Emotional responses and coping strategies of nurses and nursing college students during COVID-19 outbreak

Introduction

On December, 2019, Multiple unexplained cases of pneumonia were reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Epidemiological findings revealed severe human-to-human transmission, which was later confirmed to be caused by a novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) named it Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [1]. Although 13 prefecture-level cities in Hubei, including Wuhan, and one autonomous prefecture have announced closures from January 23, 2020. The Chinese government also announced the extension of the Spring Festival holiday (from 7 days to 14 days), and implemented epidemic prevention and control measures such as suspension of school, shutdown, and closure of business to reduce the concentration of personnel and block the spread of the epidemic. However, due to the large population migration before the Chinese Lunar New Year, more than 5 million residents have reportedly left Wuhan for various cities in China and around the world. Compared with viruses such as SARS and Ebola, COVID-19 is highly infectious during the incubation period, and asymptomatic infection exists. It can be transmitted through respiratory droplets, contact and aerosols [2]. As a result, large-scale infection of COVID-19 has been caused worldwide. As of February 22, 2020, China has reported 51,699 confirmed cases (including Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan, including 10,968 severe cases), a total of 22,888 discharged patients, 2442 deaths, and 76,936 confirmed cases. There were 4148 suspected cases. A total of 628,517 close contacts were tracked, and 106,089 close contacts were still in medical observation. A total of 1,719 confirmed cases and 17 deaths have occurred in other countries around the world.

Due to the rapid spread of COVID-19, strong contagion, lethality in severe cases, and no specific medicine, it poses a huge threat to human life and health, and also has a huge impact on the mental health of the general public, causing people to differ degree of emotional problom [3]. 17 years ago, the emergence of SARS in China also caused widespread serious concerns, fears and heightened emotions [4,5]. So we can foresee that the outbreak of COVID-19 will course the public psychological reactions such as tension, anxiety, and fear which will lead to psychological disorders such as acute stress disorder post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and suicide. Academician Zhong Nanshan, the leader of the high-level expert group of the Chinese Health Commission, pointed out that psychological fear is more fearful than the disease itself [6]. Although infectious diseases elicits a wide range of emotional responses, not everyone experiences the same degree of emotional impact [7]. Hospital medical staff is always at the forefront of any particular epidemic and they risk their lives to perform their duties. Because they are more likely to be in close contact with COVID-19 patients, they are particularly vulnerable to infection and spread the virus among colleagues and family members. To date, more than 3,000 medical staff have been infected with COVID-19, and six of them have died. The number of infected medical personnel is unique in modern history. In addition to physical stress, medical staff also face huge mental burdens. This is particularly evident in the SARS and Ebola virus outbreaks [8,9]. Previou studies have found that SARS causes great pain to medical staff, and it causes much more pain to nurses than doctors [10]. This is due to the nature of the nurse’s job, which makes it easier to stay with patients for a long time. In addition, many hospital temporary workers resigned during the outbreak, and a large part of their work could only be performed by nurses. Therefore, the emotional problems of nurses during the COVID-19 epidemic deserve more attention.

In addition to the impact of the COVID-19 on people’s emotions, people’s coping strategies will also change as a result. Coping is the thoughts and actions that individuals use to deal with stressful events [11]. People have identified two general coping strategies: one is a problem-focused coping, the purpose is to solve the problem or take action to change the status quo; the other is an emotion-focused coping, which aims to reduce the emotional distress associated with stressful situations [12]. Studies have found that emotions lead to specific coping strategies [13], and vice versa. Emotions are thought to have motivational properties that motivate certain behaviors or behaviors [13,14]. For example, fear is related to the desire to evade and protect themselves from incidents, anger leads to desire to attack, disgust leads to desire to expel, and happiness leads to desire to entertain [13,15]. Moreover, emotions have been linked to the use of specific coping strategies [16]. In particular, adults who report more anger and fear prefer to use active-oriented coping strategies such as asking questions, while those who are sad are more likely to use non-active coping strategies such as avoiding or accepting problems [16]. In turn, the successful use of coping strategies will help individuals manage stressful events [11] and reduce negative emotions [12]. However, the direction of the relationship between emotion responses and coping strategies is not clear, and the relationship is not always constant. Some studies have found that the relationship between them is age-specific during SARS [17]. So, the relationship between nurses’ coping strategies and emotional response during a major infectious disease such as COVID-19 needs further research to clarify. To our knowledge, there has been no systematic assessment of the effects of COVID-19 on nurses’ emotional responses and coping strategies. Based on this, the purpose of this study was to explore the current status and relationship of emotional responses and coping strategies of nurses at all levels of hospitals in Anhui Province during the COVID-19 outbreak, and to compare them with non-front-line prospective nurses (nursing college students).

Methods

Results

Discussions

COVID-19 is a stress source with great influence, both for individuals and social public groups. Different individuals may experience different levels of psychological crisis, especially those at the core of the incident. The study found that nurses at the heart of the event exhibit stronger anxiety, fear, sadness, and anger than nursing college students. Although, when encountering infectious disease incidents, nursing college students will also produce strong psychological stress and concerns about future careers, showing bad emotional and behavioral experiences of emotional excitement, doubt, and helplessness [19]. But nursing college students experience far less psychological stress than nurses. This has a lot to do with the working environment of nurses. Although nurses and nursing college students have similar professional knowledge, nurses, as one of the most vulnerable groups, are at the core of infection risk. They will be worried about being infected due to close contact with patients, unfamiliarity with special working environments and procedures, physical discomfort and inconvenience caused by special protection, Facing the suffering and death of critically ill patients, long-term separation from family members, and Risking their lives to live with patients every day, etc., which all cause a certain psychological response to medical staff. When he hear that his family is in trouble, he also feel sorry for being unable to do anything for his family. When seeing the patient is very distressed, and even if he has done his best to still not be able to save his life, he will also feel self-defeating psychologically, and think that he is not a good nurse, which resulting in strong self-blame and guilt. When a patient complains, he will feel aggrieved and not understood. Fighting against specific infectious diseases is a serious challenge for medical staff, especially for nurses, who are at risk of death at any time, which coupled with stressful work, sleep deprivation, low freedom, heavy responsibility, and high degree of cooperation. Due to the shortage of medical staff, nurses are faced with physical, mental and environmental stimuli, which leads to increased psychological load on nurses and more serious emotional problems [20]. This result is consistent with existing studies. This result is consistent with the results of a recent study by Xu and Zhang [21], who found that 85.37% (35 patients) of the first-line nurses fighting COVID-19 had adverse emotional reactions, including 2 nurses with depression, 16 nurses with anxiety, and 21 nurses with terror. During the SARS outbreak, many nurses showed conflicting roles as medical service providers and parents. On the one hand, they felt altruistic and professionally responsible. On the other hand, they were afraid and guilty that they might infect their families [22]. Nickell (2004)’s study found that about 20% of the population suffers from emotional depression during SARS, and the incidence of nurses is as high as 45% in Toronto [23].

Long-term research has generally found that women have significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and loneliness than men. This is considered to be related to gender traits. Women themselves attach more importance to their inner experiences and self-perceptions, their emotions are more fragile and sensitive, and they are more vulnerable to depression, anxiety and Loneliness [24]. Our study support this conclusion, which finds that women show more severe anxiety and fear than men. During the SARS outbreak, Gao et al. (2003) found that more women than men call for psychological counseling, and the content of the consultation is mainly emotional issues [24]. This indicates that there are gender differences in psychological characteristics in the face of public health emergencies. This study also found that participants from urban showed more anxiety and fear than participants from rural, but rural participants showed more sadness than urban participants. This may be that the city is densely populated and has a large flow of people, and the epidemic situation in urban is more serious. The COVID-19 is more closer to the participants urban than the rural participants. Urban participants are more concerned about whether they may be infected, so they are more anxious and fearful. On the contrary, rural participants pay more attention to the illness of others, and have sadness for patients. In addition, we found that the severity of the epidemic in the city has no difference in individual emotions, which may indicate that the individual is not very concerned about the severity of the epidemic in the city, or it may be caused by the small difference in the severity of the epidemic in the cities selected in our study. However, this study found that the more precise spatial distance between the epidemic and the participants significantly affected individual emotions. This study found that participants in the community or administrative village affected by COVID-19 (with diagnosed patients or isolators) had stronger anxiety and anger than those in the community or administrative village where were not affected by COVID-19. Participants in the community or administrative village with diagnosed patients reported significantly higher levels of anxiety and anger than participants in the community or administrative village with isolators. The presence of diagnosed patients in a community or administrative village means a higher probability of being infected. The geographical location of COVID-19 patients and the spatial distance of participants are a reflection of psychological distance. The closer the psychological distance is. The more people feel the danger, the more sexual and threatening, the more intense anxiety and anger. Our results and the research results during the outbreak of SARS support this conclusion, and this change is also in line with the psychological development law of people in response to stressful events [25].

College students often use immature or negative coping strategies instead of positive problem coping when faced with the pressure caused by public health emergencies [26]. As a medical worker with clinical work experience, the nurse has more knowledge and strategies to face similar pressures. This is consistent with our research, which found that nurses are more proactive in using problem-focused coping than nursing college students. This study also found that women are more likely to use problem-focused coping than men, and less likely to use emotional-focused coping. As mentioned earlier, women are more vulnerable and sensitive on emotional issues, so emotional-focused coping is rarely used when dealing with stress. In addition, this study also found that participants in the communities or administrative villages with isolators were more likely to using emotional-focused coping than those in the communities or administrative villages where was not affected or with diagnosed patients. This may be because when the communities or administrative villages is not affected by COVID-19, the participants do not pay enough attention to COVID-19 and do not cause a strong emotional response, so there is no need to use emotional-focused coping. When diagnosed patient (that is, the spatial distance is particularly close) appears in the community or administrative village, participants may not use sufficient emotional-focused coping due to the psychological typhoon eye effect [27].

In subsequent analysis, it was found that anxiety, fear, and anger were significantly positively related to problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping. That is to say, there may be “the more coping the more panic” or “the more panic the more coping” or the “coping-panic cycle” The phenomenon. An analysis of the direction of the relationship between emotion and coping found that problem-focused coping has a significant predictive effect on anxiety and sadness. The explanatory power of anxiety is 3.4%, and the explanatory power of sadness is 0.9%, which indicating that the more problem-focused coping, the more anxious and sadness. Although both problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping have significant predictive effects on fear, the total explanatory power is 6%, but the explanatory power of problem-focused coping is 5.6%, and the explanatory power of emotion-focused coping is only 0.4%. Therefore, the more problem-focused coping, the more fear. Problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping both have a significant predictive effect on anger, with a total explanatory power of 2.6% and a problem-focused coping interpretation of 2.2%, but the explanatory power of emotion-focused coping is only 0.4%. This shows that problem-focused coping can predict emotional responses to a certain extent. This shows that there may be a phenomenon that “the more problem-focused coping, the more anxious, the more angry, the more sadness”.

Subsequently, our conducted a regression analysis on coping strategies, which found that fear and anger have a predictive effect on Problem-focused coping. The total explanatory power is 6%, the explanatory power of fear is 5.5%, and the explanatory power of anger is only 0.5%. Anger has a predictive effect on Emotion-focused coping, with an explanatory power of 2.2%. It can be seen that people may be the more fear, the more problem-focused coping, and the more angry, the more emotion-focused coping. Anxiety and sadness have no predictive effect on coping strategies. Combining the two parts of the regression analysis, it can be speculated that there may be a cycle of “the more fear—the more problem-focused coping” (forward interpretation power is 5.6%, reverse interpretation power is 5.5%), “the more angry, the more emotion-focused coping (2.2%) “,” The more problem-focused coping, the more anxious (3.4%), the more angry (2.2%), the more sadness (0.9%) “. During the outbreak of COVID-19, gender, urban/rural, and spatial distance will affect the anxiety, fear, sadness and anger and coping strategies of nurse and nursing college students. There is also a large emotional difference between nurses and nursing college students. Nurses have stronger emotional responses and are more willing to adopt Problem-focused coping. This study further reveals the direction of the relationship between emotional responses and coping strategies. In the outbreak of COVID-19, we suggest that hospitals should focus on providing psychological support to nurses, providing timely psychological assistance, training in coping strategies, providing adequate medical protective equipment, and taking a variety of interventions to block the spread of infectious diseases to form a medical environment where COVID-19 stops spreading in hospitals. It has created an optimistic environment and guarantees for personal safety for nurses, thereby enabling nurses to carry out ambulance work with high quality, and to provide a strong guarantee for resolutely winning the battle against epidemic prevention.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee. The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Wannan medical college.

Funding

This study was supported by Anhui province philosophy and social science planning project of China (AHSKQ2019D059).