Abstract
Background Surgical resection offers survival benefits in patients with diffuse low-grade glioma (DLGG) but its association with functional outcomes is uncertain. This systematic review assessed functional outcomes associated with extent of resection (EoR) in adults with DLGG.
Methods We searched Medline, Embase and CENTRAL on the 19th of February 2021 for observational studies reporting functional outcomes after surgical resection for patients aged ≥18 years with a new diagnosis of supratentorial DLGG according to any World Health Organization classification of primary brain tumors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) informed our risk of bias assessments. The proportion of patients returning to work within 12 months entered a random-effects meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021238387.
Results There were seven eligible moderate to high-quality (NOS >6) observational studies identified from 1,183 records involving 234 patients with DLGG. Functional outcomes reported included neurocognition (n=2 studies), performance status (n=3), quality of life (QoL) (n=1) and return to work (n=6). The proportion of patients who returned to work within 12 months of surgery was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50-96%, I-squared=38%, 5 studies) for gross total resection, 66% (95% CI 14-96%, I2=57%, 5 studies) for subtotal resection, and 31% (95% CI 4-82%, I2= 0%, 4 studies) for partial resection. There was insufficient data on other functional outcomes for quantitative synthesis.
Conclusion A higher proportion of DLGG patients returned to work following gross total resection compared with those who had a subtotal or partial resection. Further studies with standardized assessments can clarify the association between EoR and different functional outcomes.
Importance of the Study The association between lower residual tumor volume and better survival in people with diffuse low-grade glioma (DLGG) has driven surgical research into maximizing resection. However, innovative interventions should be evaluated against both oncological outcomes and functional outcomes. This systematic review included all studies reporting post-operative functional outcomes stratified by the extent of resection in people aged ≥18 years with DLGG. Two studies reported neurocognition, three reported performance status, one reported quality of life, and six reported return-to-work. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a higher proportion of patients returning to work within 12 months for those who had gross total resection (84%) compared to subtotal (66%) and partial (31%) resections. Our results suggest that increased EoR may be associated with return-to-work, but direct comparative studies should verify this finding and could examine other important functional outcomes.
Key Points
Seven studies reported functional outcomes stratified by EoR in DLGG patients.
Return-to-work (RTW) was the most reported functional outcome.
84% undergoing GTR of DLGG RTW within 12 months compared to STR (66%) or PR (31%).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=238387
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This research received no specific funding from any agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit domains. MTCP was supported by a Cancer Research UK Brain Tumour Centre of Excellence Award (C157/A27589).
Conflict of Interest: We have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding the materials, methods or products referred to in this submission. We have no financial disclosures.
Authorship: ME: conceptualization, manuscript draft, manuscript editing, project administration, investigation, formal analysis; EB: investigation, manuscript review; JPL: conceptualization, manuscript review & editing, supervision. SL: manuscript review & editing, supervision; MTCP: manuscript review & editing, supervision, formal analysis.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors