On the increasing role of older adolescents and younger adults during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Mexico

INTRODUCTION

The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Mexico is growing, with 1,070,487 cases and 103,597 deaths recorded by November 25^th, 2020 [1]. In Mexico, on March 23^rd (and until May 30^th) a call for a nationwide lock-down was made [2,3]. On June 1^st, Mexico implemented post-lockdown mitigation strategies that depending on community transmission and hospital capacity, eased some of the initial restrictions [4]. To understand the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 under different mitigation strategies, it is important to study the role that different age groups have played on propagating the spread of the virus. Variations in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by age may take place during the course of an epidemic due to changing mixing patterns [5], which in turn has implications for epidemic control.

Evidence has accumulated that susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection increases with age [6, 7]. Yet, this does not suggest that the oldest groups in a population necessarily play the leading role in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the community. Actually, several serological studies suggest that adolescents and younger adults often experience the highest cumulative rates of infection [8-15]. In England, the highest rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Fall of 2020 are in persons aged 18-24y and 13-17y (Figure 8 in [16]). Under the physical distancing measures implemented in Mexico, mixing patterns for individuals in different age groups may be quite different compared to regular mixing patterns [5,6]. Also, similar to other low- and middle-income countries, a sizeable proportion of Mexico’s population are relatively young informal workers who live from day to day for whom shelter-in-place policies may represent a significant economic burden. It is unknown what role do younger adults/older adolescents and other age groups play in propagating the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Mexico. To address this question, we estimate temporal changes in SARS-CoV-2 incidence by age group during and after the national lockdown period. We applied the methodology developed previously [17-19] to assess the temporal changes in the incidence of different age groups of individuals between the age of 10-59 years during the epidemic in Mexico.

METHODS

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the number of hospitalizations with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the different age groups (10-14 through 55-59 years) for the early lockdown (April 20–May 3, 2020), the late lockdown (May 18-31, 2020) and the post-lockdown (June 15-28, 2020) periods, as well as the corresponding estimates of the PR statistic (equations 1,2).

For the late lockdown period vs. the early lockdown, the highest PR (95% CI) estimates belong to persons aged 15-19 years (PR=1.69(1.05, 2.72)) and 20-24 years (PR=1.43(1.10,1.86)) (Table 1). The PR estimates in persons aged over 30 years were significantly lower compared to persons aged 15-24 years. Table 2 gives the estimates of ORs for different pairs of age groups (10-14y through 55-59y) for a hospitalized case with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to be during the period May 18-31 vs. April 20-May 3 (equation 4). Our results suggest that for persons aged 15-24y, the corresponding OR relative to any age group over 30y is above 1.

For the post-lockdown period vs. the early lockdown, the highest PR (95% CI) estimates belong to persons aged 15-19 years (PR=2.05(1.30, 3.24)) and 20-24 years (PR=1.49(1.15,1.93)) (Table 1). The PR estimates in persons aged over 30 years were significantly lower compared to persons aged 15-24 years. Table 3 shows the estimates of ORs during the post-lockdown period of June 15-28 vs. the lockdown period April 20-May 3. The corresponding OR for persons aged 15-24y relative to any age group over 30y is significantly above 1 for the post-lockdown period compared to the early lockdown period. This suggests a relative increase in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in persons aged 15-24y compared to persons aged 30-59y for the post-lockdown period relative to the early lockdown period.

DISCUSSION

We applied the previously developed methodology [17-19] to study changes in the relative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in different age groups during national lockdown and post-lockdown mitigation in Mexico. Compared with early lockdown, the greatest relative increase in the incidence of infection belongs to persons aged 15-24 years in both, the late lockdown and post-lockdown mitigation. We note that in England, the highest rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Fall of 2020 are in persons aged 18-24y and 13-17y (Figure 8 in [16]), which is consistent with our findings about the epidemiological importance of older adolescents and younger adults during the epidemic.

We hypothesize there are two potential explanations for the increase in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in older adolescents and younger adults in Mexico: (i) the need for young informal workers to return to work due to increasing economic burden of physical distancing measures; (ii) fatigue related to adherence to the physical distancing measures, resulting in progressively lesser adherence. Other explanations, such as changing social responsibilities and increased use of public transportation may also apply, and further work is needed to understand those issues to better inform future mitigation efforts. A serological evaluation is underway which may confirm our observations.

Our results are consistent with observations in Germany, where using the same methodology, a higher relative incidence of infection in older adolescents and younger adults following the introduction of physical distancing measures was found [17]. In Spain, using the same methodology as in [17], it was shown that during the initial lockdown period, when non-essential work was allowed, individuals aged 40-64 years had a higher relative incidence of infection compared with the pre-lockdown period. However, during the later strengthened lockdown, older adolescents and younger adults had an increased relative incidence in SARS-CoV-2 infection [22]. Our results, together with these observations, highlight the fact that control measures during a pandemic have differential effectiveness in different age groups.

An important strength of our manuscript was the use of limited data obtained mostly from detected cases to examine the role of different population groups in propagating the spread of infection. However, our study is not without limitations. Our findings could be affected by age-differential changes in case ascertainment, over time or across regions. However, we restricted the analysis to hospitalized cases rather than all confirmed COVID-19 cases in the community because changes in healthcare seeking behavior (e.g., for ambulatory visits), and changes in testing in the outpatient setting might affect the relation between the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the rates of detected COVID-19 cases. However, such temporal changes are less likely for hospitalized cases, with uniform guidelines for testing hospitalized cases applied in Mexico, and low likelihood of mild cases resulting in hospitalization during certain time periods. Second, the perception of the potential severity of the disease may have changed over time and clinicians, even with an existing case definition, may have preferentially tested certain age groups. We explored whether testing for hospitalized patients in all age groups changed over time and did not find evidence for this (Supplemental Figure). Third, we used date of symptom onset to temporally classify cases from an administrative database. Thus the possibility of error in registration is present. However, this error is probably random and unlikely to affect results. Alternatively, there might be differences across age groups in their recall of the date of onset, yet this seems unlikely. Fourth, it is important to notice that the database from the Ministry of Health it is not updated over time. In other words, we do not know if a case that was originally registered as an ambulatory case was later hospitalized.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Supplemental Figure

Trends in the distribution of SARS-CoV-2 tests (RT-PCR) by age group among hospitalized individuals.

In conclusion, our paper provides evidence for an increased relative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among individuals aged 15-24 years when the lockdown interventions were lifted. Our results suggest that the age structure was an important factor in the effect of lockdown interventions. Multigenerational household arrangements are common in Mexico. Therefore, efforts aimed at spreading risk awareness in adolescents and young adults and limiting social interactions for members of certain age groups in certain venues may be considered to stem the increase of COVID-19 incidence in the community in Mexico.