Abstract
Background Psychotic-like experiences index an increased risk for subsequent psychotic disorders. A risky family environment is a well-established risk factor for psychotic-like experiences, however different contextual and personal factors may differentially mediate their effect on psychotic-like experiences, including different aspects of resilience.
Objective In this study we propose a two-dimension model of resilience. Our aim is to address separately the mediational role of personal and contextual resilience factors between a risky family environment and PLE in a community sample.
Methods and Materials Five hundred University students completed an on-line questionnaire including the Resilience Scale for Adults, the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire and the Risky Family Questionnaire.
Mediation was assessed using Structural Equation Modelling with bootstrapping estimation of indirect effect.
Results Direct effect of Personal and Contextual resilience on Psychotic-like experiences were respectively −0.69 [−0.97, −0.41] (p<0.001) and −0.19 [−0.58, 0.20] (ns); indirect effects through personal resilience was 0.03[ 0.01, 0.04] (p<0.001). Personal resilience mediated 27.4% of the total effect of risky family environment on psychotic-like experiences.
Discussion Personal resilience, but not contextual resilience, mediated the effect of a risky family environment on Psychotic-like experiences. Poor personal resilience may represent an individual risk factor that transmits the effect of risky family environment on psychotic-like experiences, and could represent a central aspect of individualized prevention and treatment strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
no specific funding was granted for this study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
data available on request by the authors
