Abstract
Concern for the well-being of medical professionals has increased considering the high rates of depression and suicidal ideation observed among medical students and residents. However, the causes of such psychological distress among health professionals are still unknown. One possibility is that such negative outcomes arise from individual differences in how clinicians respond to the emotional states of their patients: while some tend respond with empathy (feeling what others feel), others tend respond with compassion (caring about what others feel). The aim of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that empathy is related to higher levels of burnout and affective symptoms, while compassion is related to lower levels of these outcomes. We surveyed 464 undergraduate students and professionals in medicine (34.3%), psychology (47%) and nursing (18.8%), 79.7% female, with a median age of 23.3. The survey included the concern and perspective taking subscales from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI); empathy and behavioral contagion from the Empathy Index (EI); the depression, anxiety, and anger subscales from PROMIS; and the Medical Student Well-Being Index (MSWBI). Empathy was associated with higher symptoms of burnout, depression, anxiety and anger; while higher levels of compassion were associated with lower levels of these outcomes. Our findings provide new evidence that the well-being of medical professionals might be affected differently depending on socio-emotional traits relevant to emotional connection.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research report was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial Disclosures Romani-Sponchiado, Jordan, Stringaris and Salum report no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Role of the funding source This research report was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Ethics committee approval Authors complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of research participants and the Institutional Review Board of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) approved this study.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are available.
