Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle mRNA therapeutics continue to be administered as the predominant therapeutic intervention to reduce COVID-19 disease pathogenesis. Quantifying the kinetics of the secondary immune response from subsequent doses beyond the primary series, and understanding how dose-dependent immune waning kinetics vary as a function of age, sex, and various comorbidities, remains an important question. We study anti-spike IgG waning kinetics in 152 individuals who received an mRNA-based primary series and a subset of 137 individuals who then received a booster dose. We find the booster dose elicits a 71-84% increase in the median Anti-S half life over that of the primary series. We find the Anti-S half life for both primary series and booster doses drops as a function of increased year of age. However, we stress that although chronological age continues to be a good proxy for vaccine-induced humoral waning, immunosenescence is likely not the mechanism, rather, more likely the mechanism is related to the presence of noncommunicable diseases, which also accumulate with age, that affect immune regulation. We are able to independently reproduce recent observations that those with pre-existing asthma exhibit a stronger primary series humoral response to vaccination than compared to those that do not, and further find this result is sustained for the booster dose. Finally, via a single-variate KruskalWallis Test we find no difference between male and female decay kinetics, however, a multivariate approach utilizing Lasso regression for feature selection reveals a statistically significant (p-value<1×10−3), albeit small, bias in favour of longer-lasting humoral immunity amongst males.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
CSK acknowledges NSERC postdoctoral funding. This study was funded by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work involves human subject data solely used from existing public (and previously published) data sets. Ethics committee/IRB of York University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used for this work was acquired through a COVID-19 Immunity Task Force Grant. Requisitions to access the data must be made through the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force.