ABSTRACT
Purpose Optic disc (OD) and cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, while an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to segment OD and OC in fundus photos, and evaluate how the algorithm compares against manual annotations.
Methods A total of 1200 fundus photos with 120 glaucoma cases were collected. The OD and OC annotations were labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists, and glaucoma diagnoses were based on comprehensive evaluations of the subject medical records. A deep learning system for OD and OC segmentation was developed. The performances of segmentation and glaucoma discriminating based on the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of automated model were compared against the manual annotations.
Results The algorithm achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.934-0.941), OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI, 0.793-0.809), and CDR mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI, 0.073-0.082). For glaucoma discriminating based on CDR calculations, the algorithm obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI, 0.920-0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI, 0.794-0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI, 0.798-0.918).
Conclusions We demonstrated the potential of the deep learning system to assist ophthalmologists in analyzing OD and OC segmentation and discriminating glaucoma from non-glaucoma subjects based on CDR calculations.
Translational Relevance We investigate the segmentation of OD and OC by deep learning system compared against the manual annotations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵+ These authors share corresponding authorship.
↵# iChallenge-GON study group includes:
Dr. Chunman Yang: The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Kaili, Guizhou, China.
Dr. Fengbin Lin: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dr. Huang Luo: Guangzhou Hospital of TCM, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dr. Hao Li: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dr. Huixin Che: Aier Eye Hospital, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China.
Dr. Nuhui Li: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dr. Yazhi Fan: The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, China.
Financial Support: The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Conflict of Interest: no conflicting relationship exists for any author.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
- OD
- optic disc
- OC
- optic cup
- CDR
- cup-to-disc ratio
- MAE
- mean absolute error
- CI
- confidence interval
- AUC
- area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
- ONH
- optic nerve head
- RNFL
- retinal nerve fiber layer
- IOP
- intraocular pressure
- VF
- visual fields
- SD
- standard deviation
- OCT
- optical coherence tomography
- AS-OCT
- anterior segment OCT
