“Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study”

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (abbreviated “COVID-19”) is an infectious disease with unknown aetiology characterised with acute pneumonia that has been recognized in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Predominantly, it is characterised by fever, fatigue, and dry cough. Approximately, 20.0% of COVID-19 patients developed to the severe stage, which is characterised by acute respiratory distress syndrome, bleeding, and coagulation dysfunction (1). In the Middle East region, this virus has appeared in some countries before others. For example, it has been firstly identified in Iran then spread in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan. The spread of the virus in Kuwait earlier than others could be attributed to the fact that there was a national holiday in Kuwait in the period between the 23^rd to the 29^th of February, where most people used to spend it abroad. As people returned from vacations, confirmed cases with COVID-19 started to raise. In March 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the COVID-19 outbreak is a pandemic (2). The pandemic lingers to take a hefty toll on healthcare professionals, families, communities and the whole world. In response to that, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and neighbouring Kuwait took drastic measures early on in a bid to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, which includes halting air travels, imposing curfews, and quarantining and testing thousands of individuals (3, 4).

Once a new pandemic starts, the focus of research and action within the medical and public health communities is chiefly and rightly directed towards the identification of the cause, clinical presentation, diagnosis as well as treatment (5). Few studies will address the epidemiology of the disease, the effectiveness of preventive measures, and the population psycho-behavioural directions. Nevertheless, addressing public health preventive measures deserve equal attention. Although there are several ongoing clinical trials assessing potential vaccines and treatments for COVID-19, currently there is no specific treatment that can combat the virus within medical practice. Therefore, public health measures are of crucial value. Such measures mandate the public to be aware of transmission means and have safe preventive practices (6). In this regard, people had concerns about the safety measures to be taken in order to protect themselves and their families from being infected. Generally, the spread of any infectious disease is associated with a high level of fear among the population (7). A particular concern in this regard is the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 on social media sites (8). Universal data collection and analysis of pandemic control hardly contains information about the knowledge and practices of the population regarding the disease and their significance (9, 10). To guarantee the best control over the transmission of the disease, community’s adherence to important control measures are vital, which is affected to large extent by their knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 (9, 10).

Public practices that are built on knowledge ought to be evaluated during pandemics as it will enable policymakers to unravel generic issues from culture specific concerns and then communicate the best practices that appear to have an impact in successfully controlling the outbreak across different communities (11, 12). Thus there is an urgent need to understand what people knows about COVID-19, and which misperceptions they hold about this condition, in order to help healthcare authorities and the media to design effective information campaigns, to know which group of people should be targeted, and to help controlling the spread of the virus among population. Therefore, this study aims to assess the knowledge and practices of Middle Eastern population towards COVID-19 during its rapid rise period.

Methods

Results

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that assesses the knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 among the Arabic speaking Middle Eastern countries. The results revealed that participants are still embracing misconceptions about COVID-19, resulting in an insufficient practice of protective measures against COVID-19 infection. However, some of those individuals who did not adhere to protective measures could be the one who were in duties that necessitate being in a crowded places such as port employees and working in the healthcare sector. The findings of this study revealed that the overall knowledge score among the three countries was around 66.1% (score 7.93 out of 12) with the highest was among Jordanians with a mean score of (8.44 (±1.46); 70.3%) indicate an average level of knowledge about the pandemic. Among the three countries, the participants achieved the lowest knowledge score in the “transmission routes” sub-scale with a score of 43.3%. Whereas the highest knowledge score was recorded on the “preventive and control measures” sub-scale with a score of 83.0%. Overall, the total knowledge score (66.1%) was moderate, which was unexpected as this epidemiological survey was conducted during the advanced stage of the pandemic.

Although the low percentage 15.3% (183/1,194) with regard to the reported practices of attending crowded places were encouraging, only 50.1% (605/1,195) of participants declared that they wore masks when leaving home. The World Health Organization (WHO) during Feb 2020 indicated that there is a priority for research to focus on actions that can save lives now which included “Optimise use of protective equipment and other infection prevention and control measures in health care and community settings – It is critical to protect health care workers and the community from the transmission and create a safe working environment” (10). The needs to avoid the crowd and wear masks upon leaving the house are key practices and top priority of the WHO. A similar study conducted by Zhong et.al. (2020) in China (1), showed that knowledge score was 90.0% and citizens were compliant with protective measures, where 96.4% avoided crowded places and 98.0% wore masks upon departing their homes during COVID-19 outbreak (1). These results undoubtedly revealed that there were significant gaps in the public knowledge about COVID-19 within the Arabic speaking Middle Eastern countries and hence suggest the need for improving individuals’ COVID-19 knowledge via health education, which may cause improvements in their practices towards COVID-19 (1).

Although the situation of the pandemic is severe and the news reports on this public health emergency through various channels of information and via hotlines of the Ministries of Health, a lot of people learn about this infectious disease from invalid social media resources such as WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, etc. This has also been mentioned by Gelsetzer (2020) (15), where it has been noticed that a substantial proportion of people in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) believe in the “myth busters” who continue to circulate inaccurate information about COVID-19. Such information included that rinsing nose with saline, using a hand dryer, taking antibiotics, and gargling mouthwash could be effective preventive measures against COVID-19, and that receiving a letter or package from China may pose a risk of Covid-19 infection. Other unreliable beliefs of the general public in both the US and the UK about COVID-19 were that it is a fatal disease and that children are at high risk of death from it. Another disbelief was that medical masks are highly effective in protecting from catching a COVID-19 infection (15). However, people in the Middle East region have reported some similar beliefs and other different. For example, in the current study, most participant (66.9%) reported that it is unnecessary for children and younger adults to take preventive measures against COVID-19. Thus, in contrast to people in the US and UK, people in the Middle East believe that children and younger adults are at lower risk of COVID-19 infection. On the other hand, most people (57.0%) in the Middle East shared similar beliefs regarding wearing medical masks to prevent them from COVID-19 infection. Regarding the fatality feature of COVID-19, Middle East participants reported conflicting beliefs to people in the US and UK, as the majority (89.0%) believe that although there is no effective treatment, supportive measurements and symptoms alleviation can cure the infection.

Unfortunately, the present study showed that 15.3% of participants still go to crowded places and around 50.0% do not wear masks when leaving homes recently. However, not wearing a mask when leaving home could be related to that most of the participants (84.7%) were very cautious and avoided crowded places. This strict preventive practice from the participants could be primarily attributed to the very strict prevention and control measures implemented by local governments such as traffic limits all throughout the countries and the shutdown of shopping malls and work in all sectors except the health sector. Second, this could be due to the population fear of the virus and its high infectivity. In China, although a study by Zhong et al. (2020) was conducted during the very early stage of the pandemic, people achieved a correct rate of 90.0% on COVID-19 knowledge questionnaire (1). In addition, the population’s adherence to the preventive and control measures was higher than in the Middle East, where almost all people stayed home during the virus outbreak period, and wear masks when leaving homes. This could be attributed to the more serious situation of the COVID-19 pandemic in China, where higher rates of death were recorded, resulting in higher beliefs and adherence to preventive measures.

Further analysis of the findings was directed towards determining demographic factors associated with knowledge gaps among participants. Such findings will be valuable for public-health policymakers and healthcare professionals to recognize target populations for health education activities on the COVID-19 outbreak. This is critical as the countries involved in the study are still at the beginning of the outbreak and governments took extreme measures to contain the pandemic. But such measures, which include imposing a curfew, are virtually useless unless were accompanied by responsible individuals’ preventative practices (3). In this study as well as in previous studies in China, US, and UK, an association has been noticed between particular demographic characteristics and knowledge, beliefs, and practices towards COVID-19 (1, 15). For example, in China, an association between non-adherence to preventive and control measures and male gender, occupation of “students”, marital status of “others”, residing in other parts of China, and poor COVID-19 knowledge has been reported (1). Those findings were supported by previous studies regarding age and gender patterns of risk-taking behaviours (16, 17). In the US and UK, Geldsetzer (2020) has reported lower fatality rates due to COVID-19 infection among individuals of East-Asian ethnicity and children (15). In the current study, there was a significant difference between knowledge scores in the three countries included in the analyses, and the highest knowledge score among the participants has been found in Jordan. Both males and females showed similar levels of knowledge about COVID-19.

Higher COVID-19 knowledge scores were found to be significantly associated with age and educational attainment, which is in line with the study conducted in China during the COVID-19 pandemic (1). Older individuals above the age of 29 years showed a significant increase in knowledge scores than younger ones. Similarly, an appreciable increase in knowledge score with the increase in education level was noted. This could suggest that the contents and forms of health-related information about the pandemic could not be understandable and acceptable to young adults and the less educated individuals (12). Our findings are consistent with several previously published studies that related age and the level of education with knowledge and awareness about outbreaks (18, 19). Furthermore, several studies reported that the lack of knowledge contributed to the emergence and spread of the outbreak. Therefore, providing targeted health education programs to raise awareness is vital. Such programs need to be tailored to young individuals and particularly those with lower education levels (19-21).

Furthermore, a significant negative effect on the knowledge score was the employment status, specifically among students (p<0.05). The results are aligned to the finding that lack of knowledge is related to young people (18 – 29 years). Such findings are alarming, as the lack of knowledge about COVID-19 is correlated with a higher prevalence rate of the infection (1, 22). Therefore, there is a need for improving students’ knowledge about COVID-19 by means of health education, which may also result in improvements in their practices towards COVID-19. Such results could support the decision made by many countries including Jordan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia in taking a political commitment to temporally close all educational institutions to contain the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Globally, the action involved 188 countries, affecting around 1.5 billion learners. The mode of teaching moved into emergency remote learning (22, 23). Yet, although the closure of schools and educational facilities is a good mean to prevent young adults from mixing with others, it will not prevent exposure even with curfew laws. Young adults will always go out and get exposed to the risk of getting infected as the level of knowledge is low. A recent study on COVID-19 concluded that educational institutions closures alone would preclude only 2–4% of deaths, which is a lot less than other social distancing interventions. The integration of additional social distancing strategies along with educational institutions closures needs to be considered (24). Furthermore, the results of our study pertinent to knowledge scores stratification according to demographics are in line with studies on COVID-19 in China and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks among others (1, 25). These findings also proposed that health education strategies would be more effective if it was designed to targets certain demographic groups, such as university students.

Good knowledge is vital to enable individuals to have better practices in pandemics and outbreaks. A study on SARS demonstrated that a higher knowledge score was found to be connected with improved adherence to precautionary practices (11, 26). Of interest, an income of ≥1,409 $ (p<0.05) had a significant negative association with the knowledge score in our cohort, showing that high income does not improve knowledge and practices. However, this is contrary to a previous study on the influenza pandemic, where there was no association between knowledge and income (26). A possible reason for such result is that the higher income of individuals is accompanied with low education level. The current study showed that knowledge scores significantly differed across marital status categories (P<0.002), divorced participants had a significant negative association with COVID-19 knowledge score (p<0.01). Our findings were in line with the results obtained from the study on COVID-19 in China, which revealed a statistically significant difference in knowledge score according to marital status, however, they found that the category denotes as others (included divorced and widowed, separated, remarried) showing the highest score in knowledge (11.0 out of 12.0) (91.7%), P <0.001) (1). This difference could be justified by two elements. Firstly, different countries might have different cultural dimension and hence results could not be compared. Secondly, the group used in the Chinese study included all divorced, separated, widowed and remarried individuals and hence we could not build a good correlation (1).

Overall, knowledge scores within our cohort were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of dangerous practices towards COVID-19 pandemic. Such findings indicate the presence of knowledge gap and the need to improve individuals’ COVID-19 knowledge via extensive health education strategies. Such strategies are to be tailored and targeted towards specific demographic groups particularly, university students, individuals with low education, higher income and divorced.

Conclusion

Findings of this study suggest that Middle Eastern participants are of a relatively low level of knowledge about COVID-19, particularly regarding its transmission routes. The majority of the population showed appropriate practice by avoiding crowded places and staying home during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak. However, not wearing a mask when leaving home was predominant. As good COVID-19 knowledge is associated with optimistic attitudes and appropriate practices towards COVID-19, policymakers are in a position to develop targeted in information campaigns provided to targeted population specifically university students, unemployed individuals and those with lower levels of education. This information could be conveyed to people by clinicians to their patients, and news coverage supplied by the media and social media platforms.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author contributions

AN conceived the study, wrote the methods, conducted the formal analysis, and coordinated the study. AN, EZD, ZA, and AA drafted the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.