Abstract
Background Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and predict poorer outcomes. Reward processing dysfunction is a candidate mechanism for the development of psychiatric symptoms including depression and impulse control disorders (ICD). We aimed to determine whether reward processing is impaired in PD and its relationship with neuropsychiatric syndromes and dopamine replacement therapy.
Methods The Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo databases were searched for articles published up to November 5th, 2020. Studies reporting reward processing task performance by PD patients and healthy controls were included. Summary statistics comparing reward processing between groups were converted to standardized mean difference (SMD) scores and meta-analysed using a random effects model.
Results We identified 55 studies containing 2578 participants (1,638 PD and 940 healthy controls). Studies assessing three subcomponent categories of reward processing tasks were included: Option Valuation (n=12), Reinforcement Learning (n=37) and Reward Response Vigour (n=6). Across all studies, PD patients on medication exhibited a small-to-medium impairment versus healthy controls (SMD=0.34; 95%CI 0.14-0.53), with greater impairments observed off dopaminergic medication in within-subjects designs (SMD=0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.57). Within-subjects subcomponent analysis revealed impaired processing off medication on Option Valuation (SMD=0.57, 95%CI 0.39-0.75) and Reward Response Vigour (SMD=0.36, 95%CI 0.13-0.59) tasks. However, the opposite applied for Reinforcement Learning, which relative to healthy controls was impaired on-medication (SMD=0.45, 95%CI 0.25-0.65) but not off-medication (SMD=0.28, 95%CI -0.03-0.59). ICD was the only neuropsychiatric syndrome with sufficient studies (n=13) for meta-analysis, but no significant impairment was identified compared to non-ICD patients (SMD=-0.02, 95%CI -0.43-0.39).
Conclusion Reward processing disruption in PD differs according to subcomponent and dopamine medication state and warrants further study as a potential treatment target and mechanism underlying associated neuropsychiatric syndromes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
HC is supported by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Training Fellowship.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.