The effectiveness of Ear Nose and Throat outreach programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: a systematic review

Introduction

Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander people represent the oldest continuous living culture in the world, despite ongoing inequities since colonisation [1]. Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children experience a markedly higher prevalence of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) diseases compared to non-Indigenous children [2-4]. Complex historical, cultural and economic factors experienced by Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander people since colonisation have interacted with behavioural and biological risk factors to influence this prevalence [2, 4].

The main condition contributing to this prevalence is otitis media, which is the inflammation of the middle ear, usually caused by bacterial and viral pathogens [4]. Compared to non-Indigenous children, Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children tend to experience this preventable and treatable condition at a younger age, more frequently, persistently, and severely, and with more serious complications [3, 5]. Community-based studies have shown the prevalence of otitis media and its complications at up to 73% in those under 12 months of age, and whole communities with otitis media affecting 91% of children [5]. This prevalence is likely perpetuated by socioeconomic factors including poverty, overcrowding, poor nutrition and infrastructure, exposure to cigarette smoke, and limited access to primary health care and treatment [3, 4, 6, 7].

The conductive hearing loss that results from untreated, chronic suppurative otitis media is responsible for the greatest burden of educational, social, and financial sequellae [3]. This is estimated to be 10-30% among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, well above the World Health Organisations cut off for ‘a massive public health problem requiring urgent attention’, which they quote as above 4% [3]. Hearing loss contributes to early learning difficulties including speech delays with resulting low self-esteem, poorer education outcomes [8, 9] and a significant economic burden [4]. This significant impact affects their long-term quality of life and life opportunities.

The majority of otitis media is managed in primary healthcare with referral to ENT specialists for assessment and surgical interventions where appropriate [10]. In Australia, referral to ENT specialists care is complex and varies across jurisdictions, with limited access to public ENT clinics [11]. However, in rural and remote settings, Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children face wait times that are longer than recommended for audiology testing and ENT services, with a higher likelihood that these services are unavailable. While the practice of most ENT surgeons in Australia is largely confined to metropolitan areas, fewer participate in outreach clinics to rural and remote areas [11]. To access ENT specialist services, patients are generally required to overcome barriers including travel, culturally inappropriate services, and unfamiliar health-system processes [12, 13]. Furthermore, the current system fails to routinely deliver care that aligns with government guidelines [14], nor provide culturally safe and accessible clinical pathways. Outreach services mobilise the expertise of health care teams and individual practitioners away from their usual place of work, generally to an underserviced area. This may take the form of traditional fly-in-fly-out services, or newer remote telemedicine enabled services. These services may be in a unique position to combat the challenges faced by the current system, with evidence for improved access, outcomes, service use, and less disruption to patient and family life when employed with well-functioning primary care services [15-18]. The aim is to provide a service that is truly accessible by the Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander community. While the role and benefits of outreach services are generally well recognised, rigorous evaluation of existing outreach programs is lacking, including those pertaining to ENT specialties, and as such, little is known about the impact and outcomes of such programs [19, 20]. The result is the implementation of programs without sufficient planning or evidence base [2]. This review aims primarily to examine the ability of ENT outreach programs to improving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health outcomes, and secondarily to elucidate factors predicting success, and barriers to success of such programs.

Methods

Results

Study selection

The database search, grey literature, and hand search identified 930, 34 articles, and 5 studies respectively, with 506 remaining following duplicate removal. Of the 506 studies that were screened, 434 were excluded and 72 underwent full-text review. A further 54 were excluded ultimately leaving 15 articles included in the review (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart

Discussion

This review examined the ability of ENT outreach programs to improve health outcomes among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and included 15 studies of eight programs. We found that while study outcome measures were linked to program aims, these links could be peripheral or did not provide sufficiently rigorous data to evaluate programs. Study characteristics varied widely but overall, positive changes were seen in middle ear and/or hearing health in five of the eight programs [14, 25, 29, 34, 35]. These results should be interpreted carefully as all measures of service delivery, referral rates, attendance rates, wait times, were difficult to contextualise given a lack of baseline data and inter-study variation in the methods and clinical thresholds used to monitor changes.

Despite these limitations, these six programs appear to produce positive results in the communities which they are delivered. However, the limited quantity and quality of evidence, a lack of coordination of programs, and the appropriateness and acceptability of services is likely contributing to the ongoing burden of ear disease in Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children [2]. Although over 50 current or recent ear health programs exist across Australia [37], we found a paucity of literature evaluating their programs. This is consistent with a recent review of physical activity programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that found that while many programs existed, few were comprehensively evaluated [38]. Among the included studies, there was marked heterogeneity in the setting and nature of interventions and evaluation, including their outcome measures. A lack of standardised systems for monitoring changes in incidence and prevalence of ear disease limits the ability to measure and attribute changes in disease states to the actions of a program [26, 39]. However, regular evaluation in the form of continuous quality improvement frameworks have been shown to improve the quality of healthcare for Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children as well as health outcomes in other areas including antenatal care, immunisations, smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cervical screening [40, 41]. Several ear health indicators that are potentially extractable from electronic health records have been recommended [41]. Though these indicators have only been validated in the primary health setting so far, there is potential for their use in the ongoing evaluation of ENT outreach programs.

Sustainable outreach benefits in disease prevention, treatment, and management may occur with coordinated service delivery [2, 42]. We are limited in our ability to draw conclusions regarding the coordination of all Australian ENT services as many programs do not provide evaluation data that could be included in this systematic review. The included programs took place across three states, Qld, the NT and WA, in multiple settings. Services were delivered as part of, or in association with numerous programs with little to no evidence of interaction or coordination between these programs in terms of aims, service delivery, coverage, or funding bodies. Effective outreach programs require efficient integration of incoming ENT services with existing primary health care services and the broader community [17]. One program, the MTESS, reported integration with the community through the local AHW and close alignment with primary care services to be important factors in success [29, 30] and this is recommended to strengthen future program delivery.

There is currently a discordance between service delivery and burden of disease [15]. A significant barrier to coordination is the lack of population level data detailing the epidemiology of ear disease in Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children [26, 39] as strategic delivery of services is limited when need cannot be directly pinpointed. A national outreach service register has been suggested as a way of identifying areas of over or under supply [17]. The MTESS reports the probability of service uptake in areas was directly linked to the provision of services [28], reiterated by the HHP where audiology, ENT, and clinical nurse specialist service numbers dropped following a shortage of available specialists [25]. The result is ad-hoc service delivery contributing to a lack of coordination, inequity and unsustainable service delivery [16-18, 42]. Finally, while outreach programs play a role in improving the health of Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander children, they form only one piece of the puzzle. Coordination is required between multiple sectors to effectively address the socioeconomic and historical aetiology of ear disease. While the DEDKDC Framework prioritised multi-sector collaboration and coordination, there was little evidence of these activities [26].

Outreach programs are often large and multi-faceted, leading to complexities in evaluation. Studies that are fragmented from program aims impede the development of program learnings and limits the ability of past programs to critically inform the development of future programs. The scarcity of program evaluation hinders a global assessment of factors predicting success, or barriers to success of ENT outreach programs, as originally planned in this review. However, factors known to impact on the success of outreach programs are regular and predictable service, and communication with and accountability to the community [18]. The frequency and regularity of outreach events in programs included in this review were largely unclear and a lack of accountability leads to irregularity and unpredictability, creating issues with delayed follow up and inadequate support [18].

Furthermore, this review revealed a deficiency in collaboration with communities in planning, service delivery, and evaluation of included programs, indicating a lack of communication with and accountability to the community. This finding is consistent with the literature where the status quo sees services for Aboriginal and or Torres Strait Islander peoples developed without their input [43]. Acceptable healthcare delivery relies on effective collaboration, which necessitates the genuine involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and valuing of traditional practices [44, 45]. MTESS service highlighted the importance of this process in their ability to sustain integration of the service with primary healthcare and the deliver ongoing convenient and timely services [29]. Furthermore, activities run under the DEDKDC Framework were reported to have greater attendance where AHWs were present [46]. Other recommendations for sustainability include an adequate primary care and specialist base, a multidisciplinary framework centred in primary care, funding and coordination that recognises responsibilities primary, secondary and tertiary care and regular evaluation. [18].

There is a strengthened resolve when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are involved in the planning, running and evaluation of ENT outreach clinics. Codesign and capacity building must be part of any outreach program and continual re-evaluation is strongly recommended. There is also a need to ensure services are complemented by programs that add value and with translational research outcomes that support communities. Working solutions backed by evidence and community benefits need to be published and supported broadly to apply to local conditions.

Conclusion

This review discovered a paucity of evaluation of ENT outreach programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Fifteen evaluations of eight programs were identified that were heterogeneous in study design and of variable methodological quality. While individual studies reflected positive outcomes of programs, including positive changes in middle ear and/or hearing health from six programs, the ability of these programs to improve the overall ear-health status of Aboriginal children remains unclear. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of ENT outreach programs may be limited by a lack of coordination of services and the provision of potentially unsustainable services. There were also low levels of involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in program and evaluation design and delivery and we recommend greater involvement in all future program and evaluation aspects to strengthen their impact and outcomes.

Funding and conflicts of interest

This review was not funded and no conflicts of interest were identified.