Abstract
Improved methods for malaria diagnosis are urgently needed. Here, we evaluated a novel diagnostic test named rotating-crystal magneto-optical detection (RMOD) in 964 suspected malaria patients in Papua New Guinea. RMOD tests can be obtained within minutes and at low cost. Capillary blood samples were also subjected to rapid diagnostic tests, expert light microscopy and polymerase chain reaction to systematically evaluate the capability of RMOD to detect infections. Compared to light microscopy, as the gold standard, RMOD exhibited 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity to detect any malaria infection. This increased to 87% sensitivity and 88% specificity for Plasmodium vivax, indicating that RMOD could be useful in P. vivax dominated elimination settings. Parasite density correlated well with the quantitative magneto-optical signal. Importantly, residual hemozoin present in malaria negative patients was also detectable by RMOD, indicating its ability to detect previous infections, which can be exploited to reveal transmission hotspots in low-transmission settings.
INTRODUCTION
Humans have suffered from malaria for thousands of years and still, hundreds of millions of people are infected each year. Nowadays, malaria also places a significant social and economic burden on tropical developing countries, further undermining potential for growth.[1] Development of rapid, easy-to-use and low-cost malaria diagnostic methods, with high sensitivity and specificity, remains an urgent priority in tropical diseases research.[2, 3] Currently available methods include the inspection of blood smears using light microscopy (LM), rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These techniques rely on different diagnostic targets, namely the direct observation of infected red blood cells (LM), detection of parasite antigens (RDT) or DNA (PCR).
Researchers have also been fascinated by the magnetic properties of malaria infected red blood cells for a long time since using an inherent and unique physical property such as malaria parasite-induced red cell magnetism, may enable rapid and easy diagnosis at low cost. The increased magnetic susceptibility of red blood cells infected with Plasmodium parasites is a striking, and well described biophysical phenomenon arising from the metabolization of hemoglobin.[4–6] Normally, oxygen-bound hemoglobin is a diamagnetic substance with a magnetic susceptibility close to that of water.[7] During infection of red blood cells, Plasmodium parasites break down hemoglobin in their digestive vacuoles and heme molecules liberated in the process are assembled into iron-containing organic crystallites called hemozoin.[8–12] These hemozoin crystals are one of the most distinguishing features of malaria infection in peripheral blood and played a vital role in identifying Plasmodium parasites as the cause of malaria and the mosquito as the agent of transmission in the late 19th century.[13, 14] During the process of hemozoin formation, hemoglobin iron is oxidised and concentrated to make up about 10% of the mass of the newly formed hemozoin crystals, resulting in an overall paramagnetic behaviour of hemozoin.[4] As such, hemozoin is an intrinsic biomagnetic marker of infection with Plasmodium. While the hemozoin crystals are not excreted naturally by the infected cells until cell rupture, they can easily be made accessible for diagnostic purposes by lysing blood.
Several approaches to exploit these magnetic properties for diagnostic purposes have been proposed [15–27] and some of the techniques developed, showed promise under laboratory conditions. However, evaluations of magnet-based tests in larger in-field trials are rare and have, so far, been disillusioning.[16–18, 28, 29]
Over recent years, we developed a novel diagnostic technique, named rotating-crystal magneto-optical detection (RMOD), targeting the aforementioned hemozoin material. We demonstrated that hemozoin can be detected in lysed blood with very high sensitivity in the low ng/μL range using RMOD.[27] Measurements on parasite cultures indicated that RMOD had a limit of detection of ∼ 10 parasites/μL of blood in samples spiked with P. falciparum.[27] These promising results were further supported by studies on P. berghei and P. yoelii-infected mice.[24, 25] On an operational level, RMOD is promising as it can be conducted after minimal training and provide test results within minutes. From a funding perspective, since no expensive reagents are used, per sample measurement cost is very low.
The dynamics of hemozoin accumulation and clearance in natural malaria infections in the human body are more complex than what can be mimicked in model systems, and intermediate redistribution and final fate of hemozoin during and following infections is not well understood.[35] Many mechanisms and intricacies of parasite biology and human response to infection may collectively determine the actual quantity of hemozoin in peripheral blood. For example, infected red blood cells are cleared mostly in the liver and spleen, and as a consequence these organs become loaded with hemozoin.[36, 37] Leukocytes phagocytose infected red blood cells and ingest hemozoin.[38, 39] Late parasite stages of P. falciparum containing large quantities of hemozoin sequester in the capillaries,[40] whereas a higher proportion of late stages of P. vivax keep circulating in peripheral blood. Gametocytes of P. falciparum contain large amounts of hemozoin and circulate for an extended period of time after an infection has been cleared or treated.[41, 42] While many aspects of hemozoin clearance and redistribution in the human body are yet to be elucidated, there is solid evidence for long-term persistence of hemozoin in body tissues of people living in endemic areas.[37]
In order to account for these complexities, which are potentially relevant to hemozoin-based malaria diagnosis, we conducted a detailed evaluation of RMOD on almost 1000 suspected malaria cases in Madang, Papua New Guinea (PNG). PNG has a complex malaria epidemiology and the study area exhibits high transmission intensities for both, P. falciparum and P. vivax.[43] Using a RMOD prototype device similar to that described in our previous studies,[24–27] we systematically compared RMOD performance to conventional diagnostic techniques, namely expert LM, RDT and PCR and found that magneto-optical hemozoin detection is a competitive approach for clinical and in-field malaria diagnosis. Fig. 1 provides an overview of the study site and population (Fig.1A); a brief comparison of conventional diagnostic techniques together with RMOD (Fig.1B), and a schematic illustration of the RMOD measurement principle (Fig. 1C – E).
RESULTS
Study population and infection data
A total of 964 suspected malaria patients were enrolled into the study. All of them had an RDT result, while 951 had a LM result and a PCR result. The overall properties of the patient population and the malaria diagnosis and parasitological results are given in Table 1. Overall, based on LM diagnosis 34% of patients were positive for any malaria infection, as compared to 37% and 35% by RDT and PCR methods, respectively.
Among the three reference methods used in this study, RDT was applied at enrolment, while we had originally planned to use Plasmodium species-specific qPCR as the main reference method. However, the considerable number of qPCR negative, yet expert LM positive samples (47 P.f., 35 P.v.) lead us to conclude that the species-specific qPCR in this study may not have performed optimally. Thus, expert LM was used as the main reference method, which is the standard recommended by WHO. Yet, the PCR results are still considered for comparison.
Comparison of conventional diagnostic methods
When LM was used as the reference standard for comparison with RDT and PCR methods, RDT exhibited a sensitivity of 86.6% and specificity of 87.8%, while PCR showed a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 80.1%. A table showing the commonly used measures of agreement (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and Cohen’s-κ) is included as Supporting Information Table S1.
For the quantitative methods LM and PCR, parasite density and PCR-based gene copy number correlated well (Spearman Rank Correlation: P. falciparum R2 = 0.79; p < 0.0001; P. vivax: R2 = 0.71; p < 0.0001). A correlation plot is shown in Supporting Information Fig. S1.
RMOD results
The median overall magneto-optical (MO) signals for LM positive and LM negative samples were 22.6 mV/V and 1.7 mV/V, respectively. For the RDT positive and negative samples the median MO signals were 15.0 mV/V and 1.7 mV/V, respectively. For PCR positive and negative samples the median MO signals were 7.5 mV/V and 1.7 mV/V, respectively. For all three methods, the differences in the median MO signals for positive and negative samples were highly statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test p-values < 0.0001). A detailed summary of the RMOD results compared to the other methods (LM, RDT, PCR) is shown in Fig. 2.
Since RMOD provides a quantitative measure of hemozoin content in the blood sample and the detected MO signals are continuous, ROC analysis was conducted to determine the cut-off MO signals corresponding to maximum sensitivity and specificity to detect infection per se, as well as infections with specific parasite species. Sensitivity and specificity were determined by selecting the minimum distance from the ROC curve to the [0,1] coordinate indicating 100% sensitivity and specificity. The cut-off values and resulting indicators of agreement between methods are presented in Table II. The ROC curves are included as Supporting Information Fig. S2.
In summary, when based on expert LM as reference standard, ROC analysis indicated that maximum sensitivity and specificity of RMOD for the detection of any Plasmodium infection were 82% and 84%, respectively, and the optimal cut-off value to distinguish between infections and non-infections was 4.47 mV/V. The overall agreement between LM and MO was classified as substantial (κ = 0.65).[44] Sensitivity and specificity increased for P. vivax infections (incl. mixed infections) to 87% and 88%, respectively. When based on PCR as a reference method, MO performed less well with and overall 68% sensitivity and 73% specificity. The overall agreement between PCR and MO was classified as moderate (κ = 0.43). When RDT was used as the reference method, sensitivity was 76% and specificity was 83% with an overall agreement classified as moderate-tosubstantial (κ = 0.58).
One has to keep in mind, that none of the methods used for comparison is a perfect standard, as they also suffer of systematic and stochastic errors. In fact, we will discuss the data obtained for a considerable set of patients later, where RMOD may have detected low-level infections that were not detected by the other methods.
Parasite density as determined by LM correlated well with the MO signals as shown in Fig. 3. On average, P. falciparum infected samples resulted in lower MO values as compared to P. vivax infected samples with similar parasite density. P. falciparum gametocyte containing samples formed a characteristic sub-population, that, on average, exhibited higher MLD values at a similar parasite density when compared with P. falciparum asexual stage samples. The correlation of MO values with parasite density was better for P. vivax (Spearman Rank R = 0.83, p < 0.0001) than for P. falciparum (Spearman Rank R = 0.41, p < 0.0001).
Despite the clear correlation of the MO signal and the parasite density determined by LM, we observed a considerable scatter of the MO signal at a given parasite density. This is natural, as the MO signal depends not only on the density of the parasites but also on the hemozoin content of the parasites, determined by their developmental stage. This alone can explain a considerable variation of the MO signal at any parasite density. However, we also observed considerable MO signal scatter within the sample population which tested negative with all diagnostic methods used for comparison (RDT and LM and PCR), and patients in this group exhibited, on average, higher MO signals than expected from our laboratory-based previous studies.[27]
In addition, the median MO signals in the malaria negative population were statistically significantly higher (more than double) than those measured in a smaller sample of malaria naïve or long-term malaria free volunteers (n = 32), as shown in Fig. 4A. Furthermore, within the malaria negative study population, patients who indicated having had malaria in the last two weeks exhibited significantly higher MO signals. In summary, this indicates that recent infection is associated with residual hemozoin levels, impacting MO diagnosis of acute malaria infection. This hypothesis is further substantiated by the observation that MO signals in the malaria negative (by LM and RDT and PCR) sub-population were highly correlated with malaria positivity rate in the overall population (as determined by LM), when both populations were stratified by age (Fig. 4B, Spearman rank correlation coefficient R = 0.83; p = 0.003). This implies that either i) RMOD detects low-level infections that are not detected by the reference methods or ii) there is a higher residual hemozoin level in populations that are more frequently infected with malaria.
DISCUSSION
Improving malaria diagnosis in support of malaria control and elimination, especially through the development of methods applicable in resource-limited settings is important and timely.[45] Malaria diagnosis is complicated by many factors, including the frequent occurrence of asymptomatic infections with low parasite density.[46]
In this study, we tested a magneto-optical method for automated and rapid measurement of magnetically induced linear dichroism of hemozoin in close to 1000 human blood samples from suspected malaria patients in a high-transmission area of Papua New Guinea (PNG), where both, P. falciparum and P. vivax are common.[47] In order to evaluate the RMOD performance we conducted a comparison with various conventional diagnostic methods, namely expert LM, RDTs and PCR.
RMOD quantifies the amount of hemozoin in the sample. Correspondingly, we observed a strong correlation between the measured MO signals and parasite density in the peripheral blood samples. This also led to a substantial agreement of RMOD not only with LM but also to moderate-to substantial agreement with RDT and PCR methods. More specifically, when compared to expert LM, RMOD exhibited an 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity to detect any malaria infection, and substantial agreement between RMOD and expert LM, characterized by Cohen’s κ = 0.65.[44] Hemozoin-containing trophozoite and schizont stages are known to sequester less frequently in P. vivax than in P. falciparum infections, resulting in a higher proportion of these stages present in peripheral blood during P. vivax infection.[48, 49] Consequently, we observed approximately 10-fold higher average MO signals for P. vivax as compared to P. falciparum (asexual stages only) at similar parasite densities (compare, e.g., Fig. 2A and Fig. 3). Similarly, for samples containing P. falciparum gametocytes, average MO signals were found to be significantly higher in the statistical analyses than for samples containing P. falciparum asexual stages only. This is due to the high per-cell hemozoin content found in P. falciparum gametocytes.[15, 23, 41]
As a result, RMOD sensitivity and specificity to detect P. vivax and mixed infections were significantly higher than that observed for P. falciparum when compared to expert LM and PCR, or, when RDT was used as reference method, sensitivity and specificity was observed to be higher in pLDH positive samples as these more frequently contain P. vivax (compare Table II). Using expert LM as the main reference method, we found that RMOD detected a higher proportion of P. vivax infections than the CareStart RDT (87% vs. 77%) but less P. falciparum infections (80% vs. 92%).
While MO signals were significantly correlated with parasite density (P. vivax: Spearman Rank R = 0.83, p < 0.0001; P. falciparum: Spearman Rank R = 0.41, p < 0.0001), the scatter of MO signals in the malaria negative population (compare Fig.s 3 and 4) led to considerably higher cut-off levels, below which a measurement is considered negative, than the background MO signal level determined using malaria naïve volunteer samples.[26, 27] This led to a seemingly decreased diagnostic performance. The most plausible hypothesis to explain this observation is, that a considerable proportion of the patients had hemozoin in their peripheral blood at levels still detectable by RMOD, yet in the absence of an infection detectable by any of the methods used for comparison.
Low-density, asymptomatic infections that are undetectable to expert LM, conventional PCR and RDTs are highly prevalent in the study area.[46] Such low-level, undetectable infections may still lead to the accumulation of hemozoin in peripheral blood. In addition, hemozoin persists, in the peripheral circulation, usually inside leukocytes, well beyond the time when all parasites are cleared.[50] P. falciparum gametocytes, which, in comparison to asexual stages, contain large amounts of hemozoin, exhibit delayed clearance after antimalarial treatment and may be in circulation for long periods of time.[15, 23, 51] Hemozoin is known to persist in the liver and spleen of previously infected individuals for extended periods of time.[52, 53] On this basis, it is likely that in high transmission settings, such as the setting of the present study, elevated hemozoin levels are maintained in the peripheral blood of a large proportion of the general population, either from concurrent low-level infections that are otherwise undetectable,[54] or from recently treated or cleared infections.
Evidence further supporting this hypothesis, is shown in Fig. 4. Patients indicating a malaria infection within the previous 2 weeks exhibited significantly higher MO signal levels. In addition, samples from n = 32 long-term malaria free or malaria naïve volunteers exhibited much lower MO signal values (median: 0.54 mV/V). When malaria negative patients, who had reported recent malaria infection, were excluded from the ROC analysis, overall sensitivity and specificity in comparison to expert LM increased to 86% and 84%, respectively.
In low-transmission and/or elimination settings, which many countries are currently working towards, the residual hemozoin level in the population will be lower, and the MO signal should approach that measured for long-term malaria free and malaria naïve volunteer samples. This will lead to an increase in the ability of RMOD to discriminate infections in these settings. In order to esmalaria the magnitude of improvement, to be expected when lowering the MO signal threshold to the level observed in long-term malaria free and malaria naïve individuals, we used the distribution of MO signals obtained from these samples (n = 32) together with the distribution of MO signals from samples that were positive for P. vivax by expert LM in the present study (n = 124) in a ROC analysis. This resulted in an expected sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 97%, together with a near perfect agreement between LM and RMOD techniques, with κ = 0.91.
In conclusion, we present an extensive assessment of a promising novel method to diagnose malaria rapidly and at low cost in a high transmission setting and a population of symptomatic, suspected malaria cases in PNG. The present study shows that in such a setting, the MO diagnostic method performs well in comparison to expert LM-based diagnosis, the most reliable reference method in our study. However, residual hemozoin levels presented a significant limitation, compromising the ability of the method to discriminate between actual and recently cleared infections. This limitation is expected to be reduced in low-transmission settings.
In the current state, RMOD cannot distinguish between parasite species in P. falciparum and P. vivax coendemic settings. However, RDTs can also not clearly distinguish parasite species. For example, in this study, RDT was able to distinguish P. vivax (based on the pLDH-line test result) with 60% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Further development of RMOD is ongoing to address species-specific diagnosis, by taking advantage of the species-specific shape and size distributions of hemozoin crystals.[55]
It is worth considering and further exploring the usefulness of RMOD-based hemozoin detection for malaria diagnosis and in epidemiological studies, in particular in low-transmission and elimination settings. Many countries in these settings experience an increase in the proportion of P. vivax infections[56] and it can be expected that P. vivax will represent the vast majority of infections in the malaria end-game outside of Africa. Given the rapid and low-cost measurement possible with RMOD and the promising results in particular for P. vivax, the method may play a beneficial role in such settings.
Since hemozoin is an intrinsic biomarker of Plasmodium spp. infection that persists in peripheral blood (similar to the targets of, e.g., serological antibody tests) it may also qualify RMOD as a tool to detect transmission hotspots in elimination settings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site and sample collection
Madang is located on the North Coast of Papua New Guinea (Fig. 1A). P. falciparum and P. vivax are highly endemic, and P. malaria and P. ovale are also present.[43] Capillary blood samples were collected by qualified nurses or community health workers at Yagaum Rural Hospital located outside of Madang and at Madang Town Clinic in 2017–2018.
Blood samples originated from suspected malaria cases presenting as outpatients at the respective clinics. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT; CareStart™Malaria, Accessbio Inc., USA) and two blood slides for light microscopy were prepared at enrolment. All RDT positive patients received standard antimalarial treatment according to PNG malaria treatment guidelines. This study received ethical clearance by the PNG Institute of Medical Research (PNGIMR) Institutional Review Board and the PNG Medical Research Advisory Committee (MRAC, #16.45).
Samples from n = 12 long-term malaria free and n = 20 malaria naïve volunteers were also measured using RMOD and included in the analysis of the present study. All tests were carried out independently and blinded to the results of each other.
Light microscopy
Light microscopy (LM) was conducted by the PNGIMR microscopy unit consisting of experienced, WHO certified microscopists. Slides were read, and parasite density determined according to WHO guidelines.[57] All slides were read twice, and if there was a significant difference between these first two reads, a third read was conducted by a senior expert microscopist.
DNA Extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction
DNA extraction was performed on 200μL of whole blood using DNA extraction kits for 96 well plates (Favorgen Biotech Corp, Taiwan). DNA was eluted in 30μL of RNAse/DNAse free water. The present study employed a two-step realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol as described previously using molecular probes targeting Plasmodium 18S rRNA genes. Briefly, a screening PCR to exclude negative samples was first run on all samples.[58] Samples that were positive by the screening PCR were then subjected to a species-specific quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) as described elsewhere using a CFX96 Touch real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Pty., Ltd., Australia).[59] Therefore, it was possible to quantify parasite density based on gene copy number. For all reactions, 4μL of the DNA eluate was used, corresponding to DNA material from roughly 33μL of the original sample.
Magneto-optical (MO) measurements
The concept of the rotating-crystal magneto-optical setup and the underlying physical principles of hemozoin detection are described in detail in our former studies[25–27] and the working principle is depicted in Fig. 1 D. In combination with their magnetism, the elongated, rod or brick-shaped hemozoin crystals [55] exhibit anisotropic optical properties, in particular, magnetically induced linear dichroism. Here, we refer to this effect as the magneto-optical (MO) signal, which is the marker-signal of our hemozoin-based diagnosis.[19, 26]
Briefly, the hemolysed blood sample, transferred into a cylindrical sample holder, is inserted into the center of a ring-shaped assembly of permanent magnets, which creates a strong uniform magnetic field (B = 1T) at the sample position. This magnetic field induces the coalignment of the hemozoin crystals, and when the magnetic ring is rotated, the co-aligned hemozoin crystals follow this rotation. During the measurement, polarized light from a laser diode is transmitted through the sample in the direction perpendicular to the plane of rotation of the magnetic field. The rotation of the co-aligned dichroic crystals gives rise to a periodic change in the detected intensity. The modulated intensity, divided by the mean intensity, corresponds to the measured ‘MO signal’, which is displayed in the corresponding figures in mV/V units.[25] For the preparation of the blood lysates, 35μL of whole blood was mixed with 315μL of lysis solution(13.3 mM of NaOH and 0.03% v/v of Triton X-100 in distilled water) and allowed to stand for at least 10 minutes to ensure complete lysis. Thereafter, 280μL of the lysate was transferred into the optical sample holders and RMOD were performed without further delay. The optical measurement of a single sample took approximately 3 − 5 minutes (Fig. 1 B). Samples for MO measurements were prepared in triplicate per blood sample.
In general, optical samples were prepared and measured immediately after collection and transport to the laboratory (n = 943), but n = 21 samples were frozen overnight before preparation and MO measurement due to logistical constraints such as power cuts.
Data analysis
Data were entered into an electronic data capture system (Epicollect 5, Imperial College). Proportions are presented alongside their exact 95% confidence intervals.[60] Continuous data are presented as means (95% confidence intervals) for normally distributed data and medians with interquartile range or range for not normally distributed data.
Expert light microscopy (LM), PCR and RDT results were used to compare against the RMOD results. Following the recommendation of WHO, LM was used as the gold standard. Methods were compared by calculating the sensitivity and specificity, predictive values and agreement (κ) with respect to the reference method.[61] Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cut-offs for the continuous RMOD data to best predict presence or absence of infection, i.e., to determine sensitivity and specificity by calculating the minimum distance between the ROC curve and the [0,1] coordinate indicating 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity.[62]
Data Availability
Data will be made available by the corresponding authors upon request
General
The authors would like to sincerely thank all study participants. We thank Yagaum Hospital and Madang Town Clinic staff for their collaboration in this research study. We would like to thank Professor William Pomat, Dr. Livingstone Tavul, the PNGIMR microscopy unit, molecular parasitology and entomology laboratory staff for their support.
Funding
SK (GNT1141441) and LJR (GNT1161627) are recipients of an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship. This study was funded by NHMRC Project Grant (GNT1127356). LT is supported by a James Cook University PhD scholarship.
Author contributions
Conceived the study: IK, SKa; Developed and tested the RMOD prototype, previous volunteer measurements, conducted training: IK, AO, AB, PM, BM; Conducted MO measurements in PNG: LA, CI, PK, TK; Performed PCR analyses: TK, LT, EN; Coordinated Microscopy: LL; Data analysis: AO, SKa, LA, SKr, IK; Wrote first draft: SKa, AO, SKr, IK;
Coordinated field study
SKa, LJR, ML.
Competing interests
There are no competing interests.
Data and materials availability
Data will be made available by the corresponding authors upon request.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Fig. S1. Correlation of parasite density, as determined by LM, and PCR copy number for P. falciparum and P. vivax.
Fig. S2.. Results of the ROC analysis of RMOD versus the conventional diagnostic methods.
Table S1. Diagnostic performance indicators of RDT and PCR methods compared to expert light microscopy as reference standard.
Table S2. Cut-off values to characterise sensitivity and specificity resulting from ROC analysis performed using different reference methods (LM, PCR, RDT) and different infection characteristics.
Supporting Information
Magneto-optical diagnosis of symptomatic malaria in Papua New Guinea
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
References
- [1].↵
- [2].↵
- [3].↵
- [4].↵
- [5].
- [6].↵
- [7].↵
- [8].↵
- [9].
- [10].
- [11].
- [12].↵
- [13].↵
- [14].↵
- [15].↵
- [16].↵
- [17].
- [18].↵
- [19].↵
- [20].
- [21].
- [22].
- [23].↵
- [24].↵
- [25].↵
- [26].↵
- [27].↵
- [28].↵
- [29].↵
- [30].↵
- [31].
- [32].
- [33].
- [34].↵
- [35].↵
- [36].↵
- [37].↵
- [38].↵
- [39].↵
- [40].↵
- [41].↵
- [42].↵
- [43].↵
- [44].↵
- [45].↵
- [46].↵
- [47].↵
- [48].↵
- [49].↵
- [50].↵
- [51].↵
- [52].↵
- [53].↵
- [54].↵
- [55].↵
- [56].↵
- [57].↵
- [58].↵
- [59].↵
- [60].↵
- [61].↵
- [62].↵