Abstract
ABSTRACT
Bilateral cochlear implants (BI-CIs) or a CI for single-sided deafness (SSD; one normally functioning acoustic ear) can partially restore spatial-hearing abilities including sound localization and speech understanding when there are competing sounds. However for these populations, frequency information is not explicitly aligned across the ears, resulting in interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch. This diminishes spatial-hearing abilities because binaural encoding occurs in interaurally frequency-matched neurons. This study examined whether plasticity – the reorganization of central neural pathways over time – can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch. We hypothesized differential plasticity across two systems: none for binaural processing but adaptation toward the frequencies delivered by the specific electrodes for sequential pitch perception. Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 43 human subjects (20 BI-CI and 23 SSD-CI, both sexes) using interaural-time-difference (ITD) discrimination (simultaneous bilateral stimulation), place-pitch ranking (sequential bilateral stimulation), and physical electrode- location estimates from computed-tomography (CT) scans. On average, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26° insertion-angle mismatch), but relatively large SSD-CI mismatch, particularly at the apical end of the array (166° for an electrode tuned to 300 Hz, decreasing to 14° at 7000 Hz). ITD and CT measurements were in agreement, suggesting little binaural-system plasticity to mismatch. The pitch measurements did not agree with the binaural and CT measurements, suggesting plasticity for pitch encoding or procedural biases. The combined results show that binaural processing may be optimized by using CT-scan information, but not pitch measurements, to program the CI frequency allocation to reduce interaural place mismatch.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Placement of electrode arrays in users of cochlear implants (CIs; bionic auditory prostheses that partially restore hearing) does not align the frequency information to acoustic neural encoding across the ears. This interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch diminishes spatial hearing abilities. This study shows that for experienced adult CI users with two CIs or with one CI and one normal-hearing ear, the best possible binaural sensitivity occurs when the same cochlear location is stimulated in both ears. This means that binaural brainstem pathways do not experience “plasticity” to compensate for interaural place mismatch – i.e., they do not reorganize to respond to input from different cochlear places. Therefore, explicit correction of interaural place mismatch by a clinician is necessary to derive maximum spatial-hearing benefits.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this article was supported by the National Institute On Deafness And Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01 DC015798 (J.G.W.B. and M.J.G.) and R01 DC014037 (J.H.N.).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research was approved by the IRBs for Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and University of Maryland - College Park
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data were generated at Walter Reed National Military Center and the University of Maryland - College Park. The authors confirm that the derived data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
