Abstract
Metformin and Thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitizers used as the first-line treatment of PCOS, which are recently being examined for their extensive beneficial impacts at biochemical and molecular level of body function in Polycystic ovary syndrome. Therefore, purpose of this review is to compare the effectiveness of Metformin and Thiazolidinediones on vascular endothelial function in PCOS. MEDLINE (1966- October 2018), CINAHL (1982 to October 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (October 2018) and Google Scholar were searched electronically without language restriction. Three Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected with a total of 90 participants comparing effect of Metformin (Intervention) to Thiazolidinediones (Comparator) with an outcome on endothelial function among women with PCOS. In results, Meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference on endothelial-dependent vasodilation between Metformin and Thiazolidinedione (p value= 0.59 at 95% CI - 1.31, 0.74).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding was received at any stage of preparing this manuscript.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None
Funding: No funding was received at any stage of preparing this manuscript.
Ethical issues: No ethical approval was required as it is a secondary synthesis of published studies.
Data Availability
Since this is a systematic review, hence data was collected from the primary studies included in this review as per predetermined eligibility criteria.
