An experimental trial of recombinant human interferon alpha nasal drops to prevent COVID-19 in medical staff in an epidemic area

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) initially reported in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China in December 2019 and January 2020. It is a severe respiratory disease associated with high mortality in critical cases ^{[1, 2]}. As of April 15, 2020, there have been more than 1.9 million individuals affected and nearly 12300 deaths over the world ^[3]. Before government intervention and medical assistance from other provinces of China, health care workers in Wuhan and some other cities in Hubei province faced overwhelming work intensity and high risk of nosocomial infection, accounting for 90% infected medical staff in our country ^{[4, 5]}.

SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted through the respiratory tract and direct contact. Air and contact isolation are pivotal to reduce the spread of the virus, COVID-19 patients and those infected with SARS-CoV-2 should be isolated in single-room, with constant air circulation, and disinfection of the air and environmental items ^[6]. A mask (N95) can block 95% of the virus from entering the respiratory tract. Strict implementation of hand hygiene can prevent contact transmission. Due to the intense outbreak of COVID-19 over a short period in early Hubei, especially in Wuhan, the isolated wards of medical institutions are unable to accommodate the admission of a large number of patients. Many ordinary wards have been temporarily converted into isolated wards, which fail to meet the “two-zone, three-passage” standard. Furthermore, in the early stage of the epidemic, protective supplies such as N95 masks were scarce, a part of medical staff lacked awareness of self-protection, failed to standardize mask-wearing and hand hygiene, leading to a large number of infections among medical staff. Therefore, it is urgent to assure occupational safety and health in medical staff during early stage of disease transmission, when there was neither effective drug nor vaccine.

Medical personnel, especially front-line medical staff involved in fever clinics and isolation wards, have long been engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. Consequently, they have been at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for a long time. Even if the standard second-level protections, such as a disposable round cap, gown, protective clothing, N95 mask and surgical mask, and double gloves, are implemented and enhanced second-level protections (e.g., the use of a protective screen or positive pressure breathing mask during airway operations) are put into use when necessary, these measures do not completely protect people from infection with SARS-CoV-2.

In cases of SARS-CoV-2 invasion of the mouth and nose, immune intervention strategies to increase the local or systemic immunity may build up the body’s resistance to the virus and cover the shortage of physical protection. Interferon (IFN) is by far the most widely used antiviral biological drug discovered in 1957 ^[7]. It is an important cytokine that regulates cell functions and block virus particles replication, and has effect on both DNA and RNA viruses, it may reduce the amount of virus, lead to restriction and even clearance of the virus. For general viral infection, IFN can shorten the course of the disease ^[8]. Moreover, IFN nasal drops maintain a high IFN-α concentration in the nasal mucosa, which can inhibit virus accumulated in the nasal mucosal epithelium and prevent from break through the mucosal immune barrier. According to the latest results from the P4 laboratory of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, China, SARS-CoV-2 can reduce the ability of host cells to suppress viruses by reducing endogenous IFN production. Therefore, the use of exogenous IFN in early stage may be important.

A trial on the preventive effect of recombinant human IFN-α nasal drops against COVID-19 in medical staff has been carried out, and the results will be presented in the present study.

Methods

Results

Discussion

This study preliminarily explores the preventive effect of rhIFN-α nasal drops against SARS-CoV-2 infection in medical staff over a period of 28 days. The study shows that if standard first- and second-level protections are strictly implemented, the use of IFN-α nasal drops may effectively prevent medical staff at low exposure level (i.e., those not directly exposed to COVID-19) from COVID-19 pneumonia. In addition, IFN-α nasal drops combined with weekly thymosin-α1 subcutaneous injection may help to prevent medical staff at high exposure level (i.e., those who are in direct contact with COVID-19 patients) from developing the disease.

COVID-19 is highly contagious and presents a long-lasting epidemic trend. COVID-19 has now progressively expanded to more than 200 countries and the global pandemic trend is apparent ^[10]. At the beginning of transmission, health care workers were vulnerable populations with substantially high risk of nosocomial infection. Recently, a large number of medical staff infection in Italy and other countries have also been reported ^{[11, 12]}. In addition, the study suggests that compared to those who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 before January 23, recently infected patients displayed more subtle symptoms, while the infectivity has not changed significantly, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 tends to gradually evolve into a low-virulence, highly infectious influenza-like virus ^[13]. Therefore, experts predict that epidemics of the virus SARS-CoV-2 may recur every autumn and winter, and the virus will coexist with human beings for a long time. For this reason, clinicians and public health scholars currently believe that a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that inhibits coronavirus is essential to prevent recurrent epidemics and mutations both before and after a vaccine.

The keys to preventing and controlling COVID-19 are controlling the source of infection, cutting off the route of transmission, and protecting susceptible populations ^[14]. In accordance with China’s “Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (Fifth Edition)”, medical personnel working in outpatient departments with suspected or confirmed patients in the ward are equipped with second-level protection for the general diagnosis and treatment of patients. Medical staff involved in the treatment of suspected or confirmed patients using aerosol-generating procedures (such as tracheal intubation and related operations, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, bronchoscopy, sputum suction, throat swab sampling and the use of high-speed equipment (such as drilling, sawing, centrifuging, etc.), should use third-level protection. Medical staff in general wards should implement first-level protection and strictly follow standard hand hygiene procedures. Hand hygiene should be performed before putting on gloves and after removing gloves. Taihe Hospital in Shiyan City and other hospitals in Hubei Province have all followed the above-described prevention and control plan throughout the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. In addition to following these standard protections, the medical staff of Taihe Hospital in Shiyan City were given IFN-α nasal drops with or without subcutaneous thymosin-α1 according to their degree of exposure to COVID-19. Among the medical staff treated with this protocol, there were no COVID-19 cases reported over a 28-day observation period. In contrast, over the same period, over 100 cases of COVID-19 were confirmed among medical staff at more than 10 other hospitals in Hubei Province. The results suggest that IFN-α nasal drops, especially in combination with thymosin-α1, may improve the protection of medical staff against COVID-19 and are an effective supplement to physical protections.

Vaccines and prophylactic drugs are the two main approaches for protecting susceptible populations. Although many clinical trials of vaccines against COVID-19 have been launched, whether they are safe and can trigger immune responses is uncertain ^{[15, 16]}. They might come too late to affect the first wave of this pandemic. Additionally, the existence of two subtypes of SARS-CoV-2 (the L and S subtypes) has been confirmed, and the possibility of new mutations cannot be ruled out ^[17]. Therefore, experts have raised concerns about whether vaccines developed for early viral RNA sequences will be able to effectively protect against mutant viruses. Thus, there is an urgent need for drugs that can effectively prevent coronavirus infection in healthy people before a vaccine becomes available on the market and after the subsequent decline in the protection capability of early vaccines due to virus mutation.

IFN is a type of cytokine produced when a cell is stimulated by a viral infection or other IFN-inducing agent. It is a secreted protein (mainly a glycoprotein) that has many biological functions, including the regulation of innate and acquired immune responses after infection, in addition to a broad spectrum of antiviral, immune-regulating biological functions. IFN is divided into three types: I, II and III. Type I includes IFN-α and IFN-β; type II has only one subtype, IFN-γ; and type III includes IFN-λ 1 (IL-29), IFN-λ 2 (IL-28a), and IFN-λ (IL-28b). At present, the α subtype of type I IFN is generally used for the development of antiviral drugs because of its strong inhibition of viral replication. According to its amino acid sequence, IFN-α has more than 20 subtypes. Common IFN-αs that have been developed and marketed for antiviral therapy are IFN-α 1b, IFN-α 2b, IFN-α 2a, and IFN-ω. The antiviral mechanism of IFN is implemented by activating cell membrane adenylate cyclase on cell surface receptors while promoting the increase of adenylate cyclase, which activates the intracellular antiviral mechanism so that a group of antiviral substances, including anti-viral proteins and enzymes, can be generated. The generation of these substances has the effect of inhibiting virus replication and blocking virus spread.

Clinically, IFN-α has been used for a long time to prevent and treat the common cold and flu, especially in the early stage of epidemic. IFN-α is effective not only for preventing infection with influenza viruses, rhinoviruses but also coronaviruses in susceptible people ^[18]. Since the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, the efficacy of IFN-α has attracted researchers’ attention. An in vitro test confirmed the efficacy of IFN-α against SARS-like coronavirus infection ^[19]. Animal tests have confirmed that IFN-α nasal spray can effectively prevent or reduce coronavirus infection-related damage in monkeys ^{[20, 21]}. In addition, a clinical study indicated that rhIFN-α 2b spray can reduce common respiratory virus infection to varying degrees with well safety in this study of 14,391 healthy people ^[22].

Evidence suggests that each type of IFN may play an important role in host defense and immunopathology, particularly at epithelial barriers. Recently, a study based on scRNA-seq datasets reveals that nasal goblet and ciliated cells highly express ACE2, receptor of SARS-CoV-2 invasion and TMRPSS2 viral entry-associated protease, implicating that these cells are the initial invasion sites and may play as virus reservoir for the disease transmission ^[23]. Another article elaborated that IFN-α2 and IFN-γ drives ACE2 expression dose-dependently in primary human nasal epithelial cells. A dramatic reduction of virus replication after the addition of in vitro type I IFN was observed, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 may inhibit subsequent upregulation of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) ^[24]. Thus, we hypothesis that exogenous addition of type I IFN in nasal epithelial cells may prevent virus invasion and transmission between individuals by creating a high local concentration of IFN, inhibiting virus replication in nasal goblet and ciliate cells, and reducing virus reservation.

Our study began on January 25, and there were no new confirmed cases of COVID-19 among 2944 medical staff members after 28 days of nasal drop intervention. The 2,415 medical staff members without direct exposure to COVID-19 were considered a healthy susceptible population, and the results confirm the effectiveness of IFN-α nasal drops for the prevention of COVID-19 in the general healthy population. The 529 medical staff members working in the isolation ward were also free of infections and confirmed cases, proving that the drug can strengthen the protection of medical staff in the isolation ward. These results indicate that for SARS-CoV-2, which is homologous to the SARS coronavirus, rhIFN-α nasal drops can effectively compensate for the deficiency of the physical barrier and improve the nonspecific antiviral effect against SARS-CoV-2 in susceptible populations, and the mechanisms of this effect are clear. In addition, it can reduce the vulnerability of SARS-CoV-2 resistance. Furthermore, the safety of intranasal IFN-α nasal drops has been effectively evaluated, and no serious adverse reactions or adverse events occurred in the present study.

This clinical study has several characteristics. Firstly, it is the first real-world study of an intervention using IFN-α nasal drops to prevent COVID-19 pneumonia in healthy susceptible people in the COVID-19 epidemic area. Secondly, this study began in the early COVID-19 outbreak in Hubei. Four weeks after the initiate of the study, the number of COVID-19 pneumonia cases in Hubei Province increased rapidly, while there were no new cases of COVID-19 pneumonia among the more than 2,000 participants in our tertiary hospital. This indicates that IFN-α has a promising preventive effect in people who are susceptible to the virus. Furthermore, this study divided the participants into low-risk group and a high-risk susceptibility group, single drug (IFN-α nasal drops) or combination drug (IFN-α nasal drops combined with thymosin-α1 subcutaneous injection) was administered respectively to the two groups with different risks of COVID-19. This provides insights and corresponding evidence related to the adoption of differentiated drug prevention methods for susceptible populations at different exposure levels.

Our study also has limitations. The study was not clustered, randomized designed with the control group from other epidemic area during the same period reported in the literature, rather than a strictly parallel, placebo-controlled group. Nevertheless, our study represents a real-world effort initiated by researchers in an emergent medical situation to prevent and control nosocomial infection in our medical staff. The results lay a good foundation for subsequent high-quality randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled studies. Secondly, SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests and serum antibodies tests were not performed for the subjects in this study, so it was impossible to determine whether IFN-α has prevents infection with SARS-CoV-2; instead, the development of COVID-19 pneumonia was the main evaluation indicator. The main reason for using this outcome was that no COVID-19 diagnostic kits had been approved at the beginning of the study. Subsequent high-quality studies should use combined nucleic acid and serum antibody testing to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.

In summary, in more than 2,000 health care workers at large tertiary hospitals who were at high or low risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in Shiyan City, Hubei Province, a COVID-19 epidemic area, a real-world study of the use of IFN-α nasal drops with or without thymosin-α1 as a 28-day intervention shows that low-risk subjects treated with IFN-α nasal drops alone and high-risk subjects treated with IFN-α nasal drops combined with thymosin-α1 developed zero cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. We explore that rhIFN-α nasal drops can be used as an alternative drug to effectively prevent SARS-CoV-2 virus infection and protect healthy and susceptible people from coronavirus infection. During the COVID-19 epidemic, rhIFN-α nasal drops could play a complementary role along with vaccines. In the future, more large-scale clinical studies can be conducted to further verify the preventive effect of rhIFN-α nasal drops.