Abstract
Targeted vaccination policies can have a significant impact on the number of infections and deaths in an epidemic. However, optimising such policies is complicated and the resultant solution may be difficult to explain to policy-makers and to the public. The key novelty of this paper is a derivation of the leading order optimal vaccination policy under multi-group SIR (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered) dynamics in two different cases. Firstly, it considers the case of a small vulnerable subgroup in a population and shows that (in the asymptotic limit) it is optimal to vaccinate this group first, regardless of the properties of the other groups. Then, it considers the case of a small vaccine supply and transforms the optimal vaccination problem into a simple knapsack problem by linearising the final size equations. Both of these cases are then explored further through numerical examples which show that these solutions are also directly useful for realistic parameter values. Moreover, the findings of this paper give some general principles for optimal vaccination policies which will help policy-makers and the public to understand the reasoning behind optimal vaccination programs in more generic cases.
Author summary The COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated the importance of vaccination programs in preventing infections and deaths from an epidemic. A common feature of vaccination programs across the world has been a prioritisation of different groups within each country’s population, particularly those who are more vulnerable to the disease. Finding the best priority order is crucial, but may be complicated and difficult to justify to policy-makers and the public. In this paper, we consider two extreme cases where the best prioritisation order can be mathematically derived. Firstly, we consider the case of a population with a very small, very vulnerable group and show that this group should always be vaccinated first. Then, we consider the case of a small supply of vaccines and derive an equation which gives the best prioritisation order. Understanding these extreme cases is important, as it highlights general principles of optimal policies which will be useful when understanding the solution in more complicated settings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by an EPSRC DTP Studentship awarded to Matthew J. Penn.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* matthew.penn{at}st-annes.ox.ac.uk
Data Availability
The data and code underlying the results can be found at https://github.com/mpenn114/AsymptoticVaccination
Nomenclature
- inf
- The infimum of a set
- sup
- The supremum of a set
- O(ϵ)
- A function f (t; ϵ) which for sufficiently small ϵ is bounded by Kϵ for some constant K.
- o(ϵ)
- A function f (t; ϵ) which satisfies limϵ→0(f (t; ϵ)/ϵ) = 0.