Cohort profile: The International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa, 2012-2019

Frédérique Chammartin, Cam Ha Dao Ostinelli, Kathryn Anastos, Antoine Jaquet, Ellen Brazier, Steven Brown, François Dabis, Mary-Ann Davies, Stephany N Duda, Karen Malateste, Denis Nash, Kara K Wools-Kaloustian, Per M von Groote, Matthias Egger
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19010231

ABSTRACT

Purpose The objectives of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) are to (i) evaluate the delivery of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in children, adolescents and adults in sub-Saharan Africa, (ii) to describe ART regimen effectiveness, durability and tolerability, (iii) to examine HIV-related comorbidities and co-infections, and (iv) to examine the pregnancy- and HIV-related outcomes of women on ART and their infants exposed to HIV or antiretroviral therapy in utero or via breastmilk.

Participants IeDEA is organized in four regions (Central, East, Southern and West Africa), with 240 treatment and care sites, six data centres at African, European and US universities, and almost 1.4 million children, adolescents and adult people living with HIV (PLWHIV) enrolled.

Findings to date The data include socio-demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, opportunistic events, treatment regimens, clinic visits and laboratory measurements. They have been used to analyse outcomes in people living with HIV-1 or HIV-2 who initiate ART, including determinants of mortality, of switching to second-line and third-line ART, drug resistance, loss to follow-up and the immunological and virological response to different ART regimens. Programme-level estimates of mortality have been corrected for loss to follow-up. We examined the impact of co-infection with hepatitis B and C, and the epidemiology of different cancers and of (multi-drug resistant) tuberculosis, renal disease and of mental illness. The adoption of “Treat All”, making ART available to all PLWHIV regardless of CD4+ cell count or clinical stage was another important research topic.

Future plans IeDEA has formulated several research priorities for the “Treat All” era in sub-Saharan Africa. It recently obtained funding to set up sentinel sites where additional data are prospectively collected on cardiometabolic risks factors as well as mental health and liver diseases, and is planning to create a drug resistance database.

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa from 2004 onwards has substantially improved the prognosis of HIV-1 infection, with a decline in AIDS-related deaths [1] and a decline in the incidence of new HIV-1 infections [2]. However, in many settings HIV/AIDS is still a public health threat. An estimated 1.8 million new infections occurred in 2017 and almost a million adult and child deaths were due to HIV, most of them in sub-Saharan Africa [2].

The World Health Organization (WHO), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and many of the countries most heavily affected by the HIV epidemic have committed to ending HIV/AIDS as a major public health problem by 2030.[1] Targets to be reached by 2020 include that 90% of people living with HIV (PLWHIV) be aware of their status, 90% of those diagnosed initiate ART, and 90% of those on ART achieve undetectable viral loads (the 90-90-90 targets) [3]. Progress towards these goals has been substantial, especially in the most affected regions of Eastern and Southern Africa. The latest estimates suggested that the two regions are on track and had achieved 76%, 79% and 83% of the 90-90-90 targets, respectively in 2017 [4]. West and Central Africa face difficulties with the first 90% target and only an estimated 42% of PLWHIV in these regions were aware of their status [4].

Established more than ten years ago by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) are a global cohort collaboration that collects HIV/AIDS data from HIV care and treatment programs, including in sub-Saharan Africa. The regional IeDEA data centres consolidate, curate and analyse data to evaluate the outcomes of people living with HIV/AIDS and monitor progress. The first years of the cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa were described previously [5]; here we provide an update on methods, key data and future plans.

COHORT DESCRIPTION

In 2006 the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) sought applications for a global consortium structured through regional centres to pool clinical and epidemiological data on PLWHIV, in order to address questions that could not be answered by individual cohorts [5]. IeDEA covers seven geographic regions, namely North America, the Caribbean and Central/South America, the Asia-Pacific and four regions in sub-Saharan Africa: West Africa, Central Africa, East Africa and Southern Africa. The project was initially funded for a 5-year period and has since been extended twice, with the current funding cycle ending in 2021.

Settings and number of PLWHIV enrolled

To date, the African regions of IeDEA received data from 240 HIV care and treatment facilities in 19 sub-Saharan African countries (Figure 1A). Close to 1,400,000 PLWHIV who initiated ART in sub-Saharan Africa are included (Figure 1B), of whom over 680,000 are currently in care. In East and Southern Africa, both urban and rural facilities are well represented, while in Central and West Africa, urban facilities dominate. Facilities are predominately public (95%) and operated at the primary or secondary care level, with the exception of West Africa where 70% of facilities are at the tertiary level of care (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1:

Characteristics of 240 facilities providing ART in the African regions if the IeDEA (source: site assessment survey 2017).

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Map of the 240 active facilities participating in the four African regions of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (A), together with cumulative numbers of patients starting antiretroviral therapy (B).

Data collection at individual and site level

Since its inception, IeDEA has collected routine clinical data of PLWHIV followed under treatment, which includes socio-demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, opportunistic events, treatment regimens, clinic visits and laboratory measurements. More recently, the IeDEA network has developed a Data Exchange Standard (DES) protocol (see www.iedeades.org) with 25 data tables, which include a total of 228 unique variables (36 compulsory and 192 additional variables) and within-region unique patient research identifiers. Standardized data collection is supported by eight codebooks, including the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification for drugs and lists with codes for reasons for stopping treatment, for dropping out of the cohort, for mode of HIV infection, country, type and site of comorbidities, laboratory measurements and units of measurements and type of viral load assay. The collection, management and sharing of data is facilitated by the Harmonist toolkit, a software and standards package that supports research projects through the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system [6].

In recent years, site assessments and site surveys have been conducted on a regular basis to collect up-to-date information related to available clinical service and care models in the participating facilities. For example, a study compared the characteristics and comprehensiveness of adult HIV care and treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa with programmes in the Americas and Asia-Pacific region [7]. Other studies examined the management of mental health and substance use disorders [8], or the diagnostic and screening practices for (drug resistant) tuberculosis in adult and paediatric patients [9–11]. Furthermore, the routine data collected by participating sites have been enriched in some countries by linking the routine HIV databases to cancer registries [12,13], vital registries [14] or administrative databases [15].

Trends in CD4 cell count and viral load measurements

While WHO continues to recommend a CD4 cell count before starting ART to inform the management of advanced disease and differentiated care in the Treat All era, it also recommends that CD4 testing be replaced by viral load measurement for monitoring of treatment and identification of treatment failure [16]. Figure 2 shows that in Southern and West Africa, the number of CD4 measurements tended to be stable over time, despite an increasing number of PLWHIV in care, while in East and Central Africa the number of CD4 measurements dropped. At present, 53% of the active facilities reported routine CD4 testing and 65% routine viral load testing (Table 1). The United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which provides substantial funding for AIDS treatment, care and prevention in countries most affected by the epidemic, has progressively reduced its support for CD4 testing [17].

Figure 2:
Figure 2:

Daily number of CD4 cell counts (left) and viral load measurements (right) over time (bar chart) and the cumulative number of patients in care (red line).

Trends in antiretroviral therapy

Until recently, the recommended first-line ART regimen in sub-Saharan Africa consisted of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (2NRTIs+1NNRTI). The combination of tenofovir (TDF), lamivudine (3TC) (or emtricitabine (FTC)) and efavirenz (EFV) is the current treatment of choice. The phasing out of stavudine (D4T) and nevirapine (NVP) was almost complete in 2014 (Table 2). East Africa and Southern Africa are currently rolling out dolutegravir (DTG), an integrase inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance [18][19]. Due to concerns about an increased risk of neural tube defects if taken during pregnancy[20], the roll-out to women has been delayed or limited in some settings. Of note, drug stock-outs in the last 12 months were reported by 59 facilities for first-line drugs, and by 45 for second-line drugs (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 2:

Proportion of patients with different nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors regimen at ART start over time, by region.

Mortality and retention in care

In cohorts of PLWHIV who initiated ART in consecutive two-year periods from 2001 to 2016, mortality at 3 years declined substantially in all African IeDEA regions (Figure 3A). Loss to follow-up, defined as more than 90 days late to the next scheduled visit, remained substantial in all regions, and particularly high in Southern Africa (Figure 3B). Retention in care is key to the success of the public health approach to ART. Loss to follow-up has been an important issue for IeDEA, and activities to trace PLWHIV not returning to the clinic have increased in recent years. At present, tracing of PLWHIV on ART who were lost to follow-up is in place in 89% of the active facilities; 75% have implemented it routinely (Table 1). Tracing methods vary widely across facilities and include phone calls and home visits by clinic staff or community health workers.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Trends in mortality (A) and loss to follow (B), 2001 to 2016.

Patient and public involvement

IeDEA is based on the collection of routine clinical data and no patients were involved in developing the research question, outcome measures and overall design of the collaboration. Due to the anonymous nature of the data, we cannot disseminate the results of analyses of the data directly to study participants.

KEY RESEARCH AREAS AND PUBLICATIONS

Over 500 publications in MEDLINE acknowledge funding from a core grant from the NIH to one or several African IeDEA regions, and these publications have been cited over 10,000 times. Multiregional projects are developed in IeDEA working groups, which currently address eight clinical areas: (i) cancer, (ii) ART outcomes, (iii) hepatitis, (iv) mental health, (v) mother-infant and paediatrics, (vi) renal disease, (vii) substance use and (viii) tuberculosis. Multiregional research concepts are discussed in the Executive Committee of IeDEA, revised and approved or rejected. In recent years, several analyses were done in collaboration with WHO or UNAIDS [21–23]. The number of publications reporting multi-regional analyses from several African IeDEA regions increased over time, from one such publication in 2007 to 24 multiregional publications in 2018. Some of the key studies are summarised below, with a focus on more recent and on multiregional analyses.

Treatment outcomes in adults, adolescents, children and pregnant women

Several studies examined outcomes in people living with HIV-1 or HIV-2 who initiate ART, including determinants of mortality, of switching to second-line and third-line ART, drug resistance, loss to follow-up and the immunological and virological response to different ART regimens [24–37]. For example, the African IeDEA regions contributed importantly to a large-scale analysis of outcomes in adolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV, which showed that HIV-associated mortality during adolescence was substantially higher in sub-Saharan Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and South America and the Caribbean than in Europe [36]. A similar analysis of adolescents living with HIV showed that mortality and loss to follow-up were worse among those entering care at 15 years or older [37]. The authors concluded that adolescents must be evaluated separately from younger children and adults to identify population-specific reasons for death and loss to follow-up [37].

Programme-level mortality

It became clear early on during the scale-up of ART in sub-Saharan Africa, that loss to follow-up of patients initiating ART was substantial [38], and that mortality among patients lost was higher than among patients remaining in care [39]. Ignoring loss to follow-up might thus bias programme-level estimates of mortality, and much effort has gone into correcting programme-level mortality for loss to follow-up [40–46]. For example, an analysis of all four African regions showed that when analysing the uncorrected data observed in the clinics, 52% of adults and children were retained on ART, 42% were lost to follow-up and 6% had died 5 years after ART initiation [46]. After accounting for undocumented deaths and self-transfers, an estimated 67% of patients were retained on ART, 19% had stopped ART and 15% had died [46].

Co-infections and co-morbidities

IeDEA investigators have examined the prevalence and impact of co-infection with hepatitis B and C, and the epidemiology of different cancers and of (multi-drug resistant) tuberculosis, renal disease and of mental illness [8,47–58]. For example, an analysis of IeDEA data and data from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research in Europe (COHERE) [59] showed that children living with HIV from sub-Saharan Africa, but not those from Europe or Asia had a high risk of developing Kaposi sarcoma after starting ART [58]. Similarly, a recent analysis of IeDEA and COHERE data showed that compared to European women, rates of cervical cancer were 11 times higher in South Africa [50]. A recent multiregional study of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis included HIV positive and HIV negative adults with tuberculosis from seven high-burden countries (Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Peru, and Thailand). Molecular or phenotypic drug susceptibility testing was done locally and at a reference laboratory. The results showed that inaccurate local drug susceptibility testing led to under-treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis and increased mortality [54].

The challenge of “Treat All”

Nearly all countries in sub-Saharan Africa have now adopted national polices to offer ART to all PLWHIV regardless of CD4 cell count or clinical stage (‘Treat All’), in order to meet the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In 2011, Malawi was one of the first countries to implement such a strategy for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), recommending ART for pregnant and breastfeeding women living with HIV, regardless of CD4 cell count or WHO clinical stage (“Option B+”). An IeDEA analysis of the Malawian experience showed that poor retention in care was a problem in many facilities, with early loss to follow-up particularly high in facilities with a high patient volume and in patients who start ART during pregnancy on the day of HIV diagnosis [35]. More recently, IeDEA investigators used regression discontinuity analysis to examine changes in rapid HIV treatment initiation after national “Treat All” policy adoption in six countries (Burundi, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Uganda, Zambia) [60]. They showed a strong and sustained effect of the adoption of “Treat All” policies on ART initiation within 30 days of enrollment in HIV care in all six countries [60].

THE FUTURE

At the end of 2018, IeDEA published a consensus statement [61] and a journal supplement [62] on research priorities to inform the implementation of the “Treat All” policy in children and adolescents[63], pregnant and post-partum women [64], and for mental health, substance use [65] and drug resistance [66]. These documents will guide IeDEA’s future research agenda in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, the creation of an IeDEA Sentinel Research Network (IeDEA-SRN) will facilitate the collection of detailed data in selected IeDEA sites on cardio-metabolic risk factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia) liver disease (liver fibrosis and steatosis), mental health and substance use. In the East and Southern African regions, pharmacovigilance in pregnancy is being developed to assess the impact of ART on birth outcomes. A project involving all four African regions studies the cascade of screening for cervical cancer, while the establishment of the South African HIV Cancer Match (SAM) study of over ten million PLWHIV, from linkage of national laboratory with cancer registry data, will allow the study of less common cancers. Finally, the creation of a drug resistance database as a central repository for resistance tests performed in routine clinical care is another planned addition.

COLLABORATIONS

The African regions of IeDEA have collaborated and continue to encourage collaborations with other consortia, cohort collaborations, the HIV modelling community and public health agencies as well as individuals wishing to use IeDEA data. Examples include work with COHERE [50,58,67,68], the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) collaboration [36,69] or the Measurement & Surveillance of HIV Epidemics (MeSH) consortium [22] as well as UNAIDS [22,23] and WHO [21]. Furher collaborations are welcome. Investigators wishing to work with the IeDEA data should contact the teams at the regional data centres (see www.iedea.org for contact details) and send a concept sheet for the analyses they are interested in performing and the variables that would be required. Anyone wishing to work with IeDEA must sign a data-use agreement.

Data Availability

Investigators wishing to work with IeDEA data should contact the regional data centres (see www.iedea.org) and send a concept sheet for the analyses they are interested in performing and the variables that would be required. See www.iedeades.org for list of variables. Those wishing to work with the data must sign a data-use agreement.

FOOTNOTES

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the clinical and administrative staff at the participating clinics. We are grateful to all PLWHIV who contributed to the IeDEA database.

Contributors

FC, PMG, and ME conceptualised the study. FC and CHDO performed statistical analyses. FC and ME wrote the first draft of the paper. CHDO, KA, AJ, EB, SB, FD, MAD, SND, KM, BSM, DN, KWK, CY, PMG and ME contributed to interpreting the data and to the writing and revising of the manuscript.

Funding

The International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) is supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Fogarty International Center, the National Library of Medicine, and the Office of the Director: Central Africa, U01AI096299; East Africa, U01AI069911; Southern Africa, U01AI069924; West Africa, U01AI069919. Informatics resources are supported by the Harmonist project, R24AI124872. ME was supported by special project funding (Grant No. 174281) from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Disclaimer

The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NIAD or the US Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests

None declared.

Ethics approval

Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland.

Provenance and peer review

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data sharing statement

Investigators wishing to work with IeDEA data should contact the regional data centres (see www.iedea.org) and send a concept sheet for the analyses they are interested in performing and the variables that would be required. See www.iedeades.org for list of variables. Those wishing to work with the data must sign a data-use agreement.

Open Access

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Box: Strengths and limitations of this study

  • An important strength of the IeDEA cohort collaboration in sub-Saharan Africa is its large size, which allows analyses of outcomes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in children, adolescents and pregnant and postpartum women, across diverse settings.

  • The data reflect routine care across a wide range of real-world settings during the scale up of ART in sub-Saharan Africa and thus provide a valuable platform to conduct operational and clinical research and to study temporal trends and the impact of changes in guidelines and other interventions.

  • The development of a standardised Data Exchange Standard protocol has contributed to increase data quality, and data have been enriched by linkage to cancer registries, vital registries and administrative databases.

  • Collaborations with the World Health Organization, UNAIDS, the mathematical modelling community and other consortia have ensured that the analyses of the African IeDEA regions contributed substantially to global health policy and decision making.

  • Weaknesses include the limitations inherent in secondary use of routine clinical care data, with missing data, the lack of standardised follow-up visits, and substantial loss to follow-up resulting in unknown outcome.

  • Additional challenges include the lack of population-based samples, including HIV negative controls or ART-naive comparison groups, and the lack of measurements such as non-communicable disease risk factors and outcomes. Dealing with risk factors that affect clinical decision making, and the need to control for (time-dependent) confounding can also be challenging.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    UNAIDS. Global AIDS update 2016. Geneva, Switzerland: 2016.
  2. ↵
  3. ↵
    UNAIDS. 90-90-90: An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva, Switzerland: 2014.
  4. ↵
    UNAIDS. Ending AIDS. Progress towards the 90-90-90-targets. Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.
  5. ↵
    Egger M, Ekouevi DK, Williams C, et al. Cohort Profile: The international epidemiological databases to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:1256– 64. doi:10.1093/ije/dyr080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Duda SNSN, Farr AMAM, Lindegren MLML, et al. Characteristics and comprehensiveness of adult HIV care and treatment programmes in Asia-Pacific, sub-Saharan Africa and the Americas: results of a site assessment conducted by the International epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS Collaboration. J Int AIDS Soc 2014;17:19045. doi:10.7448/IAS.17.1.19045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Parcesepe AM, Mugglin C, Nalugoda F, et al. Screening and management of mental health and substance use disorders in HIV treatment settings in low- and middle-income countries within the global IeDEA consortium. J Int AIDS Soc 2018;21:e25101. doi:10.1002/jia2.25101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Ballif M, Nhandu V, Wood R, et al. Detection and management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients in lower-income countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Off J Int Union Tuberc Lung Dis 2014;18:1327–36. doi:10.5588/ijtld.14.0106
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. Fenner L, Forster M, Boulle A, et al. Tuberculosis in HIV programmes in lower-income countries: practices and risk factors. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Off J Int Union Tuberc Lung Dis 2011;15:620–7. doi:10.5588/ijtld.10.0249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ballif M, Renner L, Claude Dusingize J, et al. Tuberculosis in Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Diagnosis and Screening Practices. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc 2015;4:30–8. doi:10.1093/jpids/piu020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Horner M-J, Chasimpha S, Spoerri A, et al. High Cancer Burden Among Antiretroviral Therapy Users in Malawi: a Record Linkage Study of Observational HIV Cohorts and Cancer Registry Data. Clin Infect Dis Published Online First: 17 November 2018. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy960
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    Dhokotera T, Bohlius J, Spoerri A, et al. The burden of cancers associated with HIV in the South African public health sector, 2004-2014: a record linkage study. Infect Agent Cancer 2019;14:12. doi:10.1186/s13027-019-0228-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Boulle A, Schomaker M, May MT, et al. Mortality in patients with HIV-1 infection starting antiretroviral therapy in South Africa, Europe, or North America: a collaborative analysis of prospective studies. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001718. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001718
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Davies M-A, Tsondai P, Tiffin N, et al. Where do HIV-infected adolescents go after transfer? - Tracking transition/transfer of HIV-infected adolescents using linkage of cohort data to a health information system platform. J Int AIDS Soc 2017;20:21668. doi:10.7448/IAS.20.4.21668
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva, Switzerland: 2013.
  17. ↵
    (PEPFAR). PEPFAR 2018 Country Operational Plan Guidance for Standard Process Countries Table of Contents. 2018.
  18. ↵
    Cottrell ML, Hadzic T, Kashuba ADM. Clinical Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Drug-Interaction Profile of the Integrase Inhibitor Dolutegravir. Clin Pharmacokinet 2013;52:981–94. doi:10.1007/s40262-013-0093-2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    Mesplede T, Quashie PK, Osman N, et al. Viral fitness cost prevents HIV-1 from evading dolutegravir drug pressure. Retrovirology 2013;10:22. doi:10.1186/1742-4690-10-22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Zash R, Holmes L, Diseko M, et al. Neural-Tube Defects and Antiretroviral Treatment Regimens in Botswana. N Engl J Med 2019;:EJMoa1905230. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1905230
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    Zaniewski E, Tymejczyk O, Kariminia A, et al. IeDEA-WHO Research-Policy Collaboration: contributing real-world evidence to HIV progress reporting and guideline development. J Virus Erad 2018;4:9–15.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Anderegg N, Johnson LF, Zaniewski E, et al. All-cause mortality in HIV-positive adults starting combination antiretroviral therapy: correcting for loss to follow-up. AIDS Lond Engl 2017;31 Suppl 1:S31–40. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001321
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    Mahy M, Penazzato M, Ciaranello A, et al. Improving estimates of children living with HIV from the Spectrum AIDS Impact Model. AIDS Lond Engl 2017;31 Suppl 1:S13–22. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001306
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Davies M-AM-AA, May M, Bolton-Moore C, et al. Prognosis of Children With HIV-1 Infection Starting Antiretroviral Therapy in Southern Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014;33:608–16. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000000214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. Petersen ML, Tran L, Geng EH, et al. Delayed switch of antiretroviral therapy after virologic failure associated with elevated mortality among HIV-infected adults in Africa. AIDS Lond Engl 2014;28:2097–107. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000349
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. Tchounga BK, Hønge BL, Eholie SP, et al. Effect of sex and age on outcomes among HIV-2-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in West Africa. AIDS Lond Engl 2016;30:2707–14. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000001232
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. Giles ML, Achhra AC, Abraham AG, et al. Sex-based differences in antiretroviral therapy initiation, switching and treatment interruptions: global overview from the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). J Int AIDS Soc 2018;21:e25149. doi:10.1002/jia2.25149
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. Haas AD, Keiser O, Balestre E, et al. Monitoring and switching of first-line antiretroviral therapy in adult treatment cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa: Collaborative analysis. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e271–e278. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00087-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. Chimbetete C, Katzenstein D, Shamu T, et al. HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Third-Line Therapy Outcomes in Patients Failing Second-Line Therapy in Zimbabwe. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;5:1–8. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. Wools-Kaloustian K, Marete I, Ayaya S, et al. Time to First-Line ART Failure and Time to Second-Line ART Switch in the IeDEA Pediatric Cohort. Jaids-J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018;78:221–30. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001667
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. Charpentier C, Eholié S, Anglaret X, et al. Genotypic resistance profiles of HIV-2-treated patients in West Africa. AIDS Lond Engl 2014;28:1161–9. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000244
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. Kiragga AN, Lok JJ, Musick BS, et al. CD4 trajectory adjusting for dropout among HIV-positive patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in an East African HIV care centre. J Int AIDS Soc 2014;17:18957. doi:10.7448/IAS.17.1.18957
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. Geng EH, Neilands TB, Thièbaut R, et al. CD41 T cell recovery during suppression of HIV replication: an international comparison of the immunological efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in North America, Asia and Africa. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:251–63. doi:10.1093/ije/dyu271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. Technau K-G, Schomaker M, Kuhn L, et al. Virologic response in children treated with abacavir-compared with stavudine-based antiretroviral treatment: a South African multi-cohort analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014;33:617–22. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000000222
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Tenthani L, Haas AD, Tweya H, et al. Retention in care under universal antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women (‘Option B+’) in Malawi. AIDS 2014;28:589–598 Keywords:
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) Global Cohort Collaboration, Slogrove AL, Schomaker M, et al. The epidemiology of adolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV: A cross-region global cohort analysis. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002514. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Kariminia A, Law M, Davies M, et al. Mortality and losses to follow-up among adolescents living with HIV in the Ie DEA global cohort collaboration. J Int AIDS Soc 2018;21:e25215. doi:10.1002/jia2.25215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Rosen S, Fox MP, Gill CJ. Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoSMed 2007;4:e298.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    Brinkhof Mwgwmwg, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Egger M. Mortality of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2009;4:e5790. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Geng EH, Odeny TA, Lyamuya RE, et al. Estimation of mortality among HIV-infected people on antiretroviral treatment in east Africa: a sampling based approach in an observational, multisite, cohort study. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e107–16. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00002-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. An M-W, Frangakis CE, Yiannoutsos CT. Choosing profile double-sampling designs for survival estimation with application to President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief evaluation. Stat Med 2014;33:2017–29. doi:10.1002/sim.6087
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. Schomaker M, Gsponer T, Estill J, et al. Non-ignorable loss to follow-up: correcting mortality estimates based on additional outcome ascertainment. Stat Med 2014;33:129–142. doi:10.1002/sim.5912
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. Brinkhof MWG, Spycher BD, Yiannoutsos C, et al. Adjusting mortality for loss to follow-up: Analysis of five art programmes in sub-saharan africa. PLoS ONE 2010;5:3–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014149
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. Egger M, Spycher BD, Sidle J, et al. Correcting mortality for loss to follow-up: a nomogram applied to antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1000390. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000390
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. Yiannoutsos CT, Johnson LF, Boulle A, et al. Estimated mortality of adult HIV-infected patients starting treatment with combination antiretroviral therapy. Sex Transm Infect 2012;88 Suppl 2:i33.—-43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Haas AD, Zaniewski E, Anderegg N, et al. Retention and mortality on antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: collaborative analyses of HIV treatment programmes. J Int AIDS Soc 2018;21:e25084. doi:10.1002/jia2.25084
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Hector J, Vinikoor M, Chilengi R, et al. No Impact of Hepatitis B Virus Infection on Early Mortality Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients in Southern Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:1310–1311. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. Wandeler G, Mulenga L, Hobbins M, et al. Absence of Active Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinics in Zambia and Mozambique. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016;3:ofw049. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofw049
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. Jaquet A, Wandeler G, Nouaman M, et al. Alcohol use, viral hepatitis and liver fibrosis among HIV-positive persons in West Africa: A cross-sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc 2017;20:21424. doi:10.7448/IAS.20.1.21424
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    Rohner E, Bütikofer L, Schmidlin K, et al. Cervical cancer risk in women living with HIV across four continents: A multicohort study: Regional cervical cancer risk in HIV-positive women. Int J Cancer Published Online First: 19 June 2019. doi:10.1002/ijc.32260
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. Brown SA, Abbas S, Davies M-A, et al. Brief Report: Pediatric Cancer Burden and Treatment Resources Within the Pediatric IeDEA Consortium. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999 2017;76:60–4. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001453
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. Semeere A, Wenger M, Busakhala N, et al. A prospective ascertainment of cancer incidence in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Kaposi sarcoma. Cancer Med 2016;5:914–28. doi:10.1002/cam4.618
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. Carlucci JG, Blevins Peratikos M, Kipp AM, et al. Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes Among HIV/TB-Coinfected Children in the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) Network. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999 2017;75:156–63. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Zurcher K, Ballif M, Fenner L, et al. Drug susceptibility testing and mortality in patients treated for tuberculosis in high-burden countries: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19:298–307. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30673-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. Gygli SM, Keller PM, Ballif M, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing for Drug Resistance Profile Prediction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63:e02175–18. doi:10.1128/AAC.02175-18
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. Zürcher K, Ballif M, Kiertiburanakul S, et al. Diagnosis and clinical outcomes of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in antiretroviral therapy programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a multicohort study. J Int AIDS Soc 2019;22:e25392. doi:10.1002/jia2.25392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. Mulenga L, Musonda P, Mwango A, et al. Effect of baseline renal function on tenofovir-containing antiretroviral therapy outcomes in Zambia. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 2014;58:1473–80. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Rohner E, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, et al. Kaposi Sarcoma Risk in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents on Combination Antiretroviral Therapy From Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, and Asia. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:ciw519. doi:10.1093/cid/ciw519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Chêne G, Phillips A, Costagliola D, et al. Cohort profile: Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) in EuroCoord. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:797. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Tymejczyk O, Brazier E, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Changes in rapid HIV treatment initiation after national “treat all” policy adoption in 6 sub-Saharan African countries: Regression discontinuity analysis. PLOS Med 2019;16:e1002822. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Yotebieng M, Brazier E, Addison D, et al. Research priorities to inform “Treat All” policy implementation for people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a consensus statement from the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (Ie DEA). J Int AIDS Soc 2019;22:e25218. doi:10.1002/jia2.25218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Nash D, Yotebieng M, Sohn AH. Treating all people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a new era calling for new approaches. J Virus Erad 2018;4:1–4.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    Enane LA, Davies M-A, Leroy V, et al. Traversing the cascade: urgent research priorities for implementing the “treat all” strategy for children and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. J Virus Erad 2018;4:40–46.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    Abuogi LL, Humphrey JM, Mpody C, et al. Achieving UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets for pregnant and postpartum women in sub-Saharan Africa: progress, gaps and research needs. J Virus Erad 2018;4:33–9.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    Lancaster KE, Hetrick A, Jaquet A, et al. Substance use and universal access to HIV testing and treatment in sub-Saharan Africa: implications and research priorities. J Virus Erad 2018;4:26–32.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    de Waal R, Lessells R, Hauser A, et al. HIV drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: public health questions and the potential role of real-world data and mathematical modelling. J Virus Erad 2018;4:55–8.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    Panayidou K, Davies M-A, Anderegg N, et al. Global temporal changes in the proportion of children with advanced disease at the start of combination antiretroviral therapy in an era of changing criteria for treatment initiation. J Int AIDS Soc 2018;21:e25200. doi:10.1002/jia2.25200
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Anderegg N, Panayidou K, Abo Y, et al. Global Trends in CD4 Cell Count at the Start of Antiretroviral Therapy: Collaborative Study of Treatment Programs. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:893–903. doi:10.1093/cid/cix915
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) Global Cohort Collaboration. Incidence of switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy and associated factors in children with HIV: an international cohort collaboration. Lancet HIV 2019;6:e105– 15. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30319-9
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
Posted October 29, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Cohort profile: The International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) in sub-Saharan Africa, 2012-2019
Frédérique Chammartin, Cam Ha Dao Ostinelli, Kathryn Anastos, Antoine Jaquet, Ellen Brazier, Steven Brown, François Dabis, Mary-Ann Davies, Stephany N Duda, Karen Malateste, Denis Nash, Kara K Wools-Kaloustian, Per M von Groote, Matthias Egger
medRxiv 19010231; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19010231
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area