Abstract
Cobb’s traditional method for measuring the angle of scoliosis is complicated and error-prone in application. Angles measured with this method are inaccurate and it therefore stands to reason to search for improved procedures.
We propose Cobb’s angle to be determined by two novel methods: the distance method and the two-angle method. Using mathematical error analysis and experimental test measurings we demonstrate that the two proposed methods offer significant advantages over the current standard. They simplify the measurement process and increase outcome accuracy.
For Cobb’s angles larger than 30 degrees, the two-angle method reduces the error-variation by approx. 25%. For Cobb’s angles below 30 degrees the distance method reduces the error-variation by approx. 50%.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Experimental measurings with students were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the oversight body.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.