Abstract
Objective Research looking simultaneously at the effects of anesthesia and oral cleft types on academic achievement is scarce. Available results are contradictory: some studies suggest that anesthesia exposure is responsible for underachievement, and others that responsibility falls instead on the type of orofacial cleft. This study investigates the potential compound effects of exposure to anesthesia and orofacial cleft types on the risk of academic underachievement.
Design Centre Labio Palatin Albert Coninck, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, nationwide register-based study.
Setting Birth cohort 1995-2007.
Patients Twenty-nine children with isolated orofacial clefts exposed to anesthesia.
Interventions Average duration of exposure to anesthesia before the Certificat d Etudes de Base (CEB) exam was 382 minutes.
Main Outcome Measure(s) Scores obtained by patients at the CEB exam were compared with the scores of the 6th grade Belgian general population who passed the same exam controlling for gender, school year, year they passed the exam, medical illnesses, duration of exposure to anesthesia in minutes and socioeconomic confounders.
Results Doubling the time of anesthesia exposure produces a 17 percentage point increase in the probability that patients will underachieve. Cleft lip reduces while cleft right-left increases the duration of anesthesia exposure relative to cleft lip palate. Results do not change when anesthesia exposure only up to 4 years and socioeconomic factors are considered.
Conclusions Both exposure to anesthesia and different types of orofacial cleft may result in underachievement at the CEB exam.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study has not received any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
An approval by the ethics committee (Comite d Ethique hospital-facultaire) of the Catholic University of Louvain was given prior to the study. (ID: B403201525304).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.