Abstract
Objectives To evaluate if the US governors’ decision to issue the stay-at-home orders reflects the classic Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics, the amount by which a stimulus (such as number of cases or deaths) must increase in order to be noticed-the “just noticeable difference”-as a fraction of the intensity of that stimulus.
Design A prospective observational study using data on the daily number of infected patients and deaths from the New York Times daily database.
Setting 50 States and the District of Columbia
Participants All individuals judged to be positive for the coronavirus or to have died from COVID19.
Main outcome measures Number of people diagnosed with or died from COVID19.
Results We found that the decision to issue the state-at-home order reflects the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics. Both the number of infections (p=<0.0001; R2=0.79) and deaths (p<0.0001; R2=0.63) were highly statistically significantly associated with the decision to issue the stay-at-home orders. The results indicate that for each doubling of infections or deaths within their state, an additional four to six governors will issue the stay-at-home order. We also observed a clear dose-response relationship in the Cox model: the larger the number of cases, or deaths, the higher the probability that the stay-at-home order will be made. When the number of deaths reached 256 or the number of infected people was greater than 16,384, the probability of issuing a “stay-at-home” order was close to 100%.
Conclusions When there are not clearly articulated rules to follow, decision-makers in times of crisis such as COVID19 resort to use of simple heuristics consistent with the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics. The findings are important for the public to understand how their elected officials make important public health decisions.
Strengths and limitations of this study
The study was based on individual, publicly available patient data accessible to both researchers and policy-makers.
The US governors seemed to be wired to act according to the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics
The Weber-Fechner function explained 60-80% of the variance in the governors’ decisions. Typically, explanatory factors in decision-making fields capture at best 30% of such variance.
The accuracy of data and reporting practices could not be independently verified.
We demonstrated an association but not a causal relation-we have identified the stimulus that underlies the decision, but we do not know why some governors acted more quickly than others.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No formal funding support was available for this study
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data for the analysis reported in the paper are publicly available
