Abstract
Rational the radiologic pulmonary inflammatory index (PII) may be used as early predictor of inflammation as laboratory assessments in COVID-19 cases. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological features between the cases of COVID-19 necessitating admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who did not, and to correlate the radiological pulmonary inflammation index (PII) with other inflammatory markers and outcome.
Patients and methods This study included 72 patients consecutively admitted with confirmed COVID-19. Their electronic records of were retrospectively revised and the demographic, clinical, laboratory (complete blood count, C reactive protein, D dimer and serum ferritin), HRCT data, pulmonary inflammation index (PII) and the outcomes of the patients (ICU admission, death, recovery, and referral) were analyzed.
Results They were 50/50% males/females, mean age was 47.1 ± 16.8 (median 47 years). During their stay, 15.3% necessitated ICU admittance, 49 (68%) cured and discharged, 9 cases referred and five cases (6.9%) died. The baseline lesions identified were ground glass opacification recognized in (93%), higher PII and >3 lobes affection were considerably recorded in those who required ICU admittance (P= 0.041 and 0.013). There were moderate positive correlations between PII with age (r=0.264, P=0.031) and other prognostic inflammatory indicators as ferritin (r=0.225, P=0.048), D Dimer (r=0.271, P=0.043) and serum creatinine.
Conclusions The use of PII together with clinical and laboratory data may be valuable in defining the inflammatory state of COVID-19. It was correlated with other inflammatory indices as D dimer, ferritin even before clinical deterioration. This may allow clinicians to avoid the progression of the illness and improve cure rates by proper early intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04479293 (secondry aim)
Funding Statement
none
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
18-2020/14 (Ministry of Health and Population)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
on request