ABSTRACT
HIV coinfection is associated with more rapid liver fibrosis progression in hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Recently, much work has been done to improve outcomes of liver disease and to identify targets for pharmacological intervention in coinfected patients. In this study, we analyzed clinical data of 1,858 participants from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) to characterize risk factors associated with changes in the APRI and FIB-4 surrogate measurements for advanced fibrosis. We assessed 887 non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNV) in a subset of 661 coinfected participants for genetic associations with changes in liver fibrosis risk. The variants utilized produced amino acid substitutions that either altered an N-linked glycosylation (NxS/T) sequon or mapped to a gene related to glycosylation processes. Seven variants were associated with an increased likelihood of liver fibrosis. The most common variant, ALPK2 rs3809973, was associated with liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfected patients; individuals homozygous for the rare C allele displayed elevated APRI (0.61, 95% CI, 0.334 to 0.875) and FIB-4 (0.74, 95% CI, 0.336 to 1.144) relative to those coinfected women without the variant. Although warranting replication, ALPK2 rs3809973 may show utility to detect individuals at increased risk for liver disease progression.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov) provided grant support to the following co-authors: U01-HL146242 (BEA, JCP); U01-HL146205 (SGK); U01-HL146202 (MHA); U01-HL146245 (ALF); U01-HL146193 (SJG); and U01-HL146204 (KMA).
Clinical Trial
The WIHS is an observational study
Funding Statement
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health grants R01-CA238455 and R01-CA135069
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Informed consent was provided by all participants via protocols approved by institutional review committees or boards (IRB) at each affiliated institution with consent to studies of host genetics was specifically obtained for women who contributed to this study. The IRBs at the Chicago site were Cook County CORE Center IRB, Cook County Health & Hospitals System IRB, Northwestern University IRB, Northwestern Memorial Hospital IRB, Rush University IRB, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes IRB, University of Illinois at Chicago IRB. The IRBs at the Los Angeles/Southern California site were University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center IRB, Western IRB, University of Hawaii/Kapi'olani Health Research Institute IRB, University of Southern California IRB. The IRB at the New York Brooklyn site was SUNY Downstate Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The IRBs at the New York Bronx site were Albert Einstein College of Medicine IRB, Beth Israel IRB, Mt. Sinai Medical Center IRB. The IRBs at the San Francisco Bay Area site were Alameda Health System IRB, Sutter Health IRB, University of California, San Francisco IRB, California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS). The IRBs at the Washington District of Columbia site were Georgetown University Medical Center IRB, Howard University IRB, Inova Health Systems IRB, Montgomery County Health Department IRB, Whitman Walker Clinic IRB.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from https://statepi.jhsph.edu/wihs/wordpress/. Additionally, the accession number for the WIHS in dbGaP genomic data is now provided in the manuscript (phs001503). The WIHS cohort operates under an alternative data sharing plan registered with the National Institutes of Health and access to phenotypic and genomic data can be requested by submitting a Concept Sheet which can be found along with instructions for Concept Sheet submission can be found at https://mwccs.org.