Abstract
A goal of rehabilitation after stroke is to promote pre-stroke levels of arm use for everyday, frequently bimanual, functional activities. We reasoned that, after a stroke, the choice to use one or both hands for bimanual tasks might depend not only on residual motor capacity but also the specialized demands imposed by the task on the paretic hand. To capture spontaneous, task-specific choices, we covertly observed 50 pre-stroke right-handed chronic stroke survivors (25 left hemisphere damage, LHD) and recorded their hand use strategies for two pairs of bimanual tasks with distinct demands: one with greater precision requirements (photo-album tasks), and another with greater stabilization requirements (letter-envelope tasks). The primary outcome was the choice to use one or both hands. Logistic regression was used to test the hypothesis that the probability of choosing a bimanual strategy would be greater in those with less severe motor impairment and those with LHD. When collapsed across the four subtasks, we found support for this hypothesis. However, notably, the influence of these factors on bimanual choice varied based on task demands. For the photo-album task, the probability of a bimanual strategy was greater for those with LHD compared to RHD, regardless of the degree of motor impairment. For the letter-envelope task, we found a significant interaction between impairment and side of lesion in determining the likelihood of choosing both hands. Therefore, the manner in which side of lesion moderates the effect of impairment on hand use depends on the task.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research study is supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers: F31HD098796 to RV and R01HD065438 to NS and CW.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data table and code for analysis are available on the first author’s OSF repository.
