Abstract
Objective To study the source, symptoms, and duration of infection, preventive measures, contact tracing and their effects on SARS-CoV-2 epidemic among healthcare workers (HCW) in 2 large hospitals and 40 external healthcare services in Milan (Italy) to propose effective measures to control the COVID-19 epidemic among healthcare workers.
Design Epidemiological observational study.
Setting Two large hospitals and 40 territorial healthcare units, with a total of 5700 workers.
Participants 143 HCWs with a SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal (NF) swab in a population made of 5,700 HCWs.
Main outcome measures Clinical data on the history of exposure, contacts inside and outside of the hospital, NF swab dates and results. A daily online self-reported case report form consisting of the morning and evening body temperature and 11 other symptoms (cough, dyspnoea, discomfort, muscle pain, headache, sore throat, vomiting, diarrhoea, anosmia, dysgeusia, conjunctival hyperaemia).
Results Most workers were tested and found positive due to a close contact with a positive colleague (49%), followed by worker-initiated testing due to symptoms (and unknown contact, 28%), and a SARS-CoV-2 positive member of the family (9.8%). 10% of NF swabs performed in the framework of contact tracing resulted positive, compared to only 2.6% through random testing. The first (index) case caused a cluster of 7 positive HCWs discovered through contact tracing and testing of 250 asymptomatic HCWs. HCWs rarely reported symptoms of a respiratory infection, and up to 90% were asymptomatic or with mild symptoms in the days surrounding the positive NF swab. During the 15-day follow-up period, up to 40% of HCWs reported anosmia and dysgeusia/ageusia as moderate or heavy, more frequently than any other symptom. The time necessary for 95% of HCWs to be considered cured (between the positive and two negative NF swabs) was 30 days.
Conclusion HCWs represent the main source of infection in healthcare institutions, 90% are asymptomatic or with symptoms not common in a respiratory infection. The time needed to overcome the infection in 95% of workers was 30 days. Contact tracing allows identifying asymptomatic workers which would spread SARS-CoV-2 in the hospital and is a more successful strategy than random testing.
What is already known on this topic?There are more than 3 million SARS-CoV-2 positive cases and more than 200,000 deaths attributed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) worldwide.
Commonly reported symptoms of COVID-19 include fever, cough, dyspnea, sore throat, muscle pain, discomfort, and many prevention strategies are based on identifying these symptoms of infection.
The virus can be spread even by asymptomatic patients or patients with mild symptoms, and healthcare workers (HCWs) represent 10% of overall cases and often more than 10% of hospital personnel are commonly infected.
HCWs represent both a vulnerable population and an irreplaceable resource in the fight against this epidemic and further analysis is needed to show how and why they get infected and introduce successful prevention measures.
What this study adds?The first (index) case in our study was infected by a family member, but due to close contacts with colleagues managed to infect other 7 HCWs. Contrary to a common expectation that HCWs get infected from patients, they regularly get infected by other HCWs.
Up to 90% of HCWs were asymptomatic or had only mild symptoms. Random testing for SARS-CoV-2 was not efficient. Active search for suspect cases through contact tracing is the strategy of choice to identify most of the positive HCWs.
Most HCWs remained asymptomatic during the 15-day follow-up period, and even in the days prior to the positive NF swab. Anosmia and ageusia/dysgeusia were reported more commonly than classic symptoms of a respiratory infection.
Contrary to the recommended quarantine of 14 days, 30 days were necessary for 95% of the workers to be declared cured (two negative NF swabs)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding. All Authors are employed in the Institution (see affiliation) where the study was conducted.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is still being updated and elaborated and is currently not available.
