Abstract
Objective To assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids on outcomes of patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods We used routine care data from 51 hospitals in France and Luxembourg to assess the effectiveness of corticosteroids at 0.8 mg/kg/day eq. prednisone (CTC group) vs standard of care (no-CTC group) among patients ≤ 80 years old with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring oxygen without mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was intubation or death at Day 28. Baseline characteristics of patients were balanced using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Results Among the 891 patients included in the analysis, 203 were assigned to the CTC group. At day 28, corticosteroids did not reduce the rate of the primary outcome (wHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.39) nor the cumulative death rate (wHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.98). Corticosteroids significantly reduced the rate of the primary outcome for patients requiring oxygen ≥ at 3L/min (wHR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.85) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≥ 100mg/L (wHR 0.44, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.85). We found a higher number of hyperglycaemia events among patients who received corticosteroids, but number of infections were similar across the two groups.
Conclusions We found no association between the use of corticosteroids and intubation or death in the broad population of patients ≤80 years old with COVID-19 hospitalized in non-ICU settings. However, the treatment was beneficial for patients with ≥ 3L/min oxygen or CRP ≥ 100mg/L at baseline. These data support the need to confirm the right timing of corticosteroids for patients with mild COVID.
Short summary We assessed the effectiveness of corticosteroids among patients ≤ 80 years old with COVID-19, in non-ICU settings. Our results support the use of corticosteroids for patients receiving oxygen at ≥3L/min or with a C-reactive protein ≥ 100mg/L at baseline.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No specific funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. It received approval by the IRB of the Henri-Mondor Hospital (AP-HP), France (number: 00011558) and by the National ethics committee of Luxembourg (number: 0620-101).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are available on request.