number of real cases registered (red line in Figure 3A) was higher than estimated by linear and exponential prediction, since 277 COVID-19 cases registered in Ijuí until July 7^th, while the estimative predicted 23 and 120 COVID-19 cases by linear and exponential equations, respectively. Thus, since the exponential estimative (blue line) showed that Ijuí could reach 1,000 cases on August 23^rd, the anticipation of this scenario, marked by the real registered COVID-19 cases, indicates a risk to overwhelm the public health system in Ijuí.

Considering the real scenario in the context of the 100^th case of COVID-19 in Ijuí, we analyzed the predictions for the following months after that. It is possible to estimate a great effect on the number of subjects exposed to coronavirus in the next two months, with higher levels of infected subjects, hospitalization, and deaths, if the transmission rate is maintained, while would have a great benefit if decreases the transmission rate as soon as possible, mainly if reach controllable levels. In this worst scenario (R₀ = 2.79), the overwhelm of public and private health care systems is evident since it would more than 4,000 hospitalizations cases simultaneously and more than 1,500 deaths in the following 120 days (Figure 3B). In contrast, if the transmission rate of COVID-19 is reduced by 50%, precisely 30 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 1.40), it is expected a moderate decrease in the impact on the healthcare system (Figure 3C). For further protection, we analyzed the impact on the transmission rate of COVID-19 if the population reduces by 50% (R_t = 1.40), precisely 15 days after the 100^th case (Figure 3D). Thus, the exposed subjects would decrease, reducing the peak of infected subjects to 1,314, expected to occur in 66 days. Consequently, the peak of hospitalization would be later, close to three months after the 100^th case (85^th day), with 1,582 subjects, resulting in 862 deaths in 120 days. If we consider the RS transmission rate document (R₀ = 1.44) without any alteration after the 100^th case would be found a higher number of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths peaking after two months (Figure 3E). However, if the transmission rate of COVID-19 is reduced by 50%, precisely 30 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 0.79), it is expected a considerable decrease in the impact on the healthcare system, with 156 daily cases in the peak (34^th day) and 120 hospitalizations by day two months after the 100^th case, and 62 deaths in 120 days (Figure 3F). Finally, a significant decrease would be expected if the transmission rate of COVID-19 reduces by 50% (R_t = 0.79) precisely 15 days after the 100^th case (Figure 3G): the infection peak would reach 75 simultaneous cases and 52 hospitalizations, resulting in 27 deaths. The proportion of the whole population that needs recovered decreased from approximately 82.0% in the worst prediction to 1.37% in the best one. In detail, in the last prediction, considering a reduction of 50% in the transmission rates, if applied 15 days after the 100^th case, approximately 98.7% of the population of Ijuí would remain without infection, and approximately 1.37% would be recovered (1,162 subjects).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Predictions for COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in Ijuí-Brazil

A) Difference between real cases and predictions of COVID-19 using linear regression (green line) and exponential equation (Blue line). B) Predictions without any new intervention after the 100^th case (R₀ = 2.79). C) Predictions after implementing strategies that reduce 50% in the transmission rate 30 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 1.40). D) Predictions after implementing strategies that reduce 50% in the transmission rate 15 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 1.40). E) Predictions without any new intervention after the 100^th case (R₀ = 1.44). F) Predictions after implementing strategies that reduce 50% in the transmission rate 30 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 0.79). G) Predictions after implementing strategies that reduce 50% in the transmission rate 15 days after the 100^th case (R_t = 0.79). All predictions were performed in the epidemic simulator free app from São Paulo University. Available on https://ciis.fmrp.usp.br/covid19/epcalc/public/index.html

Discussion

Our study described the SDA, DPR, MSDI, predictions, and the progression of COVID-19 cases in Ijuí (Brazil). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that described the social distancing behavior of the community based on a population-survey procedure together mobile monitoring data, that preceded the COVID-19 outbreak. Also, it is the first report regarding estimative of the progression of the disease in the city.

During February, the city of Ijuí, as well as its neighboring cities, have not registered any case of COVID-19 in their population. The first case registered in the estate of RS, to which Ijuí belongs, was in the city of Campo Bom, 402 km away from Ijuí, and very close to the capital of the estate (Porto Alegre), on March 10^th. The first case of COVID-19 registered in Ijuí dates back to March 18^th, when the patient started to feel symptomatic. Note that, only after eight days Ijuí joined the official counting of cases, and, most probably, the absence of cases before this date explains the non-change in the percentage of social distancing (respected its natural peaks on Sundays).

On March 19^th the city administration issued its most restrict decree in the analyzed period, which restricted public transport, closed stores, suspended classes at public and private schools and university, and established protocols for restaurants and other services for one week [9]. This is evidenced when on March 22^nd the MSDI reached its highest value, by 70.2%. After that, other decrees were also issued, but with relaxing restrictions. In parallel, the Federal Government of Brazil has been minimizing this pandemic and, in most cases, stimulating the population to keep their regular routine [21]. Thus, after the highest social distancing already registered, it is possible to observe a continuous reduction of the distancing, to the point that at the end of June, we have a value very close to that recorded at the beginning of the analyzed period, when there were no cases in Ijuí and not even in Brazil [22,23].

In the last days of June, it is possible to observe a slight increase in the distancing, most probably a consequence of a high number of new cases reported in the second half of June, which have demanded the city administration to review its protocols and be stricter [9]. The mean of the MSDI for the total period of mobile monitoring is 38.5%. If we take into consideration that was classified as “stayed at home” when the mobile did not move more than 450m (radius) [10], it is possible that the actual social distancing level in Ijuí most probably rounds below 30% in regular times, since this distance allows neighborhood social interactions, including small markets, which strongly points that the social distancing is currently low in the city.

Our results about SDA and DPR may be related to the official recommendations by local and state governments. The state of RS has implemented since May 10^th, the “Controlled Social Distancing Model” (CSDM), to avoid the COVID-19 outbreak considering recommendations for economic activities. In color flags, which ranges from a yellow flag (to represent a low risk to infection and high health care capacity) to a black flag (to represent a high risk of transmission rate and high occupation rates in the hospitals and intensive care units). Thus, since May 10^th, every city is classified according to this model to represent the progression of the COVID-19 outbreak [7]. Ijuí was set as a yellow flag from May 10^th to June 8^th, when it became orange (one level above of risk) because of the rapid increase in the number of cases (95 new cases) and the hospitalization rates in one week (1 to 5 subjects) and then decreased the recovered-to-active ratio cases in Ijuí. Also, it was noticed one death and decreased in the intensive care unit vacancy. As a local initiative to counteract the COVID-19 outbreak, the Ijuí Municipal Decree number 7.107 (of June 16^th) improved the recommendations to avoid community transmission [9]. In detail, the decree allows the maintenance of regular service in restaurants (between 7 a.m and 23 p.m.) with reduced capacity, while snack bars and coffee shops were allowed to work only in the delivery or drive-thru mode. The non-essential commercial was authorized to operate; however, they can only receive one customer per employee, respecting the limits established in the occupation and operation protocols. It is allowed to operate the facilities of sports clubs exclusively for the physical conditioning of the respective contracted professional athletes, observing the minimum distance of two meters between them. Physical contact or agglomerations being prohibited in any case [9]. Thus, the measured social distancing in Ijuí may be in accordance with theses official recommendations but was insufficient to avoid the rapid increase in the number of COVID-19 cases. (For Ijuí urban geographic details, please see Supplementary material figure S1, with geographic localization of COVID-19 cases in June and August).

Social distancing measures adopted by the population appear effective, mainly when implemented in conjunction with the distancing of cases and quarantining of contacts [19,24]. Our data showed that preventive behavior, related to the SDA recommendation and DPR, did not reach 70% of social distancing in any of the four steps of the survey. We mentioned this goal since it was proposed early that maintaining the capacity of social distancing at a maximum of 76% could avoid the death of 90,000 individuals and the overwhelm of the intensive care units in São Paulo (Brazil)[25]. Nowadays, São Paulo registered more than 20,000 COVID-19 cases and 9,00 deaths [23], suggesting that maintaining and strengthening current social distancing measures, quarantining and isolating cases, is absolutely vital to avoid the collapse of the healthcare systems in the country. Also, it has been suggested that a more restrictive recommendation can be more effective in reducing the number of infected subjects [1,25–28].

At the end of June, Brazil reached more than 1.4 million COVID-19 cases [22,23]. The state of RS provides data about COVID-19, which computes on date June 30^th 26,941 COVID-19 cases, representing a mean of incidence in the state of 344 cases per 100,000 inhabitants [7]. From June to July, RS decreased the hospitalization rate from 13% to 11%, while increased the death proportion from 2.3 to 2,5% (nowadays reached 8,5 per 100,000 inhabitants). If we consider the same rates of cases, hospitalization, and deaths, Ijuí could have 287 cases, 31 hospitalizations and 7 deaths. In fact, the number of cases (n = 283) is similar than RS prevalence, however, Ijuí has less hospitalizations (n = 27) and deaths (n = 1), and Ijuí ends the month of June with 80.8% intensive care units occupied, with three COVID-19 patients [7,9].

We compare our “optimistic” prediction (reducing by 50%, R = 0.79) for 120 days after the 100^th COVID-19 case with the nowadays Ijuí presented COVID-19 profile: the infection peak was predicted with 75 simultaneous cases and with 52 hospitalizations, however, Ijuí has now (August 6^th means ~60 days after the 100^th COVID-19 case) 156 subjects under recovering and 8 hospitalized patients (the total of hospitalized patients until now was 49 of hospitalizations, which means 9,4% of cases). Also, our predictions showed that 120 days after the 100^th COVID-19 case, Ijuí would have a total of 27 deaths. Until now, it was registered five deaths. This comparison allows us to infer that the population followed the recommendations to avoid the transmission of the coronavirus, at least in part, since real cases, hospitalizations and deaths are approximately as predicted by a reduction in the transmission rate below 1.0 (R = 0.79).

In our study, we showed the profile of hospitalizations by age and sex, and also informed the profile of the subject that was fatally affected by coronavirus. Thus, our study and up-to-date COVID-19 data preliminary indicates an increased risk for developing a severe form of COVID-19 related to the presence of comorbidities, advanced age, and sex (men). It is remarkable that pre-existing comorbidities are strikingly evident (about half of patients), hypertension being the most prevalent (30 %), followed by diabetes (19 %), coronary heart disease (8 %) and 3% of individuals presenting previous pulmonary condition, such as chronic obstructive lung disease [29,30]. COVID 19 patients bearing previous comorbidities were also among those with highest mortality rates, with adjusted OR of 7.42 (CI95%: 6.33-8.79) for hypertensive patients, 9.03 (CI95%: 7.39-11.35) for diabetic subjects, 12.83 (CI95%: 10.27-15.86) for coronary heart disease, while for chronic obstructive lung disease OR is 7.79 (CI95%: 5.54-10.43) [31]. Also, it was reported that 31 % of cases, 45 % of hospitalizations, 53 % of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and 80 % of deaths occurred among subjects aged 65 years or older [32]. In the same direction, the case-fatality rates among individuals aged 80 years or older are approximately 20% [33]. It is noteworthy the discrepancy between males (ca. 60 %) and females at the admission in hospitals. Among non-survivors, this difference is even bigger: ca. 70 % are men [1]. In the Lombardy Region, Italy, these figures are still more impressive: 82 % of the patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) were older men [32]. The increased risk of this profile (male, older and cardiovascular disease subject) may be related to an impaired immune-metabolism cell stress response. Thus, these subjects cannot resolve virus-induced inflammatory burst physiologically (since there is no medicine) being susceptible to exacerbated forms of inflammation [34], which leads to a fatal “cytokine storm” [35,36]. Thus, it is necessary to observe in future studies the adherence to a protective behavior linked to social distancing associated with the presence of comorbidities [3,37]. The preventive behavior in older subjects and people with chronic diseases in the community may avoid higher levels of hospitalization or high mortality rates.

Conclusion

The insufficient social distancing registered in the population-based study may be related to the rapid increase of COVID-19 cases in Ijuí. These data predict a closer outbreak of community infection of COVID-19, which could be avoided or attenuated if the levels of the social distancing of population increase in the next weeks.

Author Contributions

All authors coordinated the five waves of the population-based study performed in Ijuí integrated with EPICOVID-RS study, collecting data about social distancing (exception, MSL and RZF). TGH, RZF, EMB, and MSL performed the analyses and predictions of the COVID19 case, analyzed the governmental decrees, and wrote the manuscript. MAM produced the sociodemographic and EPICOVID-RS data descriptions. TGH and RZF wrote the manuscript. TGH prepared the figures. All authors were involved in analyzing the results and approved the submitted and published versions.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests regarding financial, academic, professional, or commercial issues.

Financial support

Coordination and Improvement of Higher Level or Education Personnel (Capes), Rio Grande do Sul State government, Federal University of Pelotas, and Regional University of Northwestern Rio Grande do Sul State (UNIJUÍ) supported this study.