Self-reported changes in energy balance behaviors during COVID-19 related home confinement: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, has caused significant disruption in the everyday life of people all over the world. In late March 2020, restaurants and shops closed and transitioned to delivery services, and workplaces transitioned to home. In addition, shelter-in-place orders to prevent the spread of the virus were delivered in many cities and states. As a result, people were suddenly confronted with the prospect of sheltering at home for an extended period. One area of great concern with this sudden rise in unstructured time with extended home confinement is its long-term effect on weight management in adults. These concerns are reflected in numerous social media posts referencing “Quarantine 15”, “gaining the COVID-19”, or “fattening the curve”, in the last 3 months. While the fear of excessive weight gain in the general public is palpable, this concern is anecdotal mainly due to the lack of objective scientific evidence. We know from prior literature that small changes in body weight in relatively short periods can become permanent and lead to substantial weight gain over time[1]. Thus, it is imperative to understand the challenges with shelter-in-place practices as they relate to weight management.

Numerous possible challenges can affect energy intake and energy expenditure during this home isolation period, the two components of energy balance[2]. Recent market analyses indicate that people stocked up on energy-dense ultra-processed foods and alcohol, and showed greater interest in cooking/baking high-calorie food[3, 4], possible predecessors to shifting food intake trends. Although these trends provide some evidence of a shift in eating and food purchase behavior, systematic scientific evidence is unavailable to reach any conclusions. Moreover, we do not know whether there is a similar shift for the consumption of healthy foods. Just as shelter-in-place recommendations may shift energy intake behavior, they also likely affect energy expenditure. With people staying indoors (in some cities and states), closures of many local parks and recreation areas, and cancellations of gym and organized sport activities, we suspect a decline in both structured and unstructured activity, and thus reduced energy expenditure. Sedentary activities and screen time are expected to expand; available data already indicates an upward trend in the use of television, internet-connected devices, and applications/web on smart devices[3]. This shift in leisure screen time is possibly displacing physical activity (PA) and contributing to a more sedentary lifestyle[5]. Increased screen time also involves increased exposure to high-frequency blue light and may influence sleep time and sleep quality in adults[6].

To date, no study has systematically examined the health and lifestyle changes as a consequence of COVID-19 related extended home confinement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test whether shelter-in-place guidelines—which are associated with alterations to daily routines—may result in changes in behaviors related to both energy intake and energy expenditure. We hypothesized that during shelter-at-home guidelines in place, we would observe an increase in purchase and intake of ultra-processed foods, snacks, and convenience food, an increase in screen time, and a decline in healthy food intake, PA, and sleep time.

METHODS

RESULTS

A total of 1,779 participants initially completed the questionnaire. One hundred and seventy participants were removed from data analysis due to poor data quality, for a final study sample of n=1,609 (Figure 1). Subject characteristics and comparison of health-related measures between men and women can be found in Table 1. Approximately 57% of the study sample were women and 43% were men. There were no differences between men and women for average age, hours of sleep, or, BMI. Men did report high Kcal METs and moderate METs. Conversely, women reported poor sleep quality and had higher total weekly METs and Vigorous METs compared to men.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Flow chart of study participants based on the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines

DISCUSSION

Small changes in body weight in relatively short periods may lead to substantial weight gain over time[1, 15]. Notably, prior research suggests that short bouts of weight fluctuation, such as during the winter holiday period (November to January), may contribute to half of annual weight gain[16-18]. This rapid weight gain is likely to remain, especially in the high-risk populations of women and individuals with overweight and obesity[17, 19, 20]. Considering the possibility that extended home confinement due to COVID-19 may have a similar effect on body weight, in this study, we aimed to report alterations in behaviors that may impact energy intake and energy expenditure in U.S. adults. We observed an increase in the intake of both healthy and energy-dense unhealthy foods and snacks during the home confinement. Participants also reported increases in sedentary activities and decreases in PA, alcohol intake, and consumption of takeout meals during this time. We also report a difference across sex on some of these behavioral changes, with data generally suggesting greater energy intake and less energy expenditure in women than men. Overall, these acute changes in behaviors underscore the significance of a sudden increase in unstructured time at home on potential weight gain.

Concerning eating behavior, as hypothesized, participants increased the consumption of SSBs and pre-packaged processed and ultra-processed foods. Such foods tend to be high in sugar, saturated fat, and sodium content compared to less processed foods and may compose 60-65% of calories of all packaged foods purchased in the U.S.[21]. In addition to having less favorable nutrient content, ultra-processed foods are highly palatable and therefore may produce change in neurocircuitry, causing addictive-like eating behaviors and overconsumption[22, 23]. Not surprisingly, recent research provides fairly consistent support for the association of ultra-processed food intake and SSB intake with excessive weight gain[24, 25]. These processed and ultra-processed foods also have the potential to promote weight gain by altering eating patterns and promoting shifts towards snacking[26]. Our data support this by showing that snacking of calorie-dense savory foods (e.g., chips, popcorn, pretzels, crackers), chocolate, dessert (e.g., cake, cookies, ice-creams, etc.), and yogurt/cheese increased. We speculate that the high energy-density of these snacks along with a possibility that these snacks are typically consumed while engaged in another activity (e.g. while watching TV) may have led to overconsumption. To sum, in line with a recent consumer survey, our participants bought more packaged foods and ate more snacks than usual[27].

The shift towards unhealthy eating was also reflected in the food purchasing behavior where we show that availability and shelf-life of the food, rather than the health, influenced the purchase decisions. While we did not collect the information directly, we speculate that households stocked up on shelf-stable and highly desirable ultra-processed calorie dense foods. Though stocking up on shelf-stable food items is a preparedness necessity, helps minimize trips outside of the home, and is perceived safer than unpackaged foods, we anticipate these purchasing patterns may have contributed to increased energy-dense food in our population group.

In contrast to our hypothesis, our participants reported increasing their intake of fruits and vegetables. Although we did not assess cooking behaviors directly, these findings suggest that spending more time at home may have provided participants the opportunity to cook food at home and utilize more fruits and vegetables in their meals[28]. This speculation is supported by a recent google trends analysis which shows that search for cooking terms increased during the home confinement period, as compared to before pandemic[4]. Notably, participants also reported decreases in the consumption of takeout foods, further suggesting they were likely cooking more. Since takeout foods are often high in calories, total fat, and sodium[29], a decline in the purchase of takeout meals may also have influenced this pattern. Overall, we found that while people were eating more unhealthy foods possibly due to stocking up on shelf-stable foods that are typically highly processed, they also had a high intake of healthy foods possibly due to cooking more meals at home and consuming fewer takeout foods.

Although people reported prioritizing nutrition in their food purchase behaviors, and they did report consuming more fruits and vegetables, they also reported greater intake of energy-dense ultra-processed foods. Their rank-ordering of nutrition as highly important may have reflected a desire for self-presentation or lack of familiarity with the question-type.

Sedentary activities such as sitting, watching television, and other leisurely screen activities all increased significantly with shelter-in-place recommendations. A recent marketing survey reported a similar trend with the use of e-screens in U.S. adults[3]. Evidence regarding the association between sedentary behavior and obesity is weak and inconclusive[30], but it does lead to a decline in energy expenditure. In conjunction with the increased screen time, our participants reported spending less time on vigorous, moderate, and low intensity (walking) exercises. This supports the data from a recent working paper [31], as well as the data released by Fitbit (Fitbit, Inc., 2020) in April 2020, which shows that step count decreased by 16-23% in the younger population. Adults living in dense urban locations are at an even greater disadvantage due to lack of access to outdoor spaces where they can engage in physical activity while maintaining safe social distancing. These variables may further exacerbate the disparity between who can and cannot remain physically active outdoors. Overall, there seemed to be a decline in energy expenditure with a change in PA related behaviors.

Prior studies suggest that women are at higher risk for weight gain than men due to differences in body composition, regulation of food intake, and low total and activity-related energy expenditure[32, 33]. Indeed, women in our dataset reported being more likely to indulge in the consumption of ultra-processed foods, SSBs, energy-dense snacks, as well as fruits and vegetables, than men. Additionally, women were more likely than men to report increases (vs. decreases) in sedentary activities and indulging in screen time. Interestingly, women also reported to have poor sleep quality. Poor sleep quality[34] and sleep deprivation[35] have been associated with abnormal body weight and body fat increases in women in previous literature. Though women increased their sleep time, the possible exposure to high frequency blue screen may have caused disruptions in sleep quality[6], which ultimately may have an effect on body weight. Women also decreased their PA, but not as significantly as men. Overall, as expected, women showed a greater shift towards obesogenic behaviors in our population group. These behaviors also put women at higher risk of weight gain during this pandemic than men.

This study should be considered in light of some limitations. Our sample, though relatively large, was a convenience sample. Moreover, degree of shelter-in-place guidelines and the number of COVID-19 cases in participants area of residence likely differed, creating differences in flexibility with stepping outside the house. Additionally, due to the nature of data collected, our results may be subject to self-reporting bias and/or recall bias. The time frame of data collection may have influenced our results as well. As such, at the time of data collection in early May (April 24^th - May 4^th), although most states had implemented shelter-in-place guidelines, a few states were considering lifting the restriction after May 1^st. Additionally, this study was cross-sectional, so although associations can be assessed as a result of the pandemic, we cannot establish cause and effect. Finally, we did not use a validated tool for eating behavior measures, or a validated tool for assessing behavior changes, so care should be taken to integrate these findings with the broader literature.

In conclusion, the current findings strongly support the need to implement and support measures that promote strategies to maintain body weight by limiting energy-dense but nutrient poor foods, maintaining healthy eating patterns, performing short bouts of PA, scheduling structured exercises that can be done at home, using tracking applications, and using well-established strategies such as daily self-weighing. Using virtual strategies such as internet-based exercise routines, support groups, virtual activity challenges may be useful to maintain energy expenditure in this the time of extended home confinement. Researchers should also consider collecting body weight data at multiple time points to longitudinally assess the dynamic relationship between behaviors and body weight change. Finally, researchers and public health officials should strategize for ways to reverse any COVID-19-related weight gain or loss of physical fitness that may occur for long-term health.