Interventions targeting air travellers early in the pandemic may delay local outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2

Aim To determine if interventions aimed at air travellers can delay establishment of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in a previously unaffected country with no shared border with China.

Methods Summary Determining how many imported cases are needed to trigger an outbreak in a new location is critical to quantifying if SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks can be delayed. Here we rely on the “outbreak threshold”, which is a function of the average number of secondary cases produced by each infected case, plus the variation from person-to-person in how many secondary cases they generate (often referred to as “the dispersion parameter, k”). We define a traveller intervention as either: a) screening for symptoms at either departure or arrival, b) sensitisation of arrivals to signs of illness, or c) a combination of both. We assume that sensitisation will result in a lower individual reproduction number for the traveller (e.g. by self-isolation and more rapid reporting which triggers contact tracing) and that syndromic screening reduces the number of infected travellers who can seed an outbreak. We then calculate the delay in reaching the outbreak threshold according to the number of infected travellers arriving each week, and the effectiveness of interventions a, b, and c, assuming the basic reproduction number to be gamma distributed with CIs ranging from 1.4 to 3.9. Because of the considerable uncertainty in the estimate we report no central estimates but rather 50% and 95% quantiles, focusing specifically on the lower bounds as a measure of likely minimal impact.

Results Summary We evaluated sensitisation effectiveness of 30, 50 and 70%, assuming either 1, 10, or 100 infected travellers per week. We found that early in the outbreak when only few infected travellers arrive, traveller sensitisation can delay a major outbreak in a previously unaffected region. For 50% effectiveness, and assuming 1 infected traveller per week, we find that in 75% of simulations the outbreak is delayed by at least 11 days (97.5% of simulations: at least 7 days). The possible delay decreases rapidly for more travellers, lower effectiveness of sensitisation, higher R₀ or lower heterogeneity thereof. However, syndromic traveller screening at departure and/or arrival can further enhance impact. In combination with sensitisation, syndromic screening can delay an outbreak substantially longer. In 75% of simulations we find an outbreak delay of at least 111 days (97.5% of simulations: at least 23 days) for 1 infected traveller per week and at least 9 days (97.5% of simulations: at least 4 days) for 10 infected travellers per week.

Limitations include

• We assume a constant rate of infected travellers. However, this may increase rapidly as the epidemic continues to spread exponentially in China and potentially elsewhere. There is currently little evidence for an exponential increase in infected travellers to Europe as airports in the highest risk regions have shut. If indeed infected traveller numbers were to increase exponentially numbers would increase from 1 to 10 and 100 per week within about 19 and 38 days respectively (assuming R=2.5 and serial interval of 7.5) and estimated delays would decrease accordingly.

• The only estimate from the current outbreak for the variation between individuals in the number of secondary cases (k) is including large confidence intervals that span estimates for SARS and seasonal influenza. The estimated delay of an outbreak was highly sensitive to k.

• We assume that syndromic surveillance at entry leads to immediate case isolation and hence no onward transmission. This is ignoring that during the flight the index case may have infected other travellers.

• We assume that only sensitised travellers would pick up quickly on relevant symptoms and self-isolate and report to trigger contact tracing. Non sensitised travellers are assumed to not pay attention to early influenza-like symptoms during the winter season and hence only report with severe symptoms, i.e. when most of secondary cases have been infected and themselves have potentially further spread the virus. This may overestimate the estimated impact of sensitisation.

• We don’t explicitly account for potential asymptomatic transmission. However, we implicitly do so as both the syndromic screening as well as the contact tracing work that infomed our estimates accounted for a small proportion of asymptomatic transmitters.