Abstract
Background Parental criticism is correlated with internalising symptoms in adolescent offspring. This correlation could in part reflect their genetic relatedness, if the same genes influence behaviours in both parents and offspring. We use a Children-of-Twins design to assess whether parent-reported criticism and offspring internalising symptoms remain associated after controlling for shared genes. To aid interpretation of our results and those of previous Children-of-Twins studies, we examine statistical power for the detection of genetic effects and explore the direction of possible causal effects between generations.
Methods Data were drawn from two Swedish twin samples, comprising 876 adult twin pairs with adolescent offspring and 1030 adolescent twin pairs with parents. Parent reports of criticism towards their offspring were collected concurrently with parent and offspring reports of adolescent internalising symptoms. Children-of-Twins structural equation models were used to control for genetic influence on the intergenerational association between parental criticism and adolescent internalising.
Results Parental criticism was associated with adolescent internalising symptoms after controlling for genetic influence. No significant role was found for shared genes influencing phenotypes in both generations, although power analyses suggested that some genetic effects may have gone undetected. Models could not distinguish directionality for non-genetic, causal effects between generations.
Conclusions Parental criticism may be involved in psychosocial family processes in the context of adolescent internalising. Future studies should seek to identify these processes and provide clarity on the direction of potential causal effects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Leverhulme Trust grant awarded to TE (RPG-210). TE is part-funded by a program grant from the UK MRC (MR/V012878/1); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; and Kings College London. TM and YA were supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (107706/Z/15/Z) and a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship (220382/Z/20/Z), both awarded to TM. The TOSS was supported by grant R01MH54610 from NIMH (Cohort 1 PI: DR; Cohort 2 PI: JN). The TCHAD was funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2004-0383) and Swedish Research Council (2004-1415).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Written consent was obtained from all participants and ethical approval from the Institutional Review Boards of the home institutions concerned (Lichtenstein et al., 2007; Neiderhiser & Lichtenstein, 2008).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have edited to improve the overall clarity of our text. Further, we now include a more thorough description of our direction of causation analyses in Supplementary Text 2, alongside new results that we generated in the process of exploring these models.
1 Single-generation, univariate twin model results (available on request) confirmed that variance in adolescent internalising symptoms was not explained by environmental factors shared between twins (C; β=√<.001, 95% CI .00-.12). Therefore, any effects of parental criticism that were shared between twins and not attributable to genetic similarities (alongside other shared environmental influences) were not large enough to be detected as a significant source of variation for adolescent internalising.
Data Availability
Study data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions. Data access is available to researchers on request, subject to data sharing agreements.