Clinical characteristics of the recovered COVID-19 patients with re-detectable positive RNA test

Study design and participants

A total of 262 confirmed COVID-19 patients discharged from Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital from January 23, 2020 to February 25, 2020 were enrolled in this study. All discharged COVID-19 patients were continued to be isolated and observed for 14 days, weekly followed-up and SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection were performed timely. All discharged patients were followed-up for at least two additional weeks after isolation. Among them, the RP patients were re-admitted to hospital for further medical observation and close contacts were also followed-up. The rest of the recovered NRP patients were closely followed-up outside the hospital. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen (2020-115), which waived the requirement for written patient consent for this retrospective analysis. All patients gave their oral consent to participate in this retrospective study.

Clinical definition

According to the guideline of the diagnosis and treatment for novel coronavirus pneumonia (the sixth edition) published by National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China [13], all first diagnosis cases of COVID-19 were confirmed according to positive respiratory RT-PCR tests. The discharge criteria of the recovered patients included: temperature returned to normal for more than 3 days, respiratory symptoms significantly improved, and significant absorption of pulmonary lesions of chest CT imaging, and at least consecutive negative RNA test results for 2 apart from each other by at least 24 hours. The RP patients were confirmed by digestive (anal swab) and respiratory positive RT-PCR tests. Since February 22, 2020, evaluation of negative anal swab was supplemented for discharge criteria in Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital.

Data collection

The medical records of 262 recovered COVID 19 patients including 38 RP patients were reviewed. The epidemiological, demographic, clinical, laboratory data of the patients were collected, summarized and analyzed. According to the first chest CT imaging post admission, the extent of pulmonary inflammation was divided into mild, moderate and severe condition basing on the lesions involving unilateral lobe, multiple lobes in both lungs, and all lobes in both lungs, respectively. According to chest CT within 7 days after admission, the remission of the lesions was evaluated. The temporary progression was indicated by increased lesion and persistent remission was indicated by stable or absorbed or decreased lesions.

qRT-PCR and Sherlock assay for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection

The quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was assessed as described previously [14]. Nasopharyngeal and anal specimens collected during hospitalization were sent to the laboratory in viral transport case. Total nucleic acid extraction were extracted from the samples using the QIAamp RNA Viral Kit (Qiagen, Heiden, Germany), and quantitative RT-PCR was performed using a China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) approved commercial kit specific for 2019-nCoV detection (GeneoDX Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) or Sherlock kit gifted from Feng Zhang lab according to the manual. Each RT-PCR assay provided a Ct value, which is the number of cycles required for the fluorescent signal to cross the threshold for a positive test, a higher Ct value is correlated with a lower viral load. The specimens were considered positive if the Ct value was ≤ 37.0, and negative if the viral load were undetectable. Specimens with a cycle-threshold value higher than 37 were repeated. The specimen was considered positive if the repeat results were the same as the initial result and between 37 and 40. If the repeat Ct was undetectable, the specimen was considered negative. All procedures involving clinical specimens and SARS-CoV-2 were performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory. Meanwhile, we did next-generation sequencing of samples from three patients.

ELISA assay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibody

Microtiter plates (Sangon Biotech) were coated overnight at 4°C with 4 μg/mL recombinant SARS-CoV-2-RBD (Receptor binding domain) proteins (50 μL per well) expressed by our laboratory through 293-T cells. The plates were washed thrice with PBS containing 0.1% v/v Tween-20 (PBST) and blocked with blocking solution (PBS containing 2% w/v non-fat dry milk) for 2 hours at 37°C. The plates were then washed with PBST. The sera were diluted to 200-fold into PBS as an initial concentration, and serial 3-fold dilutions of sera was added to the wells and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. After three washes, 100 μL of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (for IgG antibody titer detection) and IgM (for IgM antibody titer detection) antibodies solution (Sangon Biotech) were added to each plate, respectively, and incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes. After five washes, 100 μL of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Sangon Biotech) was added at room temperature in the dark. After 15 minutes, the reaction was stopped with a 2 M H2SO4 solution. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. All samples were run in triplicate. The ELISA titers were determined by endpoint dilution.

Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago). All of the statistical tests were two-sided, and significant differences were considered at p < 0.05. Continuous variables were evaluated using the median and interquartile range (IQR) values. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were utilized to compare the proportions of the categorical variables.

Demographic, epidemiological and clinical characteristics

A total of 262 patients were discharged from January 23, 2020 to February 25, 2020 and were followed-up for at least 14 days. Among them, mild, moderate and severe patients accounted for 11.4% (n = 30), 81.0% (n = 212) and 7.6% (n = 20), respectively. Up to March 10, 14.5% of convalescent patients (n = 38) were re-detected to be SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive during their followed-up period. None of severe patients were re-tested to be RNA positive (Supplemental Table 1).

It revealed that the vast majority of RP patients (97.4%, n = 37) were younger than 60 years of age. Among them, patients younger than 14 years old were more common compared with those between the ages of 14 and 60 years (35.0% vs 16.0%, p < 0.01) (Table 1). In addition, it is found that 36.7% (11/38) of RP patients are characterized by mild symptoms. The percentage was significantly higher than what was seen among NRP patients (12.7%, 19/204, p < 0.01, Supplemental Table 1). There was no significant difference in the gender distribution. Notably, there were less mild RP patients having fever in their initial symptoms as compared to mild NRP patients (p < 0.01). Also, 45.5% of mild RP patients displayed only upper respiratory symptoms at the first admission, while mild NRP patients usually had lower respiratory symptoms at the first admission (Table 1). There is no difference of the extent of lesions in the first chest CT imaging between RP and NRP patients with moderate stages. However, the incidence of RP (85.2%) was found to be particularly closely related to the sustained remission of chest CT imaging as compared to NRP patients, of which 36.2% displayed transient progression during their first hospitalization period (Table 1 and Figure 1). There was no significant difference in the usage of steroid and antiviral therapy between RP and NRP patients during their first hospitalization period. In addition, RP patients did not show a higher incidence of a history of traveling and living in Hubei province as compared to NRP patients.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1 Serial CT imaging of a representative RP and NRP patient.

For the RP patient, the first chest CT scan on admission (day 7 since the onset of illness) showed ground-glass opacity in both lungs. At 3 day, 6 day and 10 day after admission (day 10, day 13 and day 17 since the onset of illness), the lung lesions on the chest CT imaging was significantly reduced accompanied by the disappeared clinical symptoms. The patient was discharged at day 12 after admission (day 19 since the onset of illness). At day 26 (day 33 since the onset of illness), the patient was re-admitted without fever and cough due to positive RNA detection. The chest CT showed no inflammatory lesions. For the NRP patient, a chest CT scan showed a small ground glass in the upper left lung on admission (day 3 since the onset of illness). On day 2 and 8 after admission (day 5 and day 11 since the onset of illness), the double lower lung lesions increased significantly on chest CT imaging although the body temperature and the oxygenation index was returned to normal levels. On day 9, 14 and 17 after admission (day 12, day 17 and day 20 since the onset of illness), the lesions in both lower lungs were recovered on chest CT imaging. Then the patient was discharged without fever and cough at day 18 after admission (day 21 since the onset of illness) when SRAS-CoV-2 RNA was also detected to be negative.

Differential RNA dynamic in RP patients with that in NRP patients

No differences of days of last RNA negative-conversion since the onset of illness and hospitalization days were found between RP and NRP patients. Importantly, RNA negative-conversion occurred mostly within 2-3 weeks since the onset of illness among 63.6% mild RP patients and within 1-2 weeks since the onset of illness among 22.2% moderate RP patients. By contrast, there are more NRP patients who displayed RNA negative-conversion after 3 weeks since the onset of illness regardless of mild or moderate status (Table 2). These data showed RP patients were characterized by early RNA-negative conversion while NRP patients cleared virus relatively late.

The changes of serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibodies in patients recovered from COVID-19

In order to evaluate the effect of serum-specific antibody levels on the occurrence of RP, we analyzed the difference of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM antibody levels in both RP and NRP patients at their discharge. More than half of RP and NRP patients displayed medium levels of IgG and IgM independent on their disease severity. However, there are no differences of antibody levels in between both groups of patients (Supplemental Table 2). We also evaluated the dynamic of IgG and IgM levels at the discharge and re-admission in RP patients. The IgG and IgM levels were maintained at stable levels in these RP patients during the 14 days period (data not shown).

Supplementing negative results of anal swab test at discharge failed to reduce RP occurrence of COVID-19 patients

In order to evaluate the effects of increasing sampling site test at discharge on RP events, we compared the occurrence events of RP before Feb 22 and after Feb 22 after that time the negative anal swab detection was added to discharge criterion in COVID-19 patients. Our results showed that there was no statistical difference in the occurrence of RP patients before Feb 22 and after Feb 22 (14.5% vs 14.3%, p = 0.77, Figure 2). These data indicated that supplementing detected sites of SARS-CoV-2 RNA failed to reduce the RP occurrence in convalescent patients.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2 The number of discharge patients and RP patients each day from Jan 23 to March 10, 2020.

On Feb 22, 2020, the anal swab negative test was added to discharge criterion. Blue, the number of discharge patients. Red, the number of RP patients.

RP patients showed no obvious clinical symptoms and disease progression

All 38 RP patients were re-admitted to the hospital for further medical observation. The analysis showed that all these patients had no fever. A small number of patients reported mild cough and chest tightness, which were not worse than before (Table 3). All patients recovered from mild conditions (n = 30) and 37.0% from moderate patients had normal chest CT imaging without inflammatory signs. By contrast, 63.0% (n = 17) of patients recovered from moderate conditions had stable or reduced inflammatory signs in their chest CT imaging (Figure 1). There were normal range of the lymphocyte count, plasma IL-6 and CRP levels upon admission for all RP patients. Only one patient received transient interferon-alpha inhalation therapy, and 4 patients received low-flow oxygen inhalation therapy and traditional Chinese medicine after admission.

In addition, because all the convalescent patients with COVID-19 in our cohort were required to be isolated at home or under intensive isolation, only 21 close contacts were produced. Up to March 10, 2020, all of 21 close contacts were tested to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and no suspicious clinical symptoms were reported in those close contacts.

Hyper-sensitive methods potentially improved SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in RP patients

To investigate the possible false negative due to low-sensitive commercial RNA detection kit, we used a higher-sensitive method to detect various types of samples from both RP patients and NRP patients with similar illness days. For 24 samples from 15 of RP patients who were sampled after 5-7 days since the onset of the re-admission, 75% of spike genes and 41.6% ORF genes could be detected to be positive using hyper-sensitive method, while only 12.5% N genes and 4.2% RF genes were detected to be positive using commercial detection kit. Eight of fifteen RP patients were confirmed to be RNA positive using the hyper-sensitive kit, although only 1 person was confirmed using commercial kit. By contrasts, 8 samples from NRP patients were detected to be negative by both methods. These data showed hyper-sensitive methods potentially improve RNA positive detection in samples from RP patients with negative results.