Abstract
Diurnal oscillations in human cardiac electrophysiology are thought to be under the control of the endogenous circadian clock. The incidence of arrhythmic events in patients with Long QT syndrome (LQTS) varies diurnally. The diurnal variation in QT interval has previously been identified as a potential for error in clinical trials which utilise ECG measurement. We performed a systematic review of clinical trials for LQTS to identify practice around specification of timing information for point electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements, analysis of continual ECG recordings ≥24 hours, and drug delivery. Despite guidelines having been issued around the analysis of 24-hour ECG recordings, we identify a lack of usage of detailed time of day information in trial design for LQTS studies, which has the potential to affect the interpretation of the results of drug trials. We identify that, in contrast, clinical trials for QT prolonging drugs demonstrate increased incorporation of time of day information of both QT analysis and drug dosing. We provide a visual portal to allow trial designers and clinicians to better understand timing of common cardiac-targeting drugs, and to bear this concept in mind in the design of future clinical trials.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a generous grant from the Newnham College Senior Members Research Support fund.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Cambridge
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data is included within the manuscript and supplemental table