Abstract
Objective To determine whether the trajectories of survivors and non-survivors are different in patients admitted to intensive care in London.
Design In this case series of 15 survivors and 16 non-survivors, data from admission to discharge was collected and aligned to lowest PaO2/FiO2 ratio where aggregation and trends were demonstrated.
Setting Single centre case-series in London, Intensive Care.
Participants All non-survivors were included (n = 16). A biased set of survivors (n = 15) who were demonstrated an unexpected and rapid recovery after a prolonged period of mechanical ventilatory support.
Results Respiratory failure trajectories of survivors and non-survivors were similar once aligned indicating, from a respiratory function perspective, it is difficult to identify survivors from non-survivors with some survivors improving late in their disease (day 20 – 30 from symptom onset)
Non-survivors are admitted earlier in their disease (p<0.05) and had worse organ failure requirements prior to the nadir of their respiratory funciton (p<0.05) compard to survivors.
Conclusion Analysis of multiple factors fails to differentiate between survivors and non-survivors. Even when faced with multiorgan failure, perseverance until discharge must be advocated as late improvements do occur in survivors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No data is shared
