Abstract
Malaria vector control may be compromised by resistance to insecticides in vector populations. Actions to mitigate against resistance rely on surveillance using standard susceptibility tests, but there are large gaps in the monitoring data. Using a published geostatistical ensemble model, we have generated maps that bridge these gaps and consider the likelihood that resistance exceeds recommended thresholds. Our results show that this model provides more accurate next-year predictions than two simpler approaches. We have used the model to generate district-level maps for the probability that pyrethroid resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.l. exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) thresholds for susceptibility and confirmed resistance. In addition, we have mapped the three criteria for the deployment of piperonyl butoxide-treated nets that mitigate against the effects of metabolic resistance to pyrethroids. This includes a critical review of the evidence for presence of cytochrome P450-mediated metabolic resistance mechanisms across Africa. The maps for pyrethroid resistance are available on the IR Mapper website where they can be viewed alongside the latest survey data.
Significance Statement Malaria control in Africa largely relies on the use of insecticides to prevent mosquitoes from transmitting the malaria parasite to humans, however, these mosquitoes have evolved resistance to these insecticides. To manage this threat to malaria control, it is vital that we map locations where the prevalence of resistance exceeds thresholds defined by insecticide resistance management plans. A geospatial model and data from Africa are used to predict locations where thresholds of resistance linked to specific recommended actions are exceeded. This model is shown to provide more accurate next-year predictions than two simpler approaches. The model is used to generate maps that aid insecticide resistance management planning and that allow targeted deployment of interventions that counter specific mechanisms of resistance.
Competing Interest Statement
D.K.A. and M.P.H. are employees of Vestergaard Frandsen S.A.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Wellcome Trust Grant 108440/Z/15/Z (to C.L.M.)
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
catherinemoyes{at}gmail.com
Author contributions: C.L.M. and P.A.H designed the research with input from T.S., K.E.B., M.E.S., J.H., M.C.;
C.L.M. and P.A.H. analyzed the data;
D.K.A. and M.P.H. designed the online dissemination tools with input from C.L.M. and P.A.H; C.L.M., D.K.A., T.S., K.E.B., M.E.S., M.H., J.H., M.C. and P.A.H wrote the paper.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.