Abstract
The antimicrobial resistance crisis has persisted despite broad attempts at intervention. Detailed studies of the population dynamics that lead to resistance could identify additional intervention points. An important driver of resistance in the most concerning antibiotic resistant pathogens can be selection imposed on bacterial populations that are not the intended target of antimicrobial therapy. Here we focus on the important nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium in a hospital system where resistance to daptomycin is evolving despite standard interventions. We hypothesized that the intravenous use of daptomycin generates off-target selection for resistance in transmissible gastrointestinal (carriage) populations of E. faecium. We performed a case-control study in which the daptomycin resistance of E. faecium isolated from rectal swabs from daptomycin-exposed patients was compared to a control group of patients exposed to linezolid, a drug with similar indications. In the daptomycin-exposed group, daptomycin resistance of E. faecium from the off-target population was on average 50% higher than resistance in the control group (n=428 independent E. faecium clones from 22 patients). There was also greater phenotypic diversity in daptomycin resistance within daptomycin-exposed patients. Multiple samples over time were available from a subset of patients, and these demonstrate wide variability in temporal dynamics, from long-term maintenance of resistance to rapid return to sensitivity after daptomycin treatment stopped. Our results demonstrate that off-target gastrointestinal populations rapidly respond to intravenous antibiotic exposure. Gastrointestinal populations are the source for faecal transmission and so can be the driver for hospital-wide population level increases in resistance. Focusing on the off-target evolutionary dynamics may offer novel avenues to slow the spread of antibiotic resistance.
Competing Interest Statement
A.F.R reports consulting with Foamix Inc and unrestricted grants from Merck, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that no competing interests exist.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by funding to AFR from Eberly College of Science and Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University and to RJW from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI143852 and K08 AI119182). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be made available upon publication of the manuscript. For access to data prior to publication contact the corresponding author.
