COVID-19 Induced Anxiety and Protective Behaviors During COVID-19 Outbreak: Scale Development and Validation

1 Introduction

On the last day of 2019, 44 pneumonia cases with unknown etiology were reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) Country Office of China.¹ This was the first cluster of what would be defined later as coronavirus disease (COVID-19). By January 30th 2020, the WHO had recognized it as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) due to its rapid spread to 18 countries outside China with recorded cases of human-to-human transmission.² During the following six weeks, more cases were recorded in 114 countries and the death toll reached 4291. Therefore, the WHO declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11th 2020, aimed to accelerate the measures undertaken by the member states to avoid an exponential growth of cases which had already occurred in several countries around the world especially in Europe which was recognized as an epicenter of COVID-19 on March 13th 2020.^{3, 4}

Non-pharmacologic Interventions (NPIs) are deemed inevitable during the outbreaks of emerging communicable diseases due to a lack of effective drugs and vaccines. The NPIs including public quarantine, social distancing, and case investigation and isolation proved their efficacy in decreasing the production rate in countries that applied aggressive measures e.g. China, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.⁵

The outbreak of communicable diseases is widely perceived as a traumatic event leading to a significant increase in anxiety, depression and fear levels.^6,7 During the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)⁸ and the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)⁹, the quarantined individuals had more negative emotions like anxiety and anger which are consistent with the findings from isolated mice experiments.¹⁰ Hu et al. found that the type of quarantine can affect the level of anxiety during the COVID-19 outbreak in China.¹¹ Mass quarantine restrictions on non-emergency health services including psychiatric care may adversely affect the access of vulnerable populations to mental health care which cannot be provided by health professionals in isolation units and hospitals due to a lack of specialized training.^7,12

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition characterized by heightened anxiety that can also occur in response to diseases outbreaks. The immediate increase of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among patients, healthcare workers, and general population following outbreaks of the SARS, MERS, Ebola, and Zika – had been studied longitudinally in order to evaluate the long-term consequences of these diseases’ outbreaks. SARS survivors with PTSD experienced persistent psychological distress and diminished social functioning in the 4 years after SARS treatment.¹³ Frontline healthcare workers of MERS in South Korea were found experiencing PTSS until 3 years after the outbreak with numbness and sleeping disorders in the high-risk group.¹⁴ In Italy, 37% of a national survey respondents had PTSS during the 3rd and 4th weeks of lockdown measures – suggesting that monitoring of population’s mental health should be a critical priority during pandemics.¹⁵

Psychobehavioral surveillance is critical for public health response during communicable disease outbreaks because it informs risk awareness strategies targeting general populations and high-risk groups.¹⁶ Perceived risk during communicable disease outbreaks motivates people to adopt protective behaviors to reduce any potential hazards of an emerging epidemic.¹⁷ The relationship between fear and protective behaviors is not linear, but it can be explained by the inverted U-shaped Fear Drive Model of Janis which demonstrates that a moderate level of fear motivates people to adapt protective behavior but when this level is too high or too low, people are more likely to engage in risky behaviors.¹⁸ Protective behaviors were found to be significantly influenced by the level of knowledge and use of social media during the outbreak of COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza, and to positively impact the epidemic week and viral serial interval.^16,17,19

Public awareness is a predictor variable which has been associated with both emotions and behaviors during the outbreaks of COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza. Knowledge of the mechanisms of infection transmission and common symptoms are usually found to be sufficient among public, however knowledge of prevention and care-seeking strategies may be distorted by misconceptions and inaccurate information.^20,21

Infodemic in response to communicable diseases outbreak is an inevitable challenge for public health strategies which occurs as a tsunami of health-related information during early phases of the outbreak – making it challenging for laymen to act properly because of confusing, contradictory, or false information (i.e., fake news), therefore it should be contained in order to escalate behavioral change of public in a predicted manner.²²

Notably, the definition of “high-risk” groups does not always correlate between epidemiology and psychology. The high-risk groups for infection, disease progression and fatality are predicted to develop more anxious emotions and different patterns of behaviors based on their elevated perceived risk levels. Young adults also form a particular high-risk group during health crises, because they are more susceptible to be influenced by fake news from social media, to have high levels of anxiety and depression, and to engage in risk behaviors.^6,11,23,24

During communicable disease outbreaks, public health and psychology researchers race against time to assess the early consequences of the emerging phenomena, therefore they typically adopt generic instruments which might not be specific for use in crises settings. To the best of our knowledge, there are no valid instruments to evaluate the induced anxiety, protective behaviors, and public knowledge following communicable disease outbreaks. Therefore, the primary objective of this work was to develop and validate the COVID-19 Induced Anxiety Scale (CIAS), Protective Behaviors towards COVID-19 Scale (PBCS) and COVID-19 Related Knowledge Scale (CRKS). The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between communicable disease outbreak induced anxiety, epidemic related knowledge, and protective behavioral tendencies of the adult population.

2 Methods

3 Results

3.4 Structural Equation Model (SEM) for Induced-Anxiety and Related-Knowledge on Protective Behaviors

Before the SEM, the multiple regression was set up to probe if individual’s demographic information (including gender and academic level) can predict protective behaviors. The results remarked gender accounts for 5% variance of individual’s protective behaviors and that academic level does not explain the protective behaviors. For examining gender’s effect in greater detail, the T-test was done to compare the gender difference in protective behaviors. The outcome inferred females have significantly more protective behaviors than males (t= 3.3, p<0.01). And the COVID-19 induced anxiety and COVID-19 related knowledge account for the variance of protective behaviors by additional 22%.

Theoretically, people’s related knowledge and the anxiety level should influence people’s behaviors towards COVID-19. The Figure 1 depicts the impact of individual’s COVID-19 related knowledge and COVID-19 induced anxiety on the protective behaviors as tested using SEM.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

The SEM for describing the impact of COVID-19 related knowledge and COVID-19 induced anxiety on three dimensions of protective behaviors towards COVID-19

The results suggest that COVID-19 related knowledge is positively associated with the three dimensions of protective behaviors towards COVID-19. However, interestingly, the COVID-19 induced anxiety was negatively linked to the dimension of post-exposure risky behaviors (PRB) and positively to routine protective behaviors (RPB) and post-exposure protective behaviors (PPB).

4 Discussion

The primary objective of this work was to develop psychometrically sound scales to assess COVID-19 induced anxiety (CIAS), protective behaviors towards COVID-19 (PBCS) and COVID-19 related knowledge. The results indicated that COVID-19 induced anxiety level can be adequately measured by the 6-item version of the CIAS. Communicable diseases outbreaks represent specific health-related crises that may impact people’s emotions in different patterns according to their emerging nature, therefore, the CIAS was designed to cover the potential anxiety sources for general population during COVID-19 outbreak. The CIAS assesses anxiety from specific sources including going outside of the house, disease-related stigma, contracting with people from outbreak areas, getting suspicious clinical symptoms, updates of outbreak data, and resultant death, therefore, it represents a useful tool in measuring level of anxiety specifically related to COVID-19. Interpersonal anxiety-transfer (transmission of anxiety from one person to another) may aggravate during communicable diseases outbreaks through the object-directed social appraisal theory which states that the person becomes significantly influenced by the information picked up from other person’s anxiety expression.³⁴

The PBCS can also estimate adequately people’s protective behaviors towards COVID-19 from three aspects: routine protective behaviors (RPB), post-exposure protective behaviors (PPB) and post-exposure risk behaviors (PRB). During the outbreak, any recommended public health measures for individual protection suggested by official health authorities need to be widely perceived and adopted in a timely manner, therefore regular hand-washing, social distancing practice, and face-masks wearing while in public were considered as the RPB of interest in this scale. In contrast to the PPB which include self-isolation and informing local health authorities after coming from abroad, doing home-quarantine and seeking medical advice as soon as suspicious symptoms arise, and reporting neighboring suspicious and confirmed cases, the PRB are about resisting health recommendations by concealing medical history and taking medications without medical advice.

Based on the hierarchical regression model, gender can explain the variation of the protective behaviors while the academic level cannot explain the behaviors. This finding is supported by the t-test which indicated that compared to females, males have lower level of protective behaviors towards COVID-19. Although this finding warrants further corroboration due to the unbalanced and selective nature of this study sample.

Our SEM model implied that an individual’s COVID-19 related knowledge predicts three dimensions of protective behaviors (RPB, PPB and PRB) in a positive linear way. However, for the level of COVID-19 induced anxiety, it only augurs RPB and PPB by positive linear relationship while it is negatively associated with PRB. The gender differences in protective behaviors are consistent with the previous findings which suggested that compared to females, males are more inclined towards risky behaviors for many specific events because females usually perceive more negative possible outcomes than males.^35,36

The deduction that the level of knowledge towards COVID-19 increases the protective behaviors is consistent with behavioral predictions whereby specific knowledge helps an individual to perform more beneficial behaviors on the knowledge related event. The Health Belief Model argues that individual’s cognitive aspects of health belief, including risk perception and knowledge, can impact the health-related behaviors.³⁷ Generally, more comprehensive, and accurate knowledge is linked to more health promoting behaviors. For example, among the elderly population, there is a significant positive correlation between knowledge about Alzheimer’s symptoms and seeking behaviors for professional help.³⁸ In college adults, knowledge about AIDS enhances the HIV prevention behaviors.³⁹ For schoolchildren, the awareness of the importance of physical exercise promotes their engagement in sport activities.⁴⁰

The interesting phenomenon that the level of COVID-19 induced anxiety not only raises the possibility of routine protective behaviors and post-exposure behaviors, but also enhances the potential post-exposure risky behaviors underscores the complexity with which anxiety impacts behavior. On the one hand, some research indicated that anxiety causes the risk-avoidant decisions and behaviors.^41,42 The reason behind the decision style can be explained by the theory that anxiety implies the potential threat and so helps people to perceive lower vulnerability to the threat.^43,44 However, on the other hand, anxiety can have a negative effect, as it could accumulate and make one prone to risk-taking behaviors, especially under circumstances where an individual displays emotion regulation deficits.^45–47

In conclusion, this study developed and provided initial validation for scales assessing induced anxiety CIAS, protective behavior PBCS, and related knowledge CRKS. These instruments can be rapidly adopted for other communicable diseases during early phase of pandemic outbreaks. Knowledge is a facilitator for protective behaviors, while severe anxiety can be an indicator for risk behaviors during the early phases of outbreak. Therefore, public health strategies need to transmit timely evidence-based health information to the public and to monitor community anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms.

5 Limitations

First, the participants in the sample were mostly from China and most of them were female. The cultural differences in COVID-19 protective behaviors remain unclear and future studies should evaluate whether the associations among protective behaviors, anxiety and knowledge are stable across gender and cultural contexts.

Second, the knowledge scale was only designed based on professional medical education framework but without explicit psychometric analysis testing if (such as IRT test). Establishing a scales validity is an ongoing process and continues work should ensue to cross-validate the scale in independent samples.

Third, it may be desirable, in addition to assessing actual knowledge, to assess perceived knowledge (e.g., as per Health Belief Model) to evaluate its impact on individual’s protective behaviors towards COVID-19 as well.

Given the limited sample size, future research should continue to evaluate psychometric properties of the scales in more representative samples and further probe the associations among protective behaviors, anxiety and knowledge (actual and perceived).

6 Practice Implications

(1) The 6-item version of CIAS and the 14-item version of PBCS are promising tools that can be rapidly adopted to evaluate communicable diseases induced anxiety and protective behaviors during early phase of pandemic outbreaks.

(2) Knowledge is a key indicator for protective behaviors during early phase of the outbreak, therefore public health strategies need to transmit timely evidence-based health information to the public while also highlighting misconceptions circulated by unverified resources.

(3) Severe anxiety in response to communicable diseases outbreak should be monitored as it may lead to risk behaviors which can affect adversely individual’s own health or disease outcomes. Therefore, public health strategies need to monitor community anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms.⁴⁸

8 Authors Contributions

The first two authors (RIAD A, and HUANG Y) contributed to this work equally. The third author (ZHENG L) contributed to design of the work, while the fourth author (ELAVSKY S) contributed to interpretation of the findings.

9 Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.