Abstract
Importance Large regional variations in consumer satisfaction with private health insurance plans have been observed, but the factors driving this variation are unknown.
Objective To identify explanatory state-level and insurance family-level predictors of satsifaction with private health insurance.
Design Cross-sectional study examining regional and state variations in consumer health insurance plan satisfaction using National Committee for Quality Assurance data from 2015 to 2018, state-level health data and parent insurance family.
Setting US Population
Participants Privately insured individuals.
Exposure One of 2176 private health insurance plans.
Main Outcome Consumer satisfaction with the health insurance plan on a 0-5 scale.
RESULTS Consumer satisfaction with health insurance was consistently lowest in the West (p<0.0001). Lower private health insurance plan satisfaction was associated with the percentage of the population without a place of usual medical care, the percentage of the state population that is Hispanic, and the percentage of the population reporting any mental illness. Factors associated with increasing insurance satisfaction included higher healthcare spending per capita, a higher number of for-profit beds per capita, and an increased cancer death rate. Increased consumer satisfaction was associated with the Kaiser and Anthem insurance plan families.
Conclusions and Relevance State and insurer family factors are predictive of private health insurance plan satisfaction. Potentially modifiable factors include access to primary care, healthcare spending per capita, and numbers of for-profit hospital beds. This information will help consumers hold insurance providers accountable to provide higher quality and more desirable coverage and provide actionable items to improve health insurance satisfaction.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Grant Support: MM is supported by TL1TR002242. JAB is supported byT32 DK062708, PDRH is supported by R01 DK109302, R01 DK118154, and T32 DK062708.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Not Applicable
Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Grant Support: MM is supported by TL1TR002242. JAB is supported by T32 DK062708, PDRH is supported by R01 DK109302, R01 DK118154, and T32 DK062708.
Disclosures: All authors report no disclosures relevant to this manuscript.
Data Availability
All data used in this study are publicly available. All raw and processed data files, as well as code used for study analyses can be found at the link provided.
https://osf.io/xcbe4/?view_only=06dc35b2496d44f28a2dea4e39bc9dbf
Abbreviations
- (ACA)
- Affordable Care Act
- (ANOVA)
- Analysis of Variance
- (HEDIS)
- Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set
- (KFF)
- Kaiser Family Foundation
- (MEPS)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
- (NCQA)
- National Committee for Quality Assurance’s
- (PMD)
- Primary Medical Doctor
- (UHF)
- United Health Foundation
- (VIF)
- Variance inflation factor