Abstract
Importance Reducing geographic disparities in antibiotic prescribing is a central public health priority to combat antibiotic resistance, but the drivers of this variation have been unclear.
Objective To measure how differences in outpatient visit rates per 1,000 individuals (‘observed disease’) and in antibiotic prescribing rates per outpatient visit (‘stewardship’) each contributed to a gap in monthly antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 individuals in Boston vs. the rest of Massachusetts, and to identify spatial correlates of the medical conditions that contributed most to the gap.
Design We conducted an observational study of medical insurance claims collected between January 2011 and September 2015.
Setting Outpatient visits in Massachusetts.
Participants 5,028,609 Massachusetts residents under the age of 65 with at least one full month of primary medical insurance during the study period.
Exposures Residence in Boston vs. the rest of Massachusetts.
Main outcomes (1) The proportion of the gap in antibiotic prescribing rate between Boston and the rest of Massachusetts attributable to observed disease vs. stewardship for 20 medical conditions previously associated with antibiotic prescribing; and (2) geographic correlations between childhood vaccination, air pollution, density of children, and social deprivation index with the medical conditions that best explain the gap in prescribing.
Results The average monthly antibiotic prescribing rate per 1,000 individuals in Boston was 51.8 (IQR 43.4, 57.5) vs. 65.2 (IQR 54.8, 74.5) in the rest of Massachusetts. Geographic differences in outpatient visit rates accounted for 56.0% of the gap in antibiotic prescribing between Boston and the rest of the state, while differences in stewardship accounted for just 19.8% of the gap. Geographic differences in outpatient visit rates for sinusitis, pharyngitis, and suppurative otitis media accounted for 43.3% of the gap in prescribing between Boston and the rest of Massachusetts. Social deprivation index best explains the geographic variation in outpatient visit rates for respiratory illness, with fewer visits in census tracts with higher social deprivation index.
Conclusions and relevance Interventions aimed at reducing geographic disparities in antibiotic prescribing should target the drivers of outpatient visits for respiratory illness and should account for possible under-utilization of health services in areas with the lowest antibiotic consumption. Our findings challenge the conventional wisdom that prescribing practices are the main driver of geographic disparities in antibiotic use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no funding for this work.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available publicly from https://www.chiamass.gov/
