Abstract
Background In the United States, mass shootings can be regarded as a public health issue due to its ubiquitous and public nature. A systematic review of the literature with adoption of the social ecological model for interpretation of the evidence can help inform relevant stakeholders and the public regarding the coherence between proposed gun control legislations and the body of empirical evidence.
Aims To conduct a systematic review of factors associated with: 1) perpetration of mass shooting events, and; 2) injuries and fatalities at mass shooting events.
Material and Methods The author conducted a search of the literatures on PubMed using the term “mass shooting”, filtering manuscripts from 2017 to 2022. The author included only articles in peer-reviewed academic journals with primary data collection for the review.
Results The author reviewed 36 of the 336 articles initially found from a search on PubMed. All but two studies focused on mass shootings in the United States. Factors associated with perpetration of mass shootings included having mental illness and experience of acute life stressors (intra-personal), relationship issues with family and friends (inter-personal), gun ownership and access (community), permissive firearm laws or lack of gun control (policy). Factors associated with injuries and fatalities at mass shootings included use of semi-automatic rifles (intrapersonal), targeting women (interpersonal), presence of armed officers at schools (organizational), and lack of gun control measures (policy).
Conclusion The author found that easy access to high-power firearms and lack of gun control were associated with both mass shooting perpetration and casualty. However, caveats including a limited time frame, limited sources of publications, and subjectivity in building the model should be considered in the interpretation of the study findings.
INTRODUCTION
On 14 May 2022, an 18-year-old male entered Tops Friendly Markets supermarket in the city of Buffalo, New York, USA, and opened fire with a Bushmaster AR-15 style semi-automatic rifle and killed 10 persons, apparently motivated by white supremacy (McKinley et al., 2022). Ten days later, another 18-year-old male entered Robb Elementary School in the city of Uvalde, Texas, USA, and opened fire with a Daniel Defense AR-15 style semi-automatic rifle and killed 19 schoolchildren and 2 teachers (Pilkington, 2022). These incidents are known as mass shootings, and are typically defined as incidents of gun violence not related to armed conflicts or domestic violence that resulted in three or more casualties (injuries or deaths), not including the perpetrator(s). Although mass shootings are not limited to any particular country, the United States is the only country in the OECD where public mass shootings occur every single year, and account for over 70% of all mass shootings in high-income countries (Silva, 2022). Furthermore, mass shootings in the United States tend to happen in public places. For example, the deadliest incident was the Las Vegas shooting in which a 64-year-old male in possession of 24 rifles opened fire on Route 91 Harvest country music festival attendees from his hotel room window and killed 58 people and injured more than 500 persons(Keneally, 2019).
Considering that gun manufacturing and import has risen dramatically in the past decade (Bump 2022) and that civilian firearm ownership is currently the highest in the world at 120 firearms per 100 residents (Karp, 2018), one can argue that there is no population sub-group that is invincible from gun violence and mass shootings. Thus, mass shootings (and, by extension, gun violence) should be regarded as a public health issue in the United States. As a public health issue, mass shooting prevention efforts thus should entail both primary prevention (i.e., prevention of perpetration of mass shootings) and secondary prevention (i.e., minimization of casualties – injuries and deaths – at mass shooting events). Using the lens of public health, perpetration and casualties of mass shootings should be regarded not only as attributable to the perpetrator’s own characteristics, but also to social and environmental factors. Thus, the social ecological model for health behaviors (McLeroy et al., 1988) is potentially useful for reviewing the determinants of mass shootings, which can help relevant stakeholders consider the phenomenon in a more comprehensive manner.
In response to the incidents in Uvalde and the surge in frequency of mass shootings, US legislators have made a bipartisan agreement on federal-level gun control (Williams, 2022). A systematic review on determinants and casualties of mass shootings with interpretation using the social ecological model can potentially help inform relevant stakeholders and the public with regard to the coherence between proposed gun control legislations and the body of empirical evidence, and whether there are additional determinants of mass shootings that should be considered in future agendas. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of factors associated with: 1) perpetration of mass shooting events, and; 2) injuries and fatalities at mass shooting events.
METHODS
The author conducted a search of the literature on PubMed Central (PMC) on 2 June 2022. Searches were limited to articles published in English from 1 January 2017 to the date of the search. The author used only one search term (“mass shooting”). The author decided to use 2017 as the starting year in an arbitrary manner, as it was the year with the deadliest mass shooting in US history occurred.
The author then excluded duplicates, screened the title of searched articles, excluded articles with no abstract or full text available, and then individually assessed each article for eligibility to review in full. The process and number of publications excluded in each step can be found in Figure 1. The author then reviewed the content of the eligible articles and summarized the findings, assigning a unique ID to each article for ease of reference during interpretation and summary.
The author then applied the social ecological model (McLeroy et al., 1988) to identify factors associated with perpetration, injuries, and fatalities of mass shooting events, with separate analyses for factors associated with perpetration of mass shooting events, and factors associated with casualties (injuries and fatalities) of mass shooting events. This systematic review did not involve any data collection from human subjects.
RESULTS
Study flow and characteristics of included studies
The author initially found 336 articles from a search on PubMed, 1 article was a duplicate and thus removed (Figure 1). The author screened the title of the remaining 335 articles and excluded 153 articles that did not contain the word “shoot*”, “firearm*”, or “gun*” in the title. The author then attempted to retrieve the remaining 182 articles, 12 of which did not have an abstract or full text available. The author assessed the remaining 170 articles for eligibility, and excluded 134 articles for varying reasons, and included 36 research articles in the review and assessment with social ecological model.
All but two of the articles reviewed focused on mass shootings in the United States: one article analyzed non-war mass murders worldwide (including those not involving firearms), another article examined Australian mass shooting incidents and offenders from 1964 to 2014. All articles were ecological, cross-sectional, or panel studies. One study that described itself as a “cohort study” did not follow a defined cohort, but rather examined the location of mass shootings relative to schools and places frequented by children.
Factors associated with perpetration of mass shooting
Intrapersonal factors associated with mass shootings included having mental illness and experience of acute life stressor (Table 2). A number of psychological and behavioral issues seemed to also be common among mass shootings, including interest in past mass killings, self-estrangement, online radicalization, and gun ownership. At the interpersonal level, perpetrators of mass shooters tended to have relationship issues and experienced estrangement from family, friends, and classmates. Surprisingly, a study found that mass shooters were less likely to be single and more likely to have children or be separated or divorced. Household-level gun ownership was also positively associated with perpetration of mass shootings.
At the community level, gun ownership, access to assault weapons and ammunition were all positively associated with perpetration of mass shooting. Other community-level factors included the presence of a culture of mass shooting and online media coverage of mass shooting. Contexts including time, place, and demographics were also associated with perpetration of mass shootings. Mass shootings have become more common in the 2010s compared to the 2000s and the 1990s, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, during major public holidays, and in hotter seasons. Mass shootings were more common in urban areas, generally occurred within one mile of a school or places of interest frequented by children, and more common in areas with higher income inequality and higher population density. However, mass shootings were less common in places with higher population median age, and in states with higher number of psychiatric hospitals. At the policy level, permissive state firearm laws were either neutral or positively associated with perpetration of mass shooting. On the other hand, gun control measures (background check, permit requirement, Federal Assault Weapons Ban, and large-capacity magazine ban) were all associated with lower perpetration of mass shootings. Other measures such as emergency protection order (ERPO) and mental health expenditures per capita also showed a preventive relationship with perpetration of mass shootings.
Factors associated with mass shooting injuries and fatalities
At the intrapersonal and interpersonal levels, firearm characteristics were associated with injuries and fatalities. Although handguns were the most common type of firearm used in mass shootings, shootings that involved semi-automatic or automatic firearms had higher mean fatality than shootings that involved only handguns. Number of casualties at mass shootings was also positively associated with use of two or more firearms. Gender-based mass shooters who targeted women, and ideologically-motivated shooters, tended to be more patient and lethal. Disgruntled employees who perpetrated mass shootings generally had little or no time to plan and tended to be less lethal. School shooters who were older (aged 18-20 years) harmed more persons in each attack than school-aged shooters. Mass shootings related to domestic violence were more lethal than mass shootings not related to domestic violence. At the organizational and community levels, most data pertained to school shootings. Mass shootings at high school tended to have more casualties than those perpetrated at elementary or middle schools. Shooting injuries and fatalities were also more common at schools with students eligible for reduced-price lunch. On the other hand, presence of armed officer at school either had no association with casualties at mass shooting events, or was associated with higher (not lower) casualties. Mass shootings were less common in urban schools and more common in schools with a Caucasian-majority student body. At the policy level, gun control measures including Federal Assault Weapons Ban and large-capacity magazine ban were associated with lower fatality and nonfatal injuries at mass shootings.
DISCUSSION
In this study, the author systematically reviewed factors associated with perpetration of mass shooting events, and factors associated with injuries and fatalities at mass shooting events. The author then identified intrapersonal, interpersonal, organization, community, and policy factors associated with perpetration and casualties of mass shootings events. The findings of this study should be of interest to stakeholders, particularly during this period where the frequency of event is ever-increasing in the United States. As the author used the social ecological model to describe the factors associated with the outcomes, the discussion of the study findings should also be disaggregated according to the levels of the model.
Intrapersonal level
History of mental illness and lack of or discontinuation of treatment were commonly-mentioned factors. Other reports mentioned signs of devolution of the shooter’s behaviors to gravitate towards mass shootings, until finally firearms were acquired and the mass shooting event occurred. The event would be more fatal had it involved any type of semi-automatic firearm or shotgun. However, one must refrain from using these findings to stigmatize those with mental illnesses or estrangement behaviors, as practically all of nearly 53 million US adults with mental illness (National Institute of Mental Health, 2022) do not have plan to harm others, especially not on a massive scale. The study findings should only be used as an attempt to understand the phenomenon in a complete manner.
Interpersonal level
Problems in interpersonal relationship seemed to be a recurring theme for perpetration of mass shootings. In particular, family problems (including domestic violence, separation or divorce) and rejection from others were common among mass shooters. Domestic violence was also associated with lethality of mass shootings. Considering that mental health problems are associated with family/relationship issues (Silver & Silva, 2022), and that family/relationship issues can lead to mental health problems (Gibb et al., 2011), it is not possible to ascertain whether a variable was a risk factor or the pathway variable between another risk factor and the outcomes.
Organization level
Perpetration of mass shooting was associated with work or school problem. Further investigation is recommended on the extent that management practice or policy of the workplace or the school contributed to work or school problem, which in turn contributed to the perpetration of mass shooting. Concerningly, presence of armed police officers at schools had an opposite effect to what was intended: no reduction or actual increase in casualties at school shooting events. Data from another source (Justice Policy Institute, 2021) showed that weapons-related arrests accounted for only 0.1% to 0.2% of all arrests made by school resource officers (school police officers), and the majority were for disorderly conduct that funneled students unnecessarily into the juvenile justice system. Given the consistency of the evidence, relevant stakeholders should reconsider the presence of armed guards or police officers in schools.
Community level
Factors at the community level appeared coherent and complementary to the factors identified at other levels. There were variations in mass shooting with regards to time, place, and demographics of the shooting’s location. Associations between perpetration and casualties of mass shootings were also clear: states with higher gun ownership and access to assault weapons and ammunition had higher incidents of mass shootings than states that were less permissive of firearms. With such clear patterns of association, local government and community leaders should consider increasing gun control where possible.
Policy level
There were clear patterns of association between gun control measures and perpetration, injuries, and fatalities of mass shootings. In particular, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (FAWB) and large-capacity magazine ban had negative associations with both perpetration and casualties of mass shootings. Considering that more lethal shootings tended to involve the use of assault weapons with higher number of ammunitions (Brown & Goodin, 2018; Livingston et al., 2019), these policies seemed to directly address these issues. Similarly, other preventive measures such as the emergency protection order and mental health expenditures were also negatively associated with perpetration of mass shootings, suggesting that other measures should also be adopted concurrently with gun control.
A number of limitations should be considered in the findings of this study. Firstly, this review was written in relative haste in response to high-profile incidents of mass shootings in the United States and included studies published on PubMed since 2017, an arbitrary time frame. More comprehensive systematic reviews could have yielded different results. Secondly, the level in the social ecological model to which each potential determinant belonged was relatively subjective and based on the author’s own judgement. Findings from other authors could have been different from those presented by the author.
CONCLUSION
In this study, the author reviewed factors associated with perpetration and casualty of mass shootings using the social ecological model. Although the author identified factors at various levels, easy access to high-power firearms and lack of gun control were associated with both mass shooting perpetration and casualty. Caveats including a limited time frame, limited sources of publications, and subjectivity in building social ecological model should be considered in the interpretation of the study findings.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors