Summary
Background As of May 1, 2020, there had been over three million of officially confirmed cases of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections reported worldwide. The pandemic originated from a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a virus similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The dynamics of the pathogen incurred the incidence of the unidentified cases that were potentially substantial in magnitude. Unparalleled extensive measures, either in terms of medical quarantine or non-medical containment, were taken to deplete the growth of infected population and thereafter settle down the outbreak. We aimed to estimate the gap in sizes and peak dates between the confirmed and unconfirmed, and how containment measures impacted the dynamic trajectory of the COVID-19 in Japan. We performed simulations and desired to provide meaningful insight for the upcoming responses to the outbreak, for which much still remained to be unknown.
Methods To examine the differentiation between identified and unidentified cases, and how heterogeneity of medical quarantine and non-medical control were associated with the advancement of the outbreak dynamics, we employed the susceptible-infected-removed-contained (SIR-C) model that derived from the basic SIR concept where the target population was divided into three differentiated compartments: (S)usceptibles (be subject to infections), (I)nfected (confirmed infections) and (R)emoved (not in the procedure of transmission due to the reason of either recovered or died). By applying the transmission model to the latest outbreak data in Japan, we established the least-squares fitted estimates parameters and the epidemiological trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. In compliance with the estimated framework, we simulated the ongoing trend of outbreak in Japan by calibrating the potential changes in measures ceteris paribus starting April 7, the date when the state of emergency was declared. We assumed a variety of settings and simulated how the heterogeneity in containment shifted the subsequent advancement of the outbreak.
Findings The epidemiologically estimated outcomes with least-squares fitting indicated a gap between the confirmed and unconfirmed cases in terms of size and peak dates. The saturation size of the reported infections was comparative to the unidentified infections in magnitude contingent on the duration of infection (DOI). However, peak dates for the former delayed by nearly two-and-half months. The declaration of state of emergency incurred changed patterns in social behaviors and sub-exponential growth of the outbreak. Medical and non-medical measures were effective in controlling the outbreak of COVID-19. By assuming a changed pattern of containment measures since April 7, a diminishing growth of infections and reduced saturation of cases were to be observed, accompanied by an earlier arrival of peak dates. However, the modelled effects of quarantine and control measures vary with the unclear infectiousness and the attributes of containment.
Interpretation As the number of infected cases, especially of those asymptomatic, mild symptomatic and infection-route-unknown cases, was growing over time, it was of importance to verify the assumption of the potential existence of the gap in size between those already identified and those not. Our analysis reinforced this by quantifying this magnitude. The trend curve of reported cases differentiated from unidentified cases with a time-lagged effect. Containment measures, if followed effectually, would probably help reduce the spread of epidemic. Our simulations suggested that 1% of growth in rate of non-medical containment could approximately predate the peak by 18 days and reduce the peak size by one-thirds. Commensurate level of containment effect was to be reached when the rate of medical quarantine was increased ten-folds. We thus projected that changes in interventions could lead to an earlier peak date but reduced peak size, which could be flattened by calibrating the interventions gradually. Limitations of our research include the uncertainties in the estimates of duration of infection and the reproduction number.
Funding Philosophy and Social Sciences Association in FuJian, Science and Technology Development Center of the Ministry of Education.
Evidence before this research COVID-19 pandemic was reported to emerge in late 2019 and cases were reported ever since. China adopted multiple options of efforts including medical quarantine and non-medical measures, such as isolation of cases, physical distancing, contact tracing, school closure and workplace shutdown, at a national level to break down the spread of COVID-19. By significantly decreasing the likelihood of close proximity person-to-person contact, these measures took effect and by the end of March 2020 the reported cases lowered dramatically. Japan identified its first case of COVID-19 on Jan 22, 2020 and dynamic exponential-like growth of cases was observed since. The investigation of epidemiological feature for containment measures in other countries attracted much attention; in contrast, the trajectory for Japan remained to be unclear. We searched web of science and science direct for research published in English from 2019 up to May 6, 2020, with the terms “ coronavirus control or containment measures” in combination with “Japan” and identified 6 and 5 results respectively. Relatively little was known about the gap in size and in peak time between the confirmed and unconfirmed in Japan; how containment measures influenced its trajectory of COVID-19 since the state of emergency was declared; and how the shift of the pandemic was influenced by the containment.
Added value of this study The measures studied were divided into two broad ranges in Japan: medical quarantine and non-medical containment. Medical quarantine typically corresponded to cases with severe symptoms that need urgent care; in comparison, non-medical measures consisted of a wider variety of control by complementing the effect of quarantine and corresponded to cases such as asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, mild symptomatic patients and the susceptibles. We found that the declaration of state of emergency incurred social behaviors change and was in connection with subsequent sub-exponential growth of cases. Our study implied the essential existence of gap, subsequently quantified its asymptotic size and its peak timing between the identified and the unidentified. Time-delaying effect in saturation was meaningful in that it provided the information to understand the intrinsic intra-correlation of an epidemic like COVID-19. The outcomes of simulation implied that early containment measures which linked to a reduced and predated peak, were crucial to control further spread. A dynamic transmission model was employed to assess the potential trajectory starting the point of emergency declaration.
Implications of all the available evidence The efficacy of containment has been identified in China and induced changes of behaviors in individuals responsive to the pandemic where asymptomatic, mildly symptomatic and infection-route-unknown cases were not to be ascertained. This might be of great importance for developing control strategies for currently yet to be convergent communities or possibly subsequent cyclical outbreaks of COVID-19. It was of difficulty to estimate the accurate gap in practice; however, asymptotic measures could deliver information that tended to be ignored. Medical quarantine and non-medical measures were at work during the COVID-19 outbreak and the test of heterogeneity on its quantitative and qualitative efficacy in different countries might assist to uncover more on the unknown of this pathogen. Parameter-fitted simulations could provide decision makers with scenarios not reflected in the available information and thus the insights on timely and prioritized decisions even in the uncertainties such as COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Philosophy and Social Sciences Association in FuJian, Science and Technology Development Center of the Ministry of Education.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data is in the process of uploading to GitHub.
