Abstract
Purpose To achieve a highly balanced comparison of trabecular bypass stenting (IS2, iStent inject)with ab interno trabeculectomy (T, Trabectome) by exact matching. In a similar study, IS1 (1st generation iStent) had shown a loss of effect at 6 months.
Methods 53 IS2 eyes were matched to 3446 T eyes. Patients were matched using exact matching by baseline IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, and glaucoma type and using nearest neighbor matching by age. Individuals without a close match were excluded. All surgeries were combined with phacoemulsification.
Results A total of 78 eyes (39 in each group) could be matched as exact pairs with a baseline IOP of 18.3±5.1 mmHg and glaucoma medications of 2.7±1.2 in each. IOP in IS2 was reduced to 14.6±4.2 mmHg at 3 months and in T to a minimum of 13.1±3.2 mmHg at 1 month. In IS2, IOP began to rise again at 6 months, eventually exceeding baseline. At 24 months, IOP in IS2 was 18.8±9.0 mmHg and in T 14.2±3.5 mmHg. IS2 had a higher average IOP than T at all postoperative visits (p<0.05 at 1, 12, 18 months). Glaucoma medications decreased to 2.0±1.5 in IS2 and to 1.5±1.4 in T.
Conclusion T resulted in a larger and sustained IOP reduction compared to IS2 where a rebound occurred after six months to slightly above preoperative values. This time course fits bioreactivity data of the IS1.
Competing Interest Statement
Nils Loewen has received honoraria for wetlabs and presentations at international meetings from Neomedix Inc.
Funding Statement
no external funding was received
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data presented is contained in the manuscript
