Abstarct
Background The COVID-19 serological tests for IgG and IgM have been developed with several methodologies: Immunoenzymatic Assay (ELISA), Chemiluminescence, Electro Chemiluminescence, Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassays and Immunochromatography. None of these tests should be used for the diagnosis or population screening of the disease, considering that the antibodies appear only on the 8th – 14th day of the disease onset. The present study evaluates a sample of immunofluorescent and immunochromatographic rapid tests to show their agreement in relation to Chemiluminescence.
Methods A diagnostic test evaluation assay was performed to establish the performance of five “rapid” tests (4 immunochromatographic and 1 immunofluorescent tests) for IgG and IgM serology for SARS-CoV-2 using a panel of 30 serum samples from patients received in the laboratory analysis routine. For the evaluation of clinical performance, the qualitative results of the “rapid” tests were compared against those obtained by chemiluminescence, dichotomized as positives (≥ 10 AU / mL) or negative (<10 UA / mL).
Findings The best agreement is seen in the immunofluorescent assay, for the IgG contrast, with a particularly good kappa index (0.85), without positive disagreements and a negative disagreement of about 15%. In the immunochromatographic methods Kappa index was 0.61 at best, with disagreements in negative findings of ≈35% and in positive cases of up to ≈70%.
The IgM concordance behavior, on the other hand, reflects a weak to moderate Kappa concordance value (Kappa 0.2 to 0.6), with negative disagreements reaching up to 55% and positives of up to 84%, without any evaluated test reaching Kappa performance equal to or greater than 0.8.
Interpretation Serological studies should be used in the clinical and epidemiological context and of other diagnostic tests. Given the high demand and supply in the market of “rapid serological tests”, its evaluation against panels of serologically positive or negative samples established by Chemiluminescence or Electro chemiluminescence is essential to authorize its extensive use in populations
Funding None
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study do not use information from patients only use information obtained of samples in clinical routine evaluation and the not require any local approbation for their execution, this criteria was extend by the Research Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the Central University of Ecuador
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Saenz-Flor,K], upon reasonable request.
