Abstract
We reviewed the association between seasonal influenza vaccination and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or complicated illness or poor outcome (e.g. severe disease, need for hospitalization or ventilatory support, or death) among COVID-19 patients. None of the studies that were reviewed (n=12) found a significant increase in the risk of infection or in the illness severity or lethality, while some reported significantly inverse associations. Our findings support measures aimed at raising influenza vaccination coverage in the coming months.
Manuscript text
There has been an important debate recently in the media and scientific community and in the media about the relationship between influenza vaccination and COVID-19. Influenza and COVID-19 are respiratory viral illnesses that may be clinically indistinguishable and tend to be life-threatening in largely overlapping population subgroups (e.g. the elderly and people suffering from chronic health conditions). Moreover, being respiratory virus illnesses, their peak of activity may occur in the same period of the year (i.e. winter months in temperate countries). Based on the above considerations, most health professionals have advocated in favour of strengthening influenza vaccination programmes, arguing that rising vaccine coverage could help improve COVID-19 patient management by allowing easier differential diagnosis and reducing the overload of the healthcare systems, particularly intensive care units (ICUs) [1]. Public health decisions should be based as much as possible on the best available evidence regarding any benefits and drawbacks that the proposed intervention may be expected to entail, and since the influenza season is fast approaching in the northern hemisphere, a literature review on this topic is urgently needed. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the articles that examined whether influenza vaccination affects the risk of being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and the risk of complicated illness or poor outcome (e.g. severe disease, need for hospitalization or ventilatory support, or death) among COVID-19 patients.
The literature search was performed on 31 August, 2020, by interrogating the MEDLINE, Embase and medRxiv databases for both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed articles using the following string: ‘SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID’ AND ‘influenza OR flu AND ‘vaccin*’. All identified articles were first independently screened by two researchers (MDR and SC) based on their title, and any considered as potentially eligible for inclusion by either researcher was then obtained and read in full text. Any disagreement on the eligibility of a given article was resolved by consensus. The literature search was then extended to the reference lists of all the articles that were obtained in full copy (regardless of their final inclusion in the review). To be eligible for inclusion, an article had to be an original report based on individual-level data; studies relying on aggregated data (e.g. ecological studies reporting correlations [2-3]) were not retained because of their higher proneness to bias and confounding. Letters and commentaries with no original data were discarded as well.
The literature search identified 1,619 non-duplicate entries, of which 1,461 were excluded based on their title. The remaining 158 articles were read in full copy, and an additional article was identified in their reference lists. Finally, twelve independent articles met all inclusion criteria and were retained (Figure 1). Seven articles [6-12] focused on the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 1): these encompassed a total of 242,323 subjects, of which 56.6% were contributed by Pawlowski et al. [11] and 32.6% by Vila-Córcoles A et al. [12]. Most studies were based on subjects from the general population, except the two smallest studies, which included 203 firefighters and paramedics from the USA [7], and 640 liver transplant patients from Italy [8]. The laboratory diagnostic method varied across studies, with (RT-)PCR being used in three of them. No statistical adjustment was made in four studies: Aziz et al. [6] and Donato et al. [8] found no significant association, while COVID-19 cases were significantly less likely to be vaccinated than test-negative subjects in the studies by Jehi et al. [9] (that separately reported on two independent cohorts) and Caban Martinez et al. [7]. Three studies reported measures of association adjusted by age, gender, comorbidities, and other potential confounders, all of which found that influenza vaccinees were significantly less likely to get infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus than non-vaccinees. Noale et al. [10] found a reduced risk among subjects aged less than 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.74-0.98, p=0.024; the OR among those aged ≥65 years was of similar magnitude, 0.87, but not statistically significant, p=0.483). On the contrary, the association was stronger in the ≥65 years subgroup (relative risk 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.89, p<0.01) in the study by Pawlowski et al. [11], while achieving statistical significance (p<0.03) in the whole population as well. Finally, a statistically significant inverse association (hazard ratio 0.63, 95%CI 0.43-0.92, p=0.015) emerged among adults aged ≥50 years enrolled in the study by Vila-Córcoles et al. [12].
Five articles [5,13-16] reported on the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of severe illness and/or death among COVID-19 patients (Table 2). The total number of patients was 111,820 of which the majority (82.9%) were contributed by Fink et al. [5]. The latter was the only study encompassing a minority (16%) of non-laboratory-confirmed patients. Jehi et al. [13] and Murillo-Zamora et al. [14] found that the likelihood of being vaccinated against influenza was significantly (p<0.001) or, respectively, nearly significantly (p=0.073) lower among patients who required to be hospitalized compared to those who did not. Likewise, Fink et al. [5] reported a significantly lower odds of requiring intensive care or respiratory support among influenza vaccinees vs. non-vaccinees. The latter study also found that vaccinated COVID-19 patients were at significantly reduced risk of dying compared to non-vaccinated ones (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.75-0.89, p<0.01), but this finding was not confirmed in the studies by Ortiz-Prado et al. [15] and Poblador-Plou et al. [16].
Influenza epidemics recur every year and the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the upcoming months may expose healthcare systems to a severe risk of resources scarcity. Influenza vaccination is the cornerstone of influenza prevention, thus attaining higher vaccine coverage has been widely acknowledged as a public health priority [17]. Concerns about a possible association between influenza vaccination and the risk of coronavirus infection were raised based on the Wolff’s paper, which examined endemic coronaviruses circulating in the USA in the 2017-18 season, much earlier the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus [18]. After reviewing the existing literature on the topic, we can safely conclude that influenza vaccination is unlikely to be associated with an increase in SARS-CoV-2 risk of infection or with COVID-19 severity and the risk of associated death. In fact, most reviewed studies detected an inverse relation, which was unexpected and even disconcerting given that influenza vaccines are not designed to protect from SARS-CoV-2. It must be acknowledged, however, that all reviewed studies are retrospective and observational in nature, thus likely to be not devoid of bias, which should warn against drawing premature conclusions regarding this finding. In conclusion, our review finds that based on our knowledge (up to the end of August 2020), public health measures aimed at raising the influenza vaccine coverage should be encouraged and there is no evidence to suggest that this would have a negative impact on populations in terms of SARS-CoV-2 related infections, illness or deaths.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the MEDLINE, Embase and medRxiv databases.
Funding
There was no funding for this manuscript.