Abstract
The Nordic Hamstring exercise reduces hamstring strain injuries in football and other sports, but the exercise is not well adopted in practice. Barriers from practitioners include fear of performance decrements, due to lack of specificity of the exercise with high speed running. However, in theory, increased eccentric hamstring strength could transfer to faster sprinting due to higher horizontal force production. Studies on the effect of the Nordic Hamstring exercise on performance have been conflicting and no synthesis of the evidence exists. We therefore pose the following question: does including the Nordic Hamstring exercise hamper sprint or jump performance in athletes? We will answer this question by performing a systematic review of the literature, critically appraise relevant studies, and GRADE the evidence across key outcomes and perform meta-analyses, meta-regression and subgroup analyses. In this protocol we outline the planned methods and procedures.
Progress report Besides this protocol, our data extraction form and the process of data extraction has been piloted on 3 relevant studies, along with familiarization with the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. We have also comprised a preliminary search strategy for PubMed.
Supplementary files
Data Extraction Form (.pdf)
Populated PRISMA-P checklist (.pdf)
Competing Interest Statement
We have no financial interests to declare. Some of the authors (KK, KT, PH, LI) have previously published two trials within the scope of this review, in which the effect in both trials favours the experimental intervention and is thus subjected to confirmation bias and self-citation incentives.
Clinical Trial
PROSPERO ID: CRD42020177468
Funding Statement
No specific funding were given for this study. No funding- or institutional body will have any control or involvement in data collection, analyses, interpretation, writing the report or decision to publish.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Changelog from version 2.0 to 3.0 (05-FEB-2021: screening started, next step is full-text assessments) - Added PROSPERO registration ID. - Added a sensitivity analysis: 'Only studies with other types of strength training as comparator', as this was mistakenly left out in previous drafts. - Removed a sensitivity analysis from table 4: 'Only studies with usual training or no intervention as comparator', as this was in fact our primary analysis and was duplicated in table 4 mistakenly. - Post hoc change: Added further details on the data extraction of grey literature from authors, as we have started this process earlier than anticipated. We are currently doing it before full-text assessments, rather than after data-extraction as anticipated. - Post hoc change: Added details on screening of registry entries that was not possible to import into reference manager and was thus screen in full directly in the registry.
Data Availability
After publication, all data (populated data extraction forms, search files, supplementary analyses, statistical code, bias- and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessments, populated PRISMA checklist) will be shared as supplementary files with no restrictions, either on our institutional website, per journal repository or other open access repository (e.g. figshare.com).
