Abstract
Objectives Excess risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in UK South Asians (SA) and African Caribbeans (AC) compared to Europeans remain unexplained. We studied risks and determinants of T2DM in first- and second-generation (born in the UK) migrants, and in those of mixed ethnicity.
Design Cross sectional analysis comparing T2DM in 2nd versus 1st generation migrants, and mixed ethnicity with non-mixed groups. Risks and explanations were analysed using logistic regression and mediation analysis, respectively.
Setting UK Biobank, a population-based cohort of ~500k participants aged 40-69 at recruitment.
Participants Ethnicity was both self-reported and genetically-assigned using admixture level scores. Europeans, mixed European/South Asians (MixESA), mixed European/African Caribbeans (MixEAC), SA and AC groups were analysed, matched for age and sex to enable comparison.
Main outcome measures T2DM using self-report and glycated haemoglobin
Results – T2DM prevalence was three to five times higher in SA and AC compared with Europeans [OR (95%CI): 4.80(3.60,6.40) and 3.30(2.70,4.10), respectively]. T2DM was 20-30% lower in second-versus first-generation SA and AC [0.78(0.60,1.01) and 0.71(0.57,0.87), respectively]. Favourable adiposity contributed to lower risk in 2nd generation migrants. T2DM in mixed populations was lower than comparator ethnic groups [MixESA versus SA 0.29(0.21,0.39), MixEAC versus AC 0.48(0.37,0.62)] and higher than Europeans, in MixESA 1.55(1.11, 2.17), and in MixEAC 2.06 (1.53, 2.78). Greater socioeconomic deprivation accounted for 17% and 42% of the excess T2DM risk in MixESA and MixEAC compared to Europeans, respectively. Replacing self-reported with genetically-assigned ethnicity corroborated the mixed population analysis.
Conclusions T2DM risks in 2nd generation SA and AC migrants are a fifth lower than 1st generation migrants. Mixed ethnicity risks were markedly lower than SA and AC groups, though remaining higher than in Europeans. Distribution of environmental risk factors, largely obesity and socioeconomic status, play a key role in accounting for ethnic differences in T2DM risk.
Competing Interest Statement
Grant funding for research but no other competing interest
Funding Statement
Joint Diabetes UK and British Heart Foundation grant 15/0005250
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from UK Biobank.
