Abstract
Background There is growing evidence that polygenic risk scores (PRS) can be used to identify individuals at high lifetime risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether they can also be used to stratify risk of subsequent events among those surviving a first CAD event remains uncertain.
Methods Using two subsamples of UK Biobank, defined at baseline as prevalent CAD (N=10,287) and without CAD (N=393,108), we evaluated associations between a CAD PRS and incident cardiovascular and fatal outcomes, during a median follow up of 7.8 years.
Results A 1 S.D. higher PRS was associated with increased risk of incident MI in participants without CAD (OR 1.33; 95% C.I. 1.29, 1.38), but the effect estimate was markedly attenuated in those with prevalent CAD (OR 1.15; 95% C.I. 1.06, 1.25); heterogeneity P =0.0012. Additionally, among prevalent CAD cases, we found evidence of an inverse association between the CAD PRS and risk of all-cause death (OR 0.91; 95% C.I. 0.85, 0.98) compared to those without CAD (OR 1.01; 95% C.I. 0.99, 1.03); heterogeneity P =0.0041. A similar inverse association was found for ischaemic stroke (Prevalent CAD (OR 0.78; 95% C.I. 0.67, 0.90); without CAD (OR 1.09; 95% C.I. 1.04, 1.15), heterogeneity P <0.001).
Conclusions Bias induced by case stratification and survival into UK Biobank may attenuate, or reverse, associations of polygenic risk scores derived from case-control studies or populations initially free of disease. Polygenic risk scores for subsequent events should be derived from new genome wide association studies conducted in patients with established disease.
Key messages
CAD PRS are positively associated with incident myocardial infarction risk amongst established CAD cases.
However, the effect size is attenuated compared to estimates from CAD-free populations.
CAD PRS are inversely associated with mortality and stroke risk amongst established CAD cases.
These associations may reflect index event bias induced by stratifying on case status.
Dedicated GWAS of coronary disease progression are required to improve prediction of subsequent event risk.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr Patel has received speaker fees and honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi and Bayer and research grant funding from Regeneron. Dr Asselbergs has received research funding from Regeneron, Pfizer and Sanofi. The other authors report no conflicts.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a British Heart Foundation Intermediate Fellowship (Dr Patel, grant number FS/14/76/30933). This research was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre; Dr Schmidt is funded by a British Heart Foundation grant number PG/18/5033837. Prof Hingorani is a National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator; Prof Asselbergs is supported by University College London Hospitals National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, European Union/European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking BigData@Heart grant n° 116074, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the ERA-NET Co-fund action N°01KL1802 (Druggable-MI-gene) jointly funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation and Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The funder(s) of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The summary statistics for the GWAS of all-cause mortality amongst CAD cases in UK Biobank conducted in this study will be made publicly available upon study publication.