Abstract
Background Data for frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) and their risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are limited and whether personal protective equipment (PPE) mitigates this risk is unknown. We evaluated the magnitude of risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among frontline HCWs compared to the general community and the influence of PPE.
Methods We performed a prospective cohort study of the general community, including frontline HCWs, who reported information through the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application beginning on March 24, 2020 (United Kingdom, U.K.) and March 29, 2020 (United States, U.S.) through April 23, 2020. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of a positive COVID-19 test.
Findings Among 2,035,395 community individuals and 99,795 frontline HCWs, we documented 5,545 incident reports of a positive COVID-19 test over 34,435,273 person-days. Compared to the general community, frontline HCWs had an aHR of 11·6 (95% CI: 10·9 to 12·3) for reporting a positive test. The aHRs appeared greater in the U.K. (aHR 12·5, 95% CI: 11·7 to 13·2) compared to the U.S. (aHR 2·80, 95% CI: 2·09 to 3·75; pdifference<0·0001). Frontline HCWs endorsing inadequate PPE availability had a 26% increased risk of testing positive (aHR 1·26, 95% CI: 1·06 to 1·50). Compared to HCWs reporting adequate PPE who did not care for COVID-19 patients, HCWs caring for patients with documented COVID-19 had aHRs for a positive test of 4·95 (95% CI: 4·14 to 5·92) if they had adequate PPE and 6·06 (95% CI: 4·65–7·88) if they had inadequate PPE.
Interpretation Frontline HCWs had a significantly increased risk of COVID-19 infection, which was highest among HCWs with inadequate access to PPE who cared for COVID-19 patients. However, adequate supplies of PPE did not completely mitigate high-risk exposures.
Funding Zoe Global Ltd., Wellcome Trust, EPSRC, NIHR, Alzheimer’s Society, NIH, NIOSH, Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
Evidence before this study The prolonged course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, coupled with sustained challenges supplying adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers (HCW), have strained global healthcare systems in an unprecedented fashion. Despite growing awareness of this problem, there are few data to inform policy makers on the risk of COVID-19 among HCW and the impact of PPE on their disease burden. Based on a PubMed search for articles published between January 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020 using the terms “covid-19”, “healthcare workers”, and “personal protective equipment,” there are no population-scale investigations exploring this topic.
Added value of this study In a prospective study of 2,135,190 individuals, frontline HCWs had a 12-fold increased risk of reporting a positive COVID-19 test. Compared to those who reported adequate availability of PPE, frontline HCWs with inadequate PPE had a 26% increase in risk. However, adequate supplies of PPE did not completely reduce risk among HCWs caring for COVID-19 patients.
Implications of all the available evidence Beyond ensuring adequate supplies of PPE, additional efforts to protect HCWs from COVID-19 are needed, particularly as lockdown is lifted in many regions of the world.
Competing Interest Statement
JW, RD, and JC are employees of Zoe Global Ltd. TDS is a consultant to Zoe Global Ltd. DAD and ATC previously served as investigators on a clinical trial of diet and lifestyle using a separate mobile application that was supported by Zoe Global Ltd. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Clinical Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04331509
Funding Statement
Zoe provided in kind support for all aspects of building, running and supporting the tracking app and service to all users worldwide. Kings College of London investigators (KAL, MNL, TV, MG, CHS, MJC, SO, CJS, TDS) were supported by the Wellcome Trust and EPSRC (WT212904/Z/18/Z, WT203148/Z/16/Z, T213038/Z/18/Z), the NIHR GSTT/KCL Biomedical Research Centre, MRC/BHF (MR/M016560/1), and the Alzheimers Society (AS-JF-17-011). ATC is the Stuart and Suzanne Steele MGH Research Scholar and Stand Up to Cancer scientist. The National Institutes of Health grants related to this project include: UM1 CA186107 (MJS), U01 CA176726 (AHE, WCW), U01 CA167552 (WCW, LAM), U01 HL145386 (JEC), R24 ES028521 (JEC), P30ES000002 (JEH), and a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health grant contract 200-2017-M-94186 (JEC). An Evergrande COVID-19 Response Fund Award through the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MassCPR) also supported MGH investigators (LHN, DAD, ADJ, CGG, WM, RSM, DRS, CHL, SK, MS, ATC). Sponsors had no role in study design, analysis, and interpretation of data, report writing, and the decision to submit for publication. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data and the final responsibility to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data collected in the app is being shared with other health researchers through the NHS-funded Health Data Research U.K. (HDRUK)/SAIL consortium, housed in the U.K. Secure Research Platform (UKSeRP) in Swansea. Anonymized data is available to be shared with bonafide researchers HDRUK according to their protocols in the public interest (https://healthdatagateway.org/detail/9b604483-9cdc-41b2-b82c-14ee3dd705f6). U.S. investigators are encouraged to coordinate data requests through the COPE Consortium (www.monganinstitute.org/cope-consortium). Data updates can be found on https://covid.joinzoe.com.
