ABSTRACT
Aerosol droplets have emerged as the primary mode of SARS-Cov-2 transmission and can be spread by infectious asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic persons rendering indicators of latent viral infection essential. Olfactory impairment is now a recognized symptom of COVID-19 and is rapidly becoming one of the most reliable indicators of the disease. We compared olfaction data from asymptomatic students, who were assessed as SARS-CoV-2 was unknowingly spreading locally, to students tested prior to the arrival of the virus. This study was naturalistic by design as testing occurred in the context of four research studies, all of which used the same inclusion/exclusion criteria and the same protocol to objectively assess odor detection, identification, and hedonics with physiological tests. Data from students (Cohort II; N=22) with probable SARS-CoV-2 exposure were compared to students tested just prior to local virus transmission (Cohort I; N=25), and a normative sample of students assessed over the previous four years (N=272). Students in Cohort II demonstrated significantly reduced odor detection sensitivity compared to students in Cohort I (t=2.60; P=.01; d=0.77; CI, 0.17, 1.36), with a distribution skewed towards reduced detection sensitivity (D=0.38; P=.005). Categorically, the exposed group was significantly more likely to have hyposmia (OR=7.74; CI, 3.1, 19.40), particularly the subgroup assessed in the final week before campus closure (OR=13.61; CI, 3.40, 35.66;). The exposed cohort also rated odors as less unpleasant (P<.001, CLES=0.77). A limitation of our study is that participants were not tested for COVID-19 as testing was unavailable in the area. Objective measures of olfaction may detect olfactory impairment in asymptomatic persons who are otherwise unaware of smell loss. The development of cost-effective, objective olfaction tests that could be self-administered regularly could aid in early detection of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, which is vital to combatting this pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by: University of Dayton Research Council Grants-in-Aid IGRU16, IGRV16 (JWM) and NIMH R01MH110418(DM).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The studies in this report were approved by the University of Dayton Institutional Review board as expedited, and have been renewed yearly.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
List of Abbreviations Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2); Center for Disease Control (CDC); common language effect size (CLES); confidence interval (CI); coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (K-S); Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV); nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT); odds ratio (OR); severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2); World Health Organization (WHO)
Minor edits made to Introduction to update the literature; minor changes were made to the participants section for clarity; the Public Health Records section was moved to the Participants section; edits were made to the Statistics section to clarify why certain tests were used and that the data was normally distributed; the distribution fits were moved to the Odor Detection Results section; minor edits were made to the discussion to incorporate new findings. None of the results changed.
Data Availability
We are willing share the data presented in this manuscript.
