Abstract
Background Acute ingestion of alcohol impairs cognitive function and poses significant threat to public health and safety with impaired operation of motor vehicles. However, there is a lack of access to tools to assess one’s cognitive impairment due to alcohol. The purpose of this study was to explore the use of a neuropsychological assessment software, BrainCheck, to assess levels of alcohol impairment based on performance on the neuropsychological assessments.
Methods We administered the BrainCheck battery to 91 volunteer participants. Participants were required to take a baseline battery prior to any alcohol ingestion, and another testing battery after a voluntary drinking period. Blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for the participant was obtained using a breathalyzer. We performed statistical analysis comparing alcohol vs. non-alcohol performance on the BrainCheck battery, and used significant metrics of these assessments to generate predictive models.
Results Statistical analyses were performed comparing participants’ performance on the BrainCheck battery before and after alcohol consumption. Comparison was also done comparing performance between an intoxicated group with a BAC > 0.05, and a sober group with a BAC ≤ 0.05. Two assessment metrics were found to be significant among comparison groups after P-value correction, and four test metrics were observed to moderately correlate (|r| > 0.40) with BAC levels. Three linear regression models (least-squares, ridge and LASSO) were built to predict participant BAC levels, with the best performing model being the least-squares model with a RMSE of 0.027. We also built a predictive logistic regression model to detect whether the participant is intoxicated or not, with 80.6% accuracy, 73.3% sensitivity, and 75.0% specificity.
Discussion The BrainCheck battery has potential to predict alcohol impairment, including participant BAC levels and if the participant is intoxicated or not. BrainCheck provides another option to assess an individual’s cognitive impairment due to alcohol, with the utility of being portable and available on one’s smartphone.
Competing Interest Statement
The following authors declare the following competing interests: BF, YK, BH, RHG reports personal fees from BrainCheck, outside the submitted work; DME, BF, YK, BH, RHG reports receiving stock options from BrainCheck.
Funding Statement
Funding was provided by BrainCheck, Inc.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data may be made available by contacting the corresponding author and with a data use agreement.
