Comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging features, treatment strategies, and outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Catherine R. Jutzeler, Lucie Bourguignon, Caroline V. Weis, Bobo Tong, Cyrus Wong, Bastian Rieck, Hans Pargger, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter, Adrin Egli, Karsten Borgwardt, Matthias Walter
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.20103804

Abstract

Introduction Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has triggered a world-wide pandemic with an enormous medical, societal, and economic toll. Thus, our aim was to gather all available information regarding comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, outcomes, laboratory findings, imaging features, and treatments in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods EMBASE, PubMed/ Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published in any language between December 1st, 2019 and March 28th. Original studies were included if the exposure of interest was an infection with SARS-CoV-2 or confirmed COVID-19. The primary outcome was the risk ratio of comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, imaging features, treatments, outcomes, and complications associated with COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. We performed random-effects pairwise meta-analyses for proportions and relative risks, I2, Tau2, and Cochrane Q, sensitivity analyses, and assessed publication bias.

Results 148 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and meta-analysis with 12’149 patients (5’739 female) and a median age was 47.0 [35.0–64.6]. 617 patients died from COVID-19 and its complication, while 297 patients were reported as asymptomatic. Older age (SMD: 1.25 [0.78-1.72]; p < 0.001), being male (RR = 1.32 [1.13–1.54], p = 0.005) and pre-existing comorbidity (RR = 1.69 [1.48–1.94]; p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of in-hospital mortality. The heterogeneity between studies varied substantially (I2; range: 1.5–98.2%). Publication bias was only found in eight studies (Egger’s test: p < 0.05).

Conclusions Our meta-analyses revealed important risk factors that are associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) initially emerged in Wuhan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China and has been identified as the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It’s pandemic spread presents a substantial medical challenge with an enormous societal and economic toll1,2. Similar to influenza and SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2 is considered a “crowd disease” that spreads most easily when individuals are packed together at high densities. Phylogenetic data implicate a zoonotic origin3 and the rapid spread suggests ongoing person-to-person transmission4. Additional factors contributing to the rapid spread constitute the duration of the incubation period5 and infectiousness peaking on or before symptom onset6 contribute to the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2. Another factor contributing to the rapid spread and alarmingly high number of infected people is the SARS-CoV-2 nature of initial dormancy of symptoms. The most common symptoms associated with COVID-19 include a sudden onset of fever, coughing, and dyspnea2,7,8. Complications comprise acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, kidney failure, bacterial superinfections, coagulation abnormalities and thromboembolic events, sepsis, and even death9,10. So far, only a few demographic and clinical factors, such as older age, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, have been linked with poor outcome and increased risk of mortality11,12. This knowledge gap extends to the risk of infections, disease progression, and outcome in vulnerable patient populations, including newborns, children, pregnant, and elderly patients. A better understanding of the risks for these vulnerable patient populations is critical in order to optimize their protection and tailor prevention and treatment strategies. Thus, the aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather available information in the literature and determine the most prevalent comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, imaging features, laboratory parameters, treatments, outcomes, and complications arising in patients with COVID-19. We stratified our systematic reviews and meta-analysis by different cohorts, namely pediatric/neonatal and adult COVID-19 patients including pregnant women. Furthermore, we aimed to assess current evidence for the associations between risk factors and in-hospital mortality. Based on previous reports, we addressed the hypothesis that male sex, older age, as well as pre-existing hypertension and diabetes mellitus are risk factors of morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19.

2. Methods

Our systematic review and meta-analysis adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement13 and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist14.

2.1. Search strategy and selection criteria

Four bibliographic databases were systematically searched: EMBASE, PubMed/ Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Our search was not restricted by language. We searched for studies published from December 1st, 2019 to March 28th, 2020, with search terms related to COVID-19 (“COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “coronavirus disease 2019”, “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2”, “2019 novel coronavirus”, “2019-nCoV”, “coronavirus”, and “corona virus”). The full search strategy is provided in Appendix 1. Manual searching was also performed, reviewing reference lists of relevant studies and comprehensive review articles. Records were managed by EndNote X 8.0 software to exclude duplicates.

2.2. Selection of studies

Two investigators (CRJ and MW) independently screened the titles and abstracts to determine whether studies should be included. Eligibility criteria were also applied to the full-text articles during the final selection. In case multiple articles reported on a single study, the article that provided the most data was selected for further synthesis. We quantified the inter-rater agreement for study selection using Cohen’s κ coefficient15. Articles written in Chinese were reviewed by our two native speaking authors (BT and CW) and if the inclusion criteria were met, these authors also extracted the specified data. All disagreements were discussed and resolved at a consensus meeting.

2.3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All full-text, peer-reviewed articles that described case-control, cohort studies, or case studies investigating the epidemiological and clinical features, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, imaging features, and/or treatment of patients that were diagnosed with COVID-19. We excluded duplicate publications, non-peer reviewed articles (e.g., preprints), reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts or conference proceedings, editorials, commentaries, letters with insufficient data, studies on non-human species, or out-of-scope studies (e.g., comparison with other infections, case-fatality reports). In case multiple studies published data from the same cohort, we included the article representing the most inclusive information on the population to avoid overlap. Lastly, studies that did not report demographics (i.e., age and sex) were also excluded. Figure 1 outlines our search strategy and application of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Flow-chart of the search strategy.

A total of 148 studies were eligible for the literature review and the first part of the meta-analysis (i.e., prevalence). Nine-teen studies were included in the second part of the meta-analysis (i.e., severity and mortality).

2.4. Data extraction and synthesis

Data extraction tables were created with the following information: 1) publication information (i.e., author, date, language of article, country where the study was performed, study design [case study, case series, or cohort study]16, study population [pediatric/neonatal and adult COVID-19 patients including pregnant women); 2) demographics (i.e., age, sex); 3) clinical signs and symptoms (e.g., cough, fatigue, fever, sputum); 3) comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases); 4) therapies administered to treat COVID-19 (e.g., antibiotics, antivirals, invasive mechanical ventilation); 5) clinical outcomes (e.g., death, survival, recovery); and 6) complications associated with COVID-19 (e.g., sepsis and shock, ARDS). In case studies provided data for multiple patient groups(e.g., pediatric and adult patient), we extracted this information separately for each group. A full list of extracted variables is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1 Included studies of adults with COVID-19

2.5. Statistical analysis

For the studies reporting mean and standard deviation (SD) for extracted variables, we computed the median and interquartile ranges (IQR) assuming a normal distribution (i.e., using the formula: IQR ∼ SD*1.35). To test if there is a bias by including the studies for which we computed the median and IQR (i.e., quartiles, Q1 and Q3), we performed a sensitivity analyses in which we calculated the median and IQR under the assumption of right-skewed and left-skewed distribution (see Appendix 2). We compared the results of the different distributions to test the robustness of our findings. Descriptive statistics (median, IQR, n, and %) were used to characterize the studies and patients included as well as the laboratory parameters. Weighted by study sample size, the pooled median and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for continuous variables. Normality approximation of the binomial was used to construct an approximate confidence interval (R package metamedian17). Welch’s two-sample t-test was employed to test if there are significant differences in the proportion of male and female patients across studies.

Our meta-analysis was structured in two parts. In the first part, we performed meta-analyses of all 148 studies to define the prevalence of comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, imaging features, treatments, outcomes, and complications associated with COVID-19. Using the metaprop function of the R package metafor18, we calculated the overall prevalence from studies reporting a single prevalence. Our meta-analysis was stratified by patient group (pediatric/neonatal [≤17 years of age], pregnant, and adult COVID-19 patients). Heterogeneity between studies was assessed visually by Forest plots, and analytically by I², tau T2, and Cochrane Q. Briefly put, I2 describes the percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance19: 0% indicates no heterogeneity, whereas 25%, 50%, and 75% indicate low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively. CIs for I² were calculated using the iterative non-central chi-squared distribution method of Hedges and Piggott20. Tau (T2) represents the absolute value of the true variance (heterogeneity) and is the estimated SD of underlying true effects across studies. Cochran’s Q is the weighted sum of squared differences between individual study effects and the pooled effect across studies, with the weights being those used in the pooling method (i.e., sample size)21. The second part comprised meta-analyses to calculate the relative risk (RR) of certain comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, imaging features, laboratory parameters, complications, and outcomes in patients with severe vs. those with non-severe disease condition (12 studies) as well as deceased vs. survivors (7 studies). The categorization into severe and non-severe COVID-19 disease was consistent with the groups reported by the reviewed studies (Supplementary Table 2). Owing to our judgment that considerable clinical and statistical heterogeneity exists among the studies (statistical heterogeneity was confirmed by the computed I2, T2, and Cochrane Q), we calculated pooled RRs with 95% CIs using a random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting (metabin function from R package meta). For continuous outcome data (e.g., age, laboratory parameters, and time from symptoms onset to hospital admission), we estimated the standardized mean difference (SMD) by means of a random-effect models with inverse variance weighting for pooling (metacont function from R package meta). To calculate the SMD, we converted medians, Q1s, and Q3s into means and standard deviations. The SMD, 95% CIs, and p values were reported. We produced Forest plots to visualize the results from the random-effect models (R function: forest). Publication bias was assessed visually by funnel plots (R function: funnel) and analytically by the Egger test (R function: regtest). An Egger test p<0·05 indicates a significant publication bias. All statistical analyses were performed in R (version 3.6.3) for MacOS X (Mojave, 10.14.4) with the packages meta (version 4.11–0) and dmetar (version 0.0.90)18. The code used for the analysis and to create figures and tables is provided in our GitHub repository (https://github.com/jutzca/Corona-Virus-Meta-Analysis-2020).

2.6. Role of funding source

The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

3. Results

Study selection and study characteristics

Our systematic literature search yielded 5’049 articles (including articles identified by manual searching). Upon removal of duplicates and exclusion of studies on the basis of their abstracts or following screening their full text, 148 met the inclusion criteria and were considered for the review and meta-analysis (Figure 1)4,8,28,118–127,29,128–137,30,138–147,31,148–157,32,158–165,33–37,9,38–47,11,48–57,22,58–67,23,68–77,24,78–87,25,88–97,26,98–107,27,108–117. The inter-rater agreement for study selection was very high (κ = 0·94 [95% CI: 0.91 –0.96], 97.0% agreement [11/ 362 studies with disagreement]). Detailed information on the included studies are provided in Tables 1–3. Included studies were conducted in 15 countries between December 1st, 2019 and March 28th, 2020 (Supplementary Table 3) and enrolled between 1 and 1’099 patients(median 12.5 [1.00 – 56.75]). The majority of the articles were written in English (123 studies, 83.1%) and the remainder in Chinese (25 studies, 16.9%). We classified studies according to their design16: cohort study (76 studies, 51.4%), case study/ report (41 studies, 27.7%), and case series (31 studies, 20.9%). While all studies reported information on demographics (148, 100%), the number of studies reporting information on comorbidities (84 studies, 56.8%), clinical sign and symptoms (130 studies, 87.8%), laboratory parameters (113 studies, 76.4%), imaging features (118 studies, 79.7%), treatments (91,61.5%), outcomes (118 studies, 79.3%), and complications (59 studies, 39.9%) varied markedly.

View this table:
Table 2 Included studies of pregnant women with COVID-19
View this table:
Table 3 Included studies of pregnant women with COVID-19

In terms of study population, 114 studies included only adult participants, 6 only pregnant women, 22 only children and neonates, and 6 included mixed cohorts. Of the total 12’149 patients included, 6’410 (52.8%) were male and 5’739 female (47.2%, Figure 2A and 2B). The median age of adult (11’058 patients, 91.0%), pregnant (35 patients, 0.3%), and pediatric (1’056 patients, 8.7%; including neonates) patients was 47.0 years [35.0–65.3] (Figure 3A), 30.0 [26.0–33.0] Figure 3B, and 10.0 [2.0–13.0] (Figure 3C), respectively. Approximately 7.8% (297/ 3’822 patients) were reported to be asymptomatic and 7.7% (617/ 8’047) died during hospitalization due to complications related to the infection with SARS-CoV-2. With the exception of one 10-month old child, all deaths were non-pregnant adult COVID-19 patients.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Proportion of female and male patients in adult (A) and pediatric/neonatal cohort (B).

All case studies/ reports were pooled together for visualization (CS_adult, and CS_children [pediatric/neonatal]). The key to the study identifier can be found in Tables 1 (adults) and Table 3 (children).

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Age of adult (A), pregnant (B), and pediatric/neonatal (C) COVID-19 patients included in eligible studies.

Median age and interquartile ranges (IQR) are represented by the midpoints and error bars, respectively. The studies have been sorted by patients’ median age in years. The size of the midpoint (circle, square, triangle) indicates the study sample size. The red line indicates the pooled median age of the respective cohort. All adult case studies/ reports (CS_adult) were pooled for the visualization reasons. The key to the study identifier can be found in Table 1 (adults), Table 2 (pregnant women), and Table 3 (children).

Adult patients

Higher proportions of male than female patients were reported to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (t = 2.678, df = 202, p-value = 0.008; Figure 2A) across all studies. Comorbidities were present in ∼31% of the adult patients (2’329/ 7’608), with hypertension being the most prevalent one (1’352/ 6’460 patients, 20.93%), followed by heart failure (37/ 354 patients, 10.5%), diabetes mellitus (678/ 6’535 patients, 10.4%), and coronary heart disease (194/ 2’388 patients, 8.5%) (Figure 4A, Table 4, Supplementary Figure 1). The most frequent clinical signs and symptoms were fever (6’955/ 8’859 patients, 78.5%), cough (4’778/ 8’885 patients, 53.8%), and fatigue (1’996/ 7’980 patients, 25.0%) (Figure 4B, Table 4). A little over five percent of the adult COVID-19 patients were asymptomatic (148/ 2’749 patients, 5.4%). Over 6’969 patients (89.6%) had abnormal CT imaging features. The most common patterns of CT abnormalities were indicating pneumonia (unilateral or bilateral; 6’620/ 7’917 patients, 83.6%), including air bronchogram (264/ 523 patients, 50.5%), and ground-glass opacity (GGO) with consolidation (153/ 323 patients, 47.4%) and without (2’446/ 5’591 patients, 43.8%) (Table 4, Supplementary Figure 2). In terms of laboratory parameters, inflammatory markers, such as interleukin 6 (22 pg/mL [4.68–51.8]), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (32.5 mm/h [17.3–53.8]) were elevated across the adult population. Moreover, markers of coagulation, namely d-dimer (0.5 µg/mL [0.3–1.08]), fibrinogen (4.5 g/L [3.66–5.1]), and cell damage were also elevated (i.e., lactate dehydrogenase, U/L; 213 [173–268]). An overview of all laboratory parameters is provided in Supplementary Table 4. As shown in Figure 4D, the most common treatments were antivirals (4’475/6’068, patients, 73.8%), oxygen therapy (1’300/ 1’872 patients, 69.4%), and antibiotics (2’518/ 4’825 patients, 52.2%). Detailed information on all treatments is provided in in Table 4. Eight percent (616/7’727 patients) of the adults died during the hospitalization due to complications related to COVID-19. Amongst the survivors (7’111/ 7’727 patients, 92.0%), a total of 3’025 (68.7%) remained hospitalized, 1’751 (32.4%) were discharged, and 1’012 (27.1%) reportedly recovered (Figure 4C, Table 4). Important to note, for some patients it was stated that they both, recovered and were discharged (i.e., one patient can fall in multiple categories). The median duration between symptoms onset and hospitalization was 8 days [7 – 9.5]. A total of 195 (6.8%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The most frequently reported complications associated with COVID-19 were pneumonia (1’032/ 1’489 patients, 69.2%), respiratory failure (141/ 413 patients, 34.1%), acute cardiac injury (242/ 1’250 patients, 19.4%), and ARDS (759/ 5’122 patients, 14.8%), (Figure 4D, Table 4).

View this table:
Table 4: Summary for random effects model for prevalence of comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, imaging features, treatments, outcome and complications in adult CoVID-19 patients.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Comorbidities (A), Clinical signs and symptoms (B), outcomes (C), and treatments administered (D) to adult COVID-19 patients.

The colors indicated the proportion of patients (%, 0 = yellow, 100 = dark purple). Note: Missing values are colored in white.

Pregnant woman

Studies investigating the effect of COVID-19 in pregnant women reported that only five pregnant women had any history of comorbidities. Hypothyroidism, allergies, or influenza were reported each for one pregnant woman (Supplementary Table 5). Fever (25/ 35 patients, 71.4%), cough (12/29 patients, 41.4%), and myalgia (3/ 9 patients, 33.3%) were the three most common symptoms observed in pregnant women that were infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Supplementary Figure 3, Supplementary Table 5). Abnormal CT features were evident in 88.6% (31/ 35 patients) of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19. Pneumonia (unilateral or bilateral, 31/ 35 patients, 88.6%), GGO (29/ 34 patients, 85.3%), and consolidation (8/ 16 patients, 50.0%) were among the most common patterns of CT abnormalities (Supplementary Figure 4, Supplementary Table 5). Inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (19.25 mg/L [12.35–25.7]), procalcitonin (0.187 ng/mL), and neutrophil count (9.14 × 109/L) were elevated in this patient population. Along this line, lactate dehydrogenase concentrations were increased (544 U/L) reflecting cellular damage. An overview of all laboratory parameters is provided in Supplementary Table 4. Moreover, antibiotics (14/ 14 patients, 100.0%), antivirals (11/ 14 patients, 78.6%) and oxygen therapy (high flow nasal cannula; 3/ 12 patients, 25.0%) were used to treat pregnant COVID-19 patients (Supplementary Table 5). None of the pregnant COVID-19 patients died. Lastly, one patient was admitted to the ICU (Supplementary Table 5).

Pediatric and Neonatal Patients

Similar to the adult cohort, the proportion between female and male patients were comparable in the pediatric/neonatal cohort (t = 1.169, df = 26, p-value = 0.253; Figure 2B). Fourteen percent of the children and neonates were asymptomatic (149/ 1’054). With the exception of two children, no comorbidities were reported for any of the pediatric or neonatal patients (Supplementary Table 6). Similar to the adult and pregnant COVID-19 patients, children and neonates frequently presented with fever (170/ 320 patients, 53.1%), cough (149/ 311 patients, 47.9%), and sputum (14/ 51 patients, 27.5%) (Supplementary Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 6). Sixty-five percent of the pediatric and neonatal patients presented with CT abnormalities, including pneumonia (194/ 298 patients), GGO (108/ 278 patients, 38.9%), and local patchy shadowing (52/ 223 patients, 23.3%) (Supplementary Figure 7, Supplementary Table 6). An overview of all laboratory parameters is provided in Supplementary Table 7. As the reference values vary considerably within the pediatric/neonatal patient population, the results of the laboratory parameters have to be interpreted with caution. In terms of treatment, children and neonates received antibiotics (31/ 43 patients, 72.1%), oxygen therapy through high flow nasal cannula (5/ 9 patients, 55.6%), and alpha interferon aerosol inhalation therapy (31/52, 59.6%) to treat COVID-19 and its complications (Supplementary Figure 8, Supplementary Table 6). With the exception of a 10-month-old child that died four weeks after admission of multi-organ failure, all children survived. Less than 30% remained hospitalized (90/ 293 patients), 74.5% were discharged (216/ 290 patients) and 87.4% reportedly recovered (236/ 270 patients) (Supplementary Figure 9, Supplementary Table 6). The median duration between symptoms onset and hospitalization was 6 days [4.0–8.5]. Fifteen percent (6/ 39 patients) had to be admitted to the ICU. Complications associated with COVID-19 comprised pneumonia (16/ 26 patients, 61.5%), secondary bacterial infection (12/ 21 patients, 57.1%), and respiratory failure (10/ 33 patients, 30.3%) (Supplementary Table 6).

Non-severe vs. Severe

Twelve studies (2’596 patients) provided separate data for patients with a severe (500 patients, 19.3%) and non-severe disease status (2’096, 80.7%). No differences regarding sex were found between severe (t = 0.604, df = 16.645, p-value = 0.554; male: 278 patients [55.6%] and female: 210 patients [42.0%]; unknown sex: 12 patients [2.4%]) and non-severe disease status group (t = 0.217, df = 16.393, p-value = 0.831; male: 1’059 patients [50.5%] and female: 925 patients [49.5%]) (Supplementary Figure 10). In terms of age, patients with non-severe COVID-19 were significantly younger (median age in years = 45.0 [34.0–57.0]) than those with a severe disease progression (61.4 [44.5–75.5], Figure 5). Our meta-analysis revealed that older age (SMD: 0.68 [0.40–0.97]; p < 0.001), being male (RR = 1.11 [1.01–1.22]; p = 0.039), and preexisting comorbidities (RR = 2.11 [1.02–4.35], p = 0.046) were associated with a higher risk of increased disease severity. Specifically, hypertension (RR = 2.15 [1.64–2.81], p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (RR = 2.56 [1.50–4.39], p = 0.005), any heart condition (RR = 4.09 [2.45–6.84], p < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, RR = 5.10 [3.08–8.45], p < 0.001) (Figure 6, Table 5) were associated with worse outcome (i.e., severe disease). To test if the increased risk of heart conditions is attributable to the study that has classified their patients into severe and non-severe based on the presence or absence of cardiac injuries, we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding these studies44. The risk of any heart condition remained significantly elevated in the severe disease patient cohort (RR = 3.87 [1.85 – 8.11], p = 0.005). Numerous laboratory parameters were significantly different between the non-severe and severe patient cohorts. Patients with severe disease status presented with decreased levels of albumin (SMD = 1.60 [−2.97 – (−0.24)]; p = 0.022), hemoglobin (SMD = –0.23 [−0.41-(−0.06)]; p = 0.001), and thrombocytes (SMD = –0.57 [−0.68-(−0.45)]; p < 0.001) in comparison to patients with non-severe disease status. Additionally, C-reactive protein (SMD = 1.47 [0.88–2.07]; p < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase (SMD = 1.71 [1.08–2.34]; p < 0.001), and aspartate transaminase levels (SMD = 0.85 [0.61–1.09]; p < 0.001) were elevated in patients with severe disease status. In terms of complications, patients with severe COVID-19 disease were at an elevated risk of developing ARDS (RR = 10.59 [2.44–46.01], p = 0.014, Figure 6). The heterogeneity between the studies varied substantially (Table 5). Publication bias, measured by means of the Egger’s test, was only evident in three analyses. However, Egger’s test may lack the statistical power to detect bias when the number of studies is small (i.e., fewer than 10) as we only included 4–8 studies.

View this table:
Table 5: Results of meta-analyses for patients with severe and non-severe disease outcome as well as survivors and non-survivors.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Age of non-severe (A), severe (B), survivor (C), and non-survivor (D) COVID-19 patients included in eligible studies.

The median age and Interquartile ranges (IQR) are represented by the midpoints and error bars, respectively. The studies have been sorted by patients’ median age in years. The size of the midpoint indicates the study sample size. The red line indicates the pooled median age of the respective cohort. The key to the study identifier can be found in Table 1.

Figure 6.
Figure 6. Relative risks of comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and COPD) and complications(i.e., ARDS) in patients with a severe COVID-19 disease progression.

Funnel plots indicate the potential of publication bias. The key to the study identifier can be found in Table 1.

Survivor vs. non-survivors

Seven studies (957 patients) provided disaggregated data for COVID-19 survivors (617 patients, 64.5%) and non-survivors (340, 35.5%). No differences regarding sex were found in the survivor group (t = 0.258, df = 11.879, p-value = 0.801; male: 326 patients [52.8%] and female: 291 patients [47.2%]), but a significantly higher proportion of male patients were amongst the deceased cohort (t = 4.30, df = 12, p-value = 0.001; male: 236 patients [69.4%] and female: 104 patients [30.6%]) (Supplementary Figure 10). In terms of age, COVID-19 patients that survived were significantly younger (median age in years = 52.0 [35.0–66.0]) than non-survivors (68.0 [62.0–76.0], Figure 5). The meta-analysis yielded older age(SMD: 1.25 [0.78-1.72]; p < 0.001), being male (RR = 1.32 [1.13–1.54], p = 0.005), pre-existing comorbidities (RR = 1.69 [1.48–1.94]; p < 0.001) as potential risk factors of in-hospital mortality. Pre-existing cerebrovascular diseases (RR = 36.88 [8.50–160.04]; p = 0.009), heart conditions (RR = 3.95 [1.03–15.20], p = 0.047, Figure 7A), and hypertension (RR = 2.09 [1.65–2.64]; p = 0.001) were found to be associated with the highest risks of mortality. Clinical signs and symptoms as well as imaging features were comparable between survivors and non-survivors. In terms of treatments, non-survivors were more frequently mechanically ventilated than survivors (RR = 6.05 [1.41–26.05]; p = 0.026, Figure 7B) and more commonly received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (RR = 4.39 [1.64–11.78], p = 0.014). Non-survivors had higher risks of complications, particularly acute kidney injury (RR = 20.77 [2.43–177.44], p = 0.017; Figure 7C) and ARDS (RR = 4.24 [1.30–13.83], p = 0.026, Figure 7D). Low levels of albumin (SMD = –1.13 [−1.41 – (−0.85)]; p < 0.001) and lymphocytes (SMD = –0.92 [−1.3 – (−0.55)]; p < 0.001) as well as elevated level of interleukin 6 (SMD = 1.21 [0.93 – 1.5]; p < 0.001), leucocytes (SMD = 2.21 [0.61 – 3.64]; p = 0.06), and prolonged prothrombin time (SMD = 7.99 [4.64 – 11.34]; p < 0.01) were associated with death (Table 5). Publication bias, measured by means of the Egger’s test, was only evident in five analyses.

Figure 7.
Figure 7. Relative risks of comorbidity (i.e., any heart condition), treatment (i.e., mechanical ventilation), and complications (i.e., acute kidney injury and ARDS) in survivors and non-survivors.

Funnel plots indicate the potential of publication bias. The key to the study identifier can be found in Table 1.

4. Discussion

As of May 1st, 2020, more than 3.3 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and more than 230’000 deaths attributable to the disease, have been reported worldwide166,167. In-depth knowledge of clinical, laboratory, and imaging factors that are associated with the disease progression and outcome is critical to inform clinical decision making and pandemic preparedness initiatives. An ever-growing number of research studies have been performed, but thus far the meta-analytical evidence is sparse. To address this paucity, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 148 studies involving over 12’000 patients providing an unprecedently comprehensive overview of comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, CT imaging features, treatment, outcomes, and complications in adult, pregnant, and pediatric/neonatal COVID-19 patients. Approximately eight percent of the patients were reported to be asymptomatic, while over seven percent died from complications associated with COVID-19. Recent analysis suggests that up to 75% of the coronavirus infections caused no illness168–170. Presumably, the virus has been circulating for longer than generally believed and large swathes of the population have already been exposed. Although our fatality rate lies within previous estimates171,172, it is important to mention that only a limited number of studies reported on the outcome of COVID-19 (i.e., death, survival, recovery) and thus, caution has to be exercised when interpreting this number. Through our meta-analysis, we revealed several important risk factors that are associated with severe disease progression and mortality. Among these risk factors were two demographic factors, namely older age and being male. Well-studied consequences of ageing are the decline in the immune function (e.g., T-cell and B-cell function) and excess production of type 2 cytokines173,174. These age-dependent changes in the immune response are suspected to cause deficiency in control of viral replication and more prolonged proinflammatory responses, potentially leading to poor outcome175. Corroborative evidence stems from preclinical studies that found an age-dependent host innate responses to virus infection in non-human primates inoculated with SARS-CoV-1176. Confirming previous findings177,178, sex-specific differences in mortality and vulnerability to the disease were evident in the current study. Specifically, men were disproportionately affected by an infection with SARS-CoV-2 (i.e., proportion of men presented with COVID-19 was larger compared to women) and the in-hospital mortality amongst male patients was significantly higher compared to female patients. Emerging evidence pinpoints towards differences in the immune system140, genetic polymorphism179, life style factors including smoking180, personal hygiene habits181, pre-existing comorbidities182,183, and expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)184,185 as potential explanations for the increased vulnerability in men. This sex difference in vulnerability has also been observed for SARS and MERS186, two previously emerging coronavirus diseases. The lack of sex-disaggregated data in the reviewed studies made it impossible to further explore these potential explanations for the discrepant findings in men and women. Overall, the preexisting comorbidities, namely hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and any heart condition, were found to be linked with both, more severe diseases status and increased in-hospital mortality. Smoking, by contrast, was not associated with disease severity or mortality. However, the low number of studies reporting smoking status (13/ 148) cautions against early assumptions. Clinical signs and symptoms were comparable between patients with non-severe and severe COVID-19 as well as survivors and non-survivors. Fever, cough, and myalgia were amongst the most frequent reported symptoms across all groups. Similarly, the present study revealed no differences in the CT imaging features. The majority of the COVID-19 patients presented with pneumonia (bilateral or unilateral) and GGO. These pathological findings are a hallmark of any viral pneumonia, and thus it is not surprising that asymptomatic patients had similar distinctive features187. In terms of laboratory parameters, elevated levels of interleukin 6, leucocytes, d-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase as well as hypoalbuminemia and lymphopenia were more commonly seen in patients with severe COVID-19 illness and non-survivors. High levels of d-dimer have a reported association with 28-day mortality in patients with infections or sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit188. Systemic pro-inflammatory cytokine responses (e.g., interleukin 6 and other components) contribute to host defense against infections, such as SARS-CoV-2189–191. However, exaggerated synthesis of interleukin 6 can lead to an acute, severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) known as ‘cytokine storm’192. In addition to SIRS, hypoalbuminemia and lymphopenia were previously shown to be associated with increased odds of severe infection and infection-related death193–195. Complications were very common amongst patients with severe COVID-19 disease (over 50%) and non-survivors (more than two thirds). Acute cardiac injury, ARDS, and acute kidney injury were strongly linked to the outcome. Widely used treatments for COVID-19 and associated complications comprised antibiotics, antivirals, and oxygen therapy. Patients with severe COVID-19 disease required more often mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy compared to those with non-severe COVID-19. Moreover, corticosteroids have been commonly administered to hospitalized patients with severe illness, although their benefit is highly disputed. Evidence from MERS or influenza suggests that patients who were given corticosteroids had prolonged viral replication, receive mechanical ventilation, and have higher mortality196–199. Administration of antibiotics and antivirals was independent of disease-severity.

Pregnant women as well as pediatric and neonatal patients may be less vulnerable to complications of COVID-19. Comorbidities were almost non-existent in these patient cohorts. Clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, imaging features, and treatments were comparable to the adult (non-pregnant) cohort. While there was a considerable proportion of children and neonates with SARS-CoV-2 infections reported, most of these patients did not need hospitalization and recovered quite well. With the exception of a 10-month old neonate, no children were amongst the deaths reported. All pregnant women included in our study survived COVID-19 and associated complications.

4.1. Limitations of review

A limitation of the current review was that literature search was limited to articles listed in EMBASE, PubMed/ Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, or identified by hand searches. Considering the pace at which the research in this area is moving forward, it is likely that the findings of the publications described in this paper will be quickly complemented by further research. The literature search also excluded grey literature (e.g., preprints, reports, conference proceedings), the importance of which to this topic is unknown, and thus might have introduced another source of search bias. There is also a probability of publication bias, as well as potential for a search bias. Publication bias is likely to result in studies with more positive results being preferentially submitted and accepted for publication. Moreover, geographical bias cannot be rule out as the majority of the studies (129/ 148) were conducted in China. While symptoms might be quite comparable across countries, comorbidities, treatments, and outcome potentially depends on the country (and its healthcare system). There is also a considerable risk for a reporting bias towards comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, imaging features, treatment, outcome, and complications that are present. Specifically, only a minority of studies reported a zero when this information was assessed, but absent in patients. Lack of data on absent clinical signs and symptoms might lead to distorted estimates of proportion. The meta-analysis of severity and mortality could only be performed with a small number of studies as the minority of the 148 provided data separately for different disease severity groups (e.g., non-severe, severe, survivors, non-survivors). This needs to be considered when interpreting the results, including the publication bias as the Egger’s test may lack the statistical power to detect bias when the number of studies is small (i.e., < 10). Lastly, the criteria to classify patients in severe and non-severe COVID-19 disease cohorts varied between studies leading to additional heterogeneity between studies. By virtue of low number of studies available, we could not assess this heterogeneity nor adjust for it.

4.2. Conclusion and future directions

In conclusion, this unprecedentedly comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature published during the first 120 days of the COVID-19 pandemic yields important information regarding the comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, imaging features, treatment, outcome, and complications. Male sex, older age, and pre-existing comorbidities are major risk factors for in-hospital mortality and complications. This study revealed a fatality rate of 7.7% and found that approximately 8% of the patients were reportedly asymptomatic. Based on recent reports, the latter number is likely 6- to 10-fold higher as only a few asymptomatic patients are captured by the health care system as they do not seek medical attention due to the lack of symptoms168 or are not hospitalized and thus, included in studies. Unnoticed asymptomatic cases of COVID-19 are likely a major source of ongoing transmission. Children and neonates appear to be the least vulnerable cohort. Forthcoming studies are needed that provide sex-disaggregated data to better characterize risk factors that affect both sexes or are specific to men or women, respectively.

Data Availability

The code used for the analysis and to create figures and tables is provided in our GitHub repository (https://github.com/jutzca/Corona-Virus-Meta-Analysis-2020).

https://github.com/jutzca/Corona-Virus-Meta-Analysis-2020

Authors’ contribution

Catherine Jutzeler

Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, final approval of version to be published.

Lucie Bourguignon

Substantial contributions to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, final approval of version to be published.

Caroline Weis

Acquisition and interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Bastian Rieck

Acquisition and interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Bobo Tong

Acquisition and interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Cyrus Wong

Acquisition and interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Hans Pargger

Substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Sarah Tschudin-Sutter

Substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Adrian Egli

Substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Karsten Borgwardt

Substantial contributions to the interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, final approval of version to be published.

Matthias Walter

Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, final approval of version to be published.

4.3. Conflict of interest

The authors do not report any (financial or otherwise) conflict of interest.

4.4. Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Alfried Krupp Prize for Young University Teachers of the Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach-Stiftung (Borgwardt), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione Grant [PZ00P3_186101, Jutzeler], SNSF Starting Grant [155913, Borgwardt}). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵# These authors share the lead authorship

  • ↵$ These authors share the senior authorship

5. References

  1. 1.↵
    Tuite AR, Bogoch II, Sherbo R, Watts A, Fisman D, Khan K. Estimation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Burden and Potential for International Dissemination of Infection From Iran. Ann Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.7326/m20-0696
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Chan JFW, Yuan S, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, et al. Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Jiang F, Deng L, Zhang L, Cai Y, Cheung CW, Xia Z. Review of the Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Gen Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11606-020-05762-w
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Xu XW, Wu XX, Jiang XG, et al. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: Retrospective case series. BMJ. 2020. doi:10.1136/bmj.m606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Llitjos J-F, Leclerc M, Chochois C, et al. High incidence of venous thromboembolic events in anticoagulated severe COVID-19 patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2020. doi:10.1111/jth.14869
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809–815. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Xu. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series (vol 368, m606, 2020). Bmj-British Med J. 2020;368:1. doi:10.1136/bmj.m792
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. 13.↵
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc. 2000. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005.
  16. 16.↵
    Mathes T, Pieper D. Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: Potential impact on body of evidence and workload. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0391-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    McGrath S, Zhao XF, Qin ZZ, Steele R, Benedetti A. One-sample aggregate data meta-analysis of medians. Stat Med. 2019. doi:10.1002/sim.8013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 2019. doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Bollegala D, Matsuo Y, Ishizuka M. Measuring semantic similarity between words using web search engines. In: 16th International World Wide Web Conference, WWW2007.; 2007. doi:10.1145/1242572.1242675
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Hedges L V., Pigott TD. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 2004. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.426
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Cochran WG. The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments. Biometrics. 1954. doi:10.2307/3001666
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Xu X, Yu C, Qu J, et al. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00259-020-04735-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Ye G, Pan Z, Pan Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reactivation. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Le HT, Nguyen L V, Tran DM, et al. The first infant case of COVID-19 acquired from a secondary transmission in Vietnam. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2020. doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30091-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    Guan Q, Liu M, Zhuang YJ, et al. Epidemiological investigation of a family clustering of COVID-19. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41:629–633. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200223-00152
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. 26.↵
    Wang L, Gao YH, Lou LL, Zhang GJ. The clinical dynamics of 18 cases of COVID-19 outside of Wuhan, China. Eur Respir J. 2020. doi:10.1183/13993003.00398-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Zhang MQ, Wang XH, Chen YL, et al. [Clinical features of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in the early stage from a fever clinic in Beijing]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43(3):215–218. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Ding D, Zhu C, Yao W. A cured patient with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Am J Med. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.023
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. 29.↵
    Chen S, Huang B, Luo DJ, et al. [Pregnant women with new coronavirus infection: a clinical characteristics and placental pathological analysis of three cases]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2020;49(0):E005. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20200225-00138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Hao W. Clinical Features of Atypical 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia with an initially Negative RT-PCR Assay. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. 31.↵
    Spiteri G, Fielding J, Diercke M, et al. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the WHO European Region, 24 January to 21 February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(9). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2020.25.9.2000178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020:200642. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200642
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Cui Y, Tian M, Huang D, et al. A 55-Day-Old Female Infant infected with COVID 19: presenting with pneumonia, liver injury, and heart damage. J Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa113
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.
    Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020. doi:10.1111/all.14238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    Xu Y, Li XF, Zhu B, et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat Med.:9. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.
    Peng YD, Meng K, Guan HQ, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 112 cardiovascular disease patients infected by 2019-nCoV. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020;48:E004. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200220-00105
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2005073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.
    Tong ZD, Tang A, Li KF, et al. Potential Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2, Zhejiang Province, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(5). doi:10.3201/eid2605.200198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.
    Chen J, Qi T, Liu L, et al. Clinical progression of patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.
    Lin X, Gong Z, Xiao Z, Xiong J, Fan B, Liu J. Novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in 2019: Computed tomographic findings in two cases. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(3):365–368. doi:10.3348/kjr.2020.0078
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. 41.
    Xu T, Chen C, Zhu Z, et al. Clinical features and dynamics of viral load in imported and non-imported patients with COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.
    Yao N, Wang SN, Lian JQ, et al. Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia combined with liver injury in Shaanxi region. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2020;28:E003. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200226-00070
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.
    Tang A, Tong ZD, Wang HL, et al. Detection of Novel Coronavirus by RT-PCR in Stool Specimen from Asymptomatic Child, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(6). doi:10.3201/eid2606.200301
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.↵
    Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, et al. Association of Cardiac Injury With Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.
    Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X, Luo N, Ling L. Clinical Outcomes in 55 Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Who Were Asymptomatic at Hospital Admission in Shenzhen, China. J Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.
    Dong L, Tian J, He S, et al. Possible Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 From an Infected Mother to Her Newborn. JAMA. 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4621
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Leung C. Clinical features of deaths in the novel coronavirus epidemic in China. Rev Med Virol. 2020. doi:10.1002/rmv.2103
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. 48.↵
    Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.
    Fan C, Lei D, Fang C, et al. Perinatal Transmission of COVID-19 Associated SARS-CoV-2: Should We Worry? Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa226
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.
    Xiong Y, Sun D, Liu Y, et al. Clinical and High-Resolution CT Features of the COVID-19 Infection: Comparison of the Initial and Follow-up Changes. Invest Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000674
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. 51.
    Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.
    He XW, Lai JS, Cheng J, et al. Impact of complicated myocardial injury on the clinical outcome of severe or critically ill COVID-19 patients. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020;48:E011. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200228-00137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.
    Wei M, Yuan J, Liu Y, Fu T, Yu X, Zhang ZJ. Novel Coronavirus Infection in Hospitalized Infants under 1 Year of Age in China. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2131
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. 54.
    Lee NY, Li CW, Tsai HP, et al. A case of COVID-19 and pneumonia returning from Macau in Taiwan: Clinical course and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG dynamic. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.
    Yuan M, Yin W, Tao Z, Tan W, Hu Y. Association of radiologic findings with mortality of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. PLoS One. 202015(3):e0230548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    Wang Z, Chen X, Lu Y, Chen F, Zhang W. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic procedure for four cases with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia receiving combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment. Biosci Trends. 2020;14(1):64–68. doi:10.5582/bst.2020.01030
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. 57.↵
    Hosoda T, Sakamoto M, Shimizu H, Okabe N. SARS-CoV-2 enterocolitis with persisting to excrete the virus for about two weeks after recovering from diarrhea: A case report. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020:1–4. doi:10.1017/ice.2020.87
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. 58.
    Zhu Y, Liu YL, Li ZP, et al. Clinical and CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. 59.
    Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of 21 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.
    Song Y, Liu P, Shi XL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 induced diarrhoea as onset symptom in patient with COVID-19. Gut. 2020. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320891
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  61. 61.
    Qu R, Ling Y, Zhang YH, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with prognosis in patients with Corona Virus Disease-19. J Med Virol. 2020. doi:10.1002/jmv.25767
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. 62.
    Cheng Z, Lu Y, Cao Q, et al. Clinical Features and Chest CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Single-Center Study in Shanghai, China. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020:1–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.22959
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.
    Jin X, Lian JS, Hu JH, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus-infected disease 2019 (COVID-19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320926
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.
    Xu Z, Shi L, Wang Y, et al. Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.
    Cai JH, Wang XS, Ge YL, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children in Shanghai. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58:E002. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.0002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.
    Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    Chen C, Chen C, Yan JT, Zhou N, Zhao JP, Wang DW. [Analysis of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 and association between concomitant cardiovascular diseases and severity of COVID-19]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020;48(0):E008. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200225-00123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.
    Deng Y, Liu W, Liu K, et al. Clinical characteristics of fatal and recovered cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study. Chin Med J. 2020. doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000000824
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  69. 69.
    COVID-19 National Emergency Response Center E and CMT, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Korea C. Early Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of 28 Cases of Coronavirus Disease in South Korea. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect. 2020;11(1):8–14. doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.1.03
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.
    Wan S, Xiang Y, Fang W, et al. Clinical Features and Treatment of COVID-19 Patients in Northeast Chongqing. J Med Virol. 2020. doi:10.1002/jmv.25783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.
    Zhang X, Song W, Liu X, Lyu L. CT image of novel coronavirus pneumonia: a case report. Jpn J Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11604-020-00945-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  72. 72.
    Ding Q, Lu P, Fan Y, Xia Y, Liu M. The clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients co-infected with 2019 novel coronavirus and influenza virus in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020. doi:10.1002/jmv.25781
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. 73.
    Xu YH, Dong JH, An WM, et al. Clinical and computed tomographic imaging features of novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.017
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.
    Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63(3):364–374. doi:10.1007/s11427-020-1643-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.
    Chen R, Chen J, Meng QT. Chest computed tomography images of early coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Can J Anesth. 2020. doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01625-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.
    Huang Y, Tu M, Wang S, et al. Clinical characteristics of laboratory confirmed positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan, China: A retrospective single center analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101606
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. 77.↵
    Lian J, Jin X, Hao S, et al. Analysis of Epidemiological and Clinical features in older patients with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) out of Wuhan. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa242
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  78. 78.↵
    Zhao D, Yao F, Wang L, et al. A comparative study on the clinical features of COVID-19 pneumonia to other pneumonias. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa247
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  79. 79.
    Young BE, Ong SWX, Kalimuddin S, et al. Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA. 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.
    Qian G, Yang N, Ma AHY, et al. A COVID-19 Transmission within a family cluster by presymptomatic infectors in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.
    Liu W, Tao ZW, Lei W, et al. Analysis of factors associated with disease outcomes in hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000775
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. 82.
    Xie C, Jiang L, Huang G, et al. Comparison of different samples for 2019 novel coronavirus detection by nucleic acid amplification tests. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:264–267. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.050
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.
    Wang J, Wang D, Chen GC, Tao XW, Zeng LK. [SARS-CoV-2 infection with gastrointestinal symptoms as the first manifestation in a neonate]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;22(3):211–214.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. 84.
    Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY. Pulmonary Pathology of Early-Phase 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia in Two Patients With Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.
    Wu T, Kang SC, Feng W, et al. Biological characters analysis of COVID-19 patient accompanied with aplastic anemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41:E003. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.0003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. 86.
    Liu W, Zhang Q, Chen J, et al. Detection of Covid-19 in Children in Early January 2020 in Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2003717
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. 87.↵
    Feng K, Yun YX, Wang XF, et al. Analysis of CT features of 15 Children with 2019 novel coronavirus infection. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58:E007. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.0007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. 88.↵
    Fang Z, Zhang Y, Hang C, Zhang W, Ai J, Li S. Comparisons of nucleic acid conversion time of SARS-CoV-2 of different samples in ICU and non-ICU patients. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. 89.
    Sun Q, Xu X, Xie J, Li J, Huang X. Evolution of Computed Tomography Manifestations in Five Patients Who Recovered from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. Korean J Radiol. 2020. doi:10.3348/kjr.2020.0157
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  90. 90.
    Liu M, He P, Liu HG, et al. [Clinical characteristics of 30 medical workers infected with new coronavirus pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43(3):209–214. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.014
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. 91.
    Silverstein WK, Stroud L, Cleghorn GE, Leis JA. First imported case of 2019 novel coronavirus in Canada, presenting as mild pneumonia. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):734. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30370-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  92. 92.
    Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiological Characteristics of 2143 Pediatric Patients With 2019 Coronavirus Disease in China. Pediatrics. 2020. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-0702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. 93.
    Fang X, Zhao M, Li S, Yang L, Wu B. Changes of CT Findings in a 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia patient. QJM. 2020. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa038
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. 94.
    An P, Song P, Lian K, Wang Y. CT Manifestations of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia: A Case Report. Balkan Med J. 2020. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.2.15
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  95. 95.
    Chen L, Liu HG, Liu W, et al. [Analysis of clinical features of 29 patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43(3):203–208. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.03.013
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  96. 96.
    Li XQ, Cai WF, Huang LF, et al. Comparison of epidemic characteristics between SARS in2003 and COVID-19 in 2020 in Guangzhou. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(5):634–637. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200228-00209
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  97. 97.↵
    Zeng LK, Tao XW, Yuan WH, Wang J, Liu X, Liu ZS. First case of neonate infected with novel coronavirus pneumonia in China. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58:E009. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.0009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. 98.↵
    Mo P, Xing Y, Xiao Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of refractory COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa270
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. 99.
    Li YX, Wu W, Yang T, et al. Characteristics of peripheral blood leukocyte differential counts in patients with COVID-19. Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 2020;59:E003. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L631125257.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  100. 100.
    Wang Z, Yang B, Li Q, Wen L, Zhang R. Clinical Features of 69 Cases with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa272
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. 101.
    Chen F, Liu ZS, Zhang FR, et al. First case of severe childhood novel coronavirus pneumonia in China. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58(3):179–182. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.03.003
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. 102.
    Hu X, Chen J, Jiang X, et al. CT imaging of two cases of one family cluster 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia: inconsistency between clinical symptoms amelioration and imaging sign progression. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10(2):508–510. doi:10.21037/qims.2020.02.10
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  103. 103.
    Shi H, Han X, Zheng C. Evolution of CT Manifestations in a Patient Recovered from 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia in Wuhan, china. Radiology.2020;295(1):20. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200269
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  104. 104.
    Han W, Quan B, Guo Y, et al. The course of clinical diagnosis and treatment of a case infected with coronavirus disease 2019. J Med Virol. 2020;92(5):461–463. doi:10.1002/jmv.25711
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  105. 105.
    Dai WC, Zhang HW, Yu J, et al. CT Imaging and Differential Diagnosis of COVID-19. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020:846537120913033. doi:10.1177/0846537120913033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  106. 106.
    Dong XC, Li JM, Bai JY, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Tianjin. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2020;41(5):638–642. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200221-00146
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  107. 107.↵
    Wang D, Ju XL, Xie F, et al. Clinical analysis of 31 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children from six provinces (autonomous region) of northern China. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58(4):E011. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200225-00138
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  108. 108.↵
    Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020. doi:10.1111/jth.14768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. 109.
    Huang P, Liu T, Huang L, et al. Use of Chest CT in Combination with Negative RT-PCR Assay for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus but High Clinical Suspicion. Radiology. 2020;295(1):22–23. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. 110.
    Zhu ZW, Tang JJ, Chai XP, et al. Comparison of heart failure and 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in chest CT features and clinical characteristics. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020;48:E007. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200218-00093
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  111. 111.
    Li YY, Wang WN, Lei Y, et al. [Comparison of the clinical characteristics between RNA positive and negative patients clinically diagnosed with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43(0):E023. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200214-00095
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. 112.
    Gross A, Thiemig D, Koch FW, Schwarz M, Glaser S, Albrecht T. CT appearance of severe, laboratory-proven coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Caucasian patient in Berlin, Germany. Rofo. 2020. doi:10.1055/a-1138-8783
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  113. 113.
    Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):929–936. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2001191
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. 114.
    Li K, Fang Y, Li W, et al. CT image visual quantitative evaluation and clinical classification of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Eur Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06817-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. 115.
    Fang Y, Zhang H, Xu Y, Xie J, Pang P, Ji W. CT Manifestations of Two Cases of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology. 2020;295(1):208–209. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. 116.
    Sun D, Li H, Lu XX, et al. Clinical features of severe pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan: a single center’s observational study. World J Pediatr. 2020. doi:10.1007/s12519-020-00354-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  117. 117.↵
    Zhang S, Li H, Huang S, You W, Sun H. High-resolution CT features of 17 cases of Corona Virus Disease 2019 in Sichuan province, China. Eur Respir J. 2020. doi:10.1183/13993003.00334-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. 118.
    Hill DKJ, Russell DCD, Clifford DS, et al. The index case of SARS-CoV-2 in Scotland: a case report. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  119. 119.
    Hu Z, Song C, Xu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Sci China Life Sci. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11427-020-1661-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. 120.
    Guan CS, Lv ZB, Yan S, et al. Imaging Features of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Evaluation on Thin-Section CT. Acad Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.002
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  121. 121.
    Zhou Y, Yang GD, Feng K, et al. [Clinical features and chest CT findings of coronavirus disease 2019 in infants and young children]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020;22(3):215–220.
    OpenUrl
  122. 122.
    Liao X, Yang H, Kong J, Yang H. Chest CT Findings in a Pregnant Patient with 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease. Balk Med J. 2020. doi:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2020.2020.3.89
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  123. 123.
    Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhu F, Tang Y, Shen X. A case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in a pregnant woman with preterm delivery. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa200
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. 124.
    Wen R, Sun Y, Xing QS. A patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy in Qingdao, China. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  125. 125.
    Wu J, Liu J, Zhao X, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Imported Cases of COVID-19 in Jiangsu Province: A Multicenter Descriptive Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa199
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  126. 126.
    Yang W, Cao Q, Qin L, et al. Clinical characteristics and imaging manifestations of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19):A multi-center study in Wenzhou city, Zhejiang, China. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  127. 127.↵
    Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020:105949. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.
    Bai SL, Wang JY, Zhou YQ, et al. Analysis of the first cluster of cases in a family of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Gansu Province. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;54:E005. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.0005
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  129. 129.
    Zheng F, Liao C, Fan QH, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Children with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Hubei, China. Curr Med Sci. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11596-020-2172-6
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  130. 130.
    Ruan ZR, Gong P, Han W, Huang MQ, Han M. A case of 2019 novel coronavirus infected pneumonia with twice negative 2019-nCoV nucleic acid testing within 8 days. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000788
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  131. 131.
    Chang, Lin M, Wei L, et al. Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Novel Coronavirus Infections Involving 13 Patients Outside Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1623
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  132. 132.
    Pan Y, Guan H, Zhou S, et al. Initial CT findings and temporal changes in patients with the novel coronavirus pneumonia (2019-nCoV): a study of 63 patients in Wuhan, China. Eur Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06731-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  133. 133.
    Lui K, Fang YY, Deng Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000744
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  134. 134.
    Sun Y, Koh V, Marimuthu K, et al. Epidemiological and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. 135.
    Ji LN, Chao S, Wang YJ, et al. Clinical features of pediatric patients with COVID-19: a report of two family cluster cases. World J Pediatr. 2020. doi:10.1007/s12519-020-00356-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  136. 136.
    Xia H, Zhao S, Wu Z, Luo H, Zhou C, Chen X. Emergency Caesarean delivery in a patient with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 under spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.016
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  137. 137.↵
    Han R, Huang L, Jiang H, Dong J, Peng H, Zhang D. Early Clinical and CT Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020:1–6. doi:10.2214/AJR.20.22961
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  138. 138.↵
    Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. 139.
    Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323(11):1061–1069. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. 140.↵
    Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. 141.
    Yoon SH, Lee KH, Kim JY, et al. Chest Radiographic and CT Findings of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Analysis of Nine Patients Treated in Korea. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(4):494–500. doi:10.3348/kjr.2020.0132
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. 142.
    Guan W, Liu J, Yu C. CT Findings of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Severe Pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020:W1–w2. doi:10.2214/ajr.20.23035
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  143. 143.
    Yao Y, Tian Y, Zhou J, Ma X, Yang M, Wang S. Epidemiological characteristics of 2019-ncoV infections in Shaanxi, China by February 8, 2020. Eur Respir J. 2020. doi:10.1183/13993003.00310-2020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  144. 144.
    Duan YN, Qin J. Pre-and Posttreatment Chest CT Findings: 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology. 2020;295(1):21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200323
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  145. 145.
    Zhang YH, Lin DJ, Xiao MF, et al. 2019-novel coronavirus infection in a three-month-old baby. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese J Pediatr. 2020;58:E006. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2020.0006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  146. 146.
    Liu H, Liu F, Li J, Zhang T, Wang D, Lan W. Clinical and CT imaging features of the COVID-19 pneumonia: Focus on pregnant women and children. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  147. 147.↵
    Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical feature of COVID-19 in elderly patients: a comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. 148.↵
    Tian S, Hu N, Lou J, et al. Characteristics of COVID-19 infection in Beijing. J Infect. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. 149.
    Cheng JL, Huang C, Zhang GJ, et al. [Epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia in Henan]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2020;43(0):E027. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200222-00148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. 150.
    Yu P, Zhu J, Zhang Z, Han Y, Huang L. A familial cluster of infection associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating potential person-to-person transmission during the incubation period. J Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  151. 151.
    Xia W, Shao J, Guo Y, Peng X, Li Z, Hu D. Clinical and CT features in pediatric patients with COVID-19 infection: Different points from adults. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020. doi:10.1002/ppul.24718
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  152. 152.
    Wang S, Guo L, Chen L, et al. A case report of neonatal COVID-19 infection in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa225
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  153. 153.
    Liu Q, Wang RS, Qu GQ, et al. Gross examination report of a COVID-19 death autopsy. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;36(1):21–23. doi:10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2020.01.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  154. 154.
    Van Cuong L, Giang HTN, Linh LK, et al. The first Vietnamese case of COVID-19 acquired from China. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30111-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  155. 155.
    Zhang X, Cai H, Hu J, et al. Epidemiological, clinical characteristics of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection with abnormal imaging findings. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.040
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  156. 156.
    Qian GQ, Yang NB, Ding F, et al. Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of 91 Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Zhejiang, China: A retrospective, multi-centre case series. QJM. 2020. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa089
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  157. 157.↵
    Cheng SC, Chang YC, Fan Chiang YL, et al. First case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(3):747–751. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2020.02.007
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  158. 158.↵
    Fan Q, Pan Y, Wu Q, et al. Anal swab findings in an infant with COVID-19. Pediatr Investig. 2020;4(1):48–50. doi:10.1002/ped4.12186
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  159. 159.
    Albarello F, Pianura E, Di Stefano F, et al. 2019-novel Coronavirus severe adult respiratory distress syndrome in two cases in Italy: An uncommon radiological presentation. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:192–197. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  160. 160.
    Bernard Stoecklin S, Rolland P, Silue Y, et al. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in France: surveillance, investigations and control measures, January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(6). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2020.25.6.2000094
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  161. 161.
    Chen T, Wu D, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study. Bmj. 2020;368:m1091. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1091
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  162. 162.
    Zhao X, Liu B, Yu Y, et al. The characteristics and clinical value of chest CT images of novel coronavirus pneumonia. Clin Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2020.03.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  163. 163.
    Park JY, Han MS, Park KU, Kim JY, Choi EH. First Pediatric Case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(11):e124. doi:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  164. 164.
    Song F, Shi N, Shan F, et al. Emerging 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology. 2020;295(1):210–217. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200274
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  165. 165.↵
    Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000722
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  166. 166.↵
  167. 167.↵
    World Health Organization. WHO Corona Virus Situation Report. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/ Published 2020.
  168. 168.↵
    Day M. Covid-19: four fifths of cases are asymptomatic, China figures indicate. BMJ. 2020. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1375
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  169. 169.
    Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Eurosurveillance. 2020. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  170. 170.↵
    Day M. Covid-19: identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village. BMJ. 2020. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1165
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  171. 171.↵
    Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30243-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  172. 172.↵
    Ruan S. Likelihood of survival of coronavirus disease 2019. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30257-7
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  173. 173.↵
    Montecino-Rodriguez E, Berent-Maoz B, Dorshkind K. Causes, consequences, and reversal of immune system aging. J Clin Invest. 2013. doi:10.1172/JCI64096
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  174. 174.↵
    Fuentes E, Fuentes M, Alarcón M, Palomo I. Immune system dysfunction in the elderly. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2017. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201720160487
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  175. 175.↵
    Opal SM, Girard TD, Ely EW. The Immunopathogenesis of Sepsis in Elderly Patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. doi:10.1086/432007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  176. 176.
    Smits SL, De Lang A, Van Den Brand JMA, et al. Exacerbated innate host response to SARS-CoV in aged non-human primates. PLoS Pathog. 2010. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000756
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  177. 177.↵
    Jin J-M, Bai P, He W, et al. Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: Focus on severity and mortality. medRxiv. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.02.23.20026864
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  178. 178.↵
    Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  179. 179.↵
    Delanghe JR, Speeckaert MM, De Buyzere ML. The host’s angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism may explain epidemiological findings in COVID-19 infections. Clin Chim Acta. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.031
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  180. 180.↵
    Liu S, Zhang M, Yang L, et al. Prevalence and patterns of tobacco smoking among Chinese adult men and women: Findings of the 2010 national smoking survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017. doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207805
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  181. 181.↵
    Judah G, Aunger R, Schmidt WP, Michie S, Granger S, Curtis V. Experimental pretesting of hand-washing interventions in a natural setting. Am J Public Health. 2009. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.164160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  182. 182.↵
    Nordström A, Hadrévi J, Olsson T, Franks PW, Nordström P. Higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes in men than in women is associated with differences in visceral fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016. doi:10.1210/jc.2016-1915
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  183. 183.↵
    Regitz-Zagrosek V, Lehmkuhl E, Weickert MO. Gender differences in the metabolic syndrome and their role for cardiovascular disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006. doi:10.1007/s00392-006-0377-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  184. 184.↵
    Gupte M, Thatcher SE, Boustany-Kari CM, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 contributes to sex differences in the development of obesity hypertension in C57BL/6 mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.248559
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  185. 185.↵
    Asselta R, Paraboschi EM, Mantovani A, Duga S. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Variants and Expression as Candidates to Sex and Country Differences in COVID-19 Severity in Italy. SSRN Electron J. 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3559608
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  186. 186.↵
    Channappanavar R, Fett C, Mack M, Ten Eyck PP, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. Sex-Based Differences in Susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. J Immunol. 2017. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1601896
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  187. 187.↵
    Lin C, Ding Y, Xie B, et al. Asymptomatic novel coronavirus pneumonia patient outside Wuhan: The value of CT images in the course of the disease. Clin Imaging. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  188. 188.↵
    Rodelo JR, De La Rosa G, Valencia ML, et al. D-dimer is a significant prognostic factor in patients with suspected infection and sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.033
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  189. 189.↵
    Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000. doi:10.1378/chest.118.2.503
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  190. 190.
    Short KR, Veeris R, Leijten LM, et al. Proinflammatory Cytokine Responses in Extra-Respiratory Tissues during Severe Influenza. J Infect Dis. 2017. doi:10.1093/infdis/jix281
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  191. 191.↵
    Kube D, Sontich U, Fletcher D, Davis PB. Proinflammatory cytokine responses to P. aeruginosa infection in human airway epithelial cell lines. Am J Physiol-Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001. doi:10.1152/ajplung.2001.280.3.l493
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  192. 192.↵
    Toliver-Kinsky T, Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Sherwood ER. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In: Total Burn Care: Fifth Edition.; 2018. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-47661-4.00019-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  193. 193.↵
    Xiong T-Y, Redwood S, Prendergast B, Chen M. Coronaviruses and the cardiovascular system: acute and long-term implications. Eur Heart J. 2020. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa231
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  194. 194.
    Warny M, Helby J, Nordestgaard BG, Birgens H, Bojesen SE. Lymphopenia and risk of infection and infection-related death in 98,344 individuals from a prospective Danish population-based study. PLoS Med. 2018. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002685
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  195. 195.↵
    Minatoguchi S, Nomura A, Imaizumi T, et al. Low serum albumin as a risk factor for infection-related in-hospital death among hemodialysis patients hospitalized on suspicion of infectious disease: a Japanese multicenter retrospective cohort study. Ren Replace Ther. 2018. doi:10.1186/s41100-018-0173-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  196. 196.↵
    Arabi YM, Mandourah Y, Al-Hameed F, et al. Corticosteroid therapy for critically ill patients with middle east respiratory syndrome.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. doi:10.1164/rccm.201706-1172OC
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  197. 197.
    Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet. 2020. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30317-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  198. 198.
    Zumla A, Hui DS, Perlman S. Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2015. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60454-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  199. 199.↵
    Rodrigo C, Leonardi-Bee J, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Lim WS. Effect of corticosteroid therapy on influenza-related mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2015. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiu645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted May 22, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging features, treatment strategies, and outcomes in adult and pediatric patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Catherine R. Jutzeler, Lucie Bourguignon, Caroline V. Weis, Bobo Tong, Cyrus Wong, Bastian Rieck, Hans Pargger, Sarah Tschudin-Sutter, Adrin Egli, Karsten Borgwardt, Matthias Walter
medRxiv 2020.05.20.20103804; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.20.20103804
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area