Abstract
The use of drones for the triage of victims in mass-casualty incidents has recently emerged as a promising technology. However, there is not a triage system really adapted to a remote usage. The objective of our study was to develop a remote triage procedure using drones. The research was performed in three stages: literature review, development of a remote triage algorithm using drones and evaluation of the algorithm by experts. A qualitative synthesis and the calculation of content validity ratios were done to achieve the Aerial Remote Triage System. The system assesses first major bleeding, second walking, third conscious (awake) and fourth sign of life; and classify the victims inside priority categories: priority 1 (red), priority 2 (yellow), priority 3 (green) and priority * (violet). It includes the possibility to indicate save-living interventions to victims and bystanders, like the compression of bleeding injuries or the recovery position. The Aerial Remote Triage System is valid in complex health emergencies when it is difficult or impossible an immediate access to the scene due to physical, chemical or biological risks. It can be useful to know vital information about the emergencies.
Competing Interest Statement
SCA and JMLH are founders of Emergency Medical Drones cooperative company
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of University of Jaen made the exemption from ethical approval for this study, because no personal data were recorded.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data would be provided upon request